[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Maybe I'm just cynical, but it occurred to me that the prosecution might have suggested she not be so friendly with "Dave" this time--no waves, smiles, etc. Bad for the case, you know. (But she did call him "Dave" a few times in her testimony.)

Yep........they have done their best to make a piece of coal look more like a diamond.

Pssssssst, prosecution.....it didn't work.

The glaring at DW was too deliberate and the look of "what do I do now" when she looked toward the prosecution was not a reassuring sight.

If I were a prosecutor, I think I would have put in for my vacation about the time I figured this case would go to trial.

[demsux]

It will be interesting to see if the prosecution can PROVE that DW entered the VD home. To date, there has been NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE disclosed that he entered the home...if the prosecution had this evidence, I think they would have mentioned it in the opening remarks.

Further, it has been established that the MH was parked one house away from the VD's on a regular basis (DW would move it every now and then so as not to violate the CC&R's of the neighborhood. This FACT apparently really upset Rich Brady as well as the VD's. Why? Because it was an eyesore? Because the neighborhood children played in and around it? Because they did not like DW?

Anyway, until the prosecution puts DW IN THE VD HOME, I think all this whole prosecution is tainted by the lies of the parents.