To: homeschool mama
||That looks like a TV/VCR to me, NOT a PC..
Note...you can see the bed, from the hallway, as second picture proves. That the VD's DID NOT know this child was missing...
posted on 06/05/2002 11:51:35 PM PDT
That closet is full of so much crap there's no way a grown man could hide in it. Ridiculous.
"Detailed shot of Bedroom"
How on earth is the prosecution going to make the case that Westerfield was hiding in that closet? He'd have had a better chance of hiding under the rug! And--did anyone see a HAMPER? I ask because of certain arguments that the transcripts "meant" something other than what they said, about where the undies were found. (Transcript: "in the dresser"; Freeper: "must have meant the hamper")
And Fresno, I'd like to thank you for doing the work you do on these threads--despite all the messenger-shooting and general carping. It can't have been easy.
This is a general comment addressed to anyone. After reading through many of these threads, has anyone given thought to the idea that Westerfield's bathroom window screen was bent, as though he used the window for peering. Perhaps he knew which bedroom was Danielle's from looking through the windows from the outside. Also that night, Danielle's blinds were open. May be he saw her, and may be he even lured her out of the house. He could have even been "enchanting" her through the window with funny expressions and promises of candy or something. Any comments?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson