Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spitball Felon, 13, Avoids 8-Year Jail Sentence
Reuters ^ | 6-7-2002

Posted on 06/07/2002 7:42:32 AM PDT by Cagey

WALNUT CREEK (Reuters) - A 13-year-old California boy who was facing a possible eight years in juvenile prison for a spitball attack on a fellow student was given a much lighter sentence on Thursday -- although he will still log some time behind bars.

Jeffrey Figueroa, who made national headlines after he was convicted of two felonies for injuring a 14-year-old boy with the speedy spitball, was ordered to spend a spend a total of one week in juvenile detention -- logged on weekends -- in a case that his lawyer said showed prosecutors intent on "criminalizing childhood behavior."

"These kids aren't going to get into any trouble. We're going to keep them in the house," Jeffrey's father, Steve Figueroa, told reporters after the hearing, which also saw Jeffrey's 14-year-old brother given a slightly lesser sentence for egging Jeffrey on in the spitball incident.

In addition to their time in juvenile detention, both boys were ordered to attend anger management classes, told to obey a 7 p.m. curfew as part of home probation and instructed to undergo counseling.

They will both also be required to perform up to 150 hours of community service at a local eye bank.

Figueroa admitted that he shot the spitball -- a gum wrapper moistened with saliva -- on the first day of school last September at a middle school in the San Francisco suburb of Walnut Creek, California.

While Figueroa said he was not aiming at anybody in particular, the spitball hit a 14-year-old boy in the right eye, requiring a trip to the hospital and surgery.

Last month Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Araceli Ramirez found Jeffrey guilty of battery causing serious bodily injury and mayhem, both felonies. His brother was found guilty on a lesser charge.

Numerous neighbors testified at Thursday's sentencing hearing, saying the boys frequently ran wild in the neighborhood and at times appeared threatening.

Ramirez, while declining to throw the book at the boys, did have sharp words for both the young men and their parents, saying they had been "in denial" about their sons' behavior.

Figueroa's lawyer, Caren Johnson, criticized Contra Costa County District Attorney Robert Burke as overreacting to the case, saying prosecutors were intent on "criminalizing childhood behavior."

"I've got little boys. They've got swords, they whack each other with swords. What if they whack a neighbor kid with a sword. Is Burke going to charge my little 5-year-old with battery?" she said.

But the principal investigator for the district attorney's office testified that both boys were frequently out of control and needed to be taught a lesson.

"Normal boy activity is responsible and does responsible things," said investigator Mark Ernst.

"Occasionally they may do something that they shouldn't do, but they generally respect authority, respect adult figures and correct their behavior."

Burke, speaking after the sentencing, said he was fairly satisfied with the sentence but that Jeffrey Figueroa's spitball victim was still being treated for damage to his eye.

"I couldn't replace that young man's eye, and that's what we'd all like to have happen. So I guess you never feel like you've done everything you could do," Burke said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: California
KEYWORDS: spitball

1 posted on 06/07/2002 7:42:32 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cagey
I hope they dont plan on going back 40 years to prosecute all boys...my whole freeking grade school will be in prison...
2 posted on 06/07/2002 7:47:18 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Hahahaha. I'm getting rid of all the evidence including rubber bands and paper clips. Man, those flying paper clips could leave a nice welt.
3 posted on 06/07/2002 7:52:30 AM PDT by Cagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Ooops, my husband taught our grandson how to make spitballs and propel them through a straw when he was about 3 years old....
4 posted on 06/07/2002 8:03:39 AM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Too bad the kid wasn't a "special needs" student with a "behavior disability". In that case he could have gotten by with bringing a bomb to school and threatening other students. School officials in that case would be powerless to do anything because of his "handicap".

When I lived in Des Moines, a 6th grader brought 3 actual pipe bombs to school and caused the building to be evacuated while the bomb squad removed the bombs. The school Board spent a week of collective hand wringing debating wheteher they could expell the kid because he had been in a "special needs" program for his behavioral disability.

5 posted on 06/07/2002 8:08:09 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
"These kids aren't going to get into any trouble. We're going to keep them in the house," Jeffrey's father, Steve Figueroa, told reporters after the hearing, which also saw Jeffrey's 14-year-old brother given a slightly lesser sentence for egging Jeffrey on in the spitball incident.

Whaaaaaaat??? A slightly lesser sentence for "egging Jeffrey on"??? Conspiracy to shoot a spitball? Wow. And it's legal to kill babies in this country, but don't even think about shooting a spitball.

Bic pens and plastic straws should be banned!

Someone please tell me...when does the statute of limitations on spitballing run out? I may need to go into hiding for a few years.

Hat-Trick

6 posted on 06/07/2002 8:18:28 AM PDT by Hat-Trick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
I hope they dont plan on going back 40 years to prosecute all boys...

With the recent advances in DNA testing, we're all doomed.

7 posted on 06/07/2002 8:21:36 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Guess Mom was right. It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

(it needed to be said...)

8 posted on 06/07/2002 8:34:17 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
This has gone too far. The PC/Zero Tolerance crowd has got to be stopped. Kids can't be kids, guys can't be guys, gals can't be gals (I know, that isn't PC either - tough). Parents of America, rise up. Take back control of our schools...and return sanity to school administration. And, BTW, tell the ACLU to kiss off

OK - got that out of my system (sorta) - what are we going to do about this idiocy?

9 posted on 06/07/2002 8:36:04 AM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
"Normal boy activity is responsible and does responsible things," said investigator Mark Ernst. "Occasionally they may do something that they shouldn't do, but they generally respect authority, respect adult figures and correct their behavior."

What society is this clown living in?

We expose our kids to MTV and glorify hooldum like behavior on the screen, then this clown comes along and expects kids to be saints? NO WONDER YOUNG BOYS ARE SCREWED UP!!!!

10 posted on 06/07/2002 8:38:25 AM PDT by zarf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
The school Board spent a week of collective hand wringing debating wheteher they could expell the kid because he had been in a "special needs" program for his behavioral disability.

So....did they expel him or not?

11 posted on 06/07/2002 8:49:40 AM PDT by LibertyGirl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Probably he did deserve some punishment, if he aimed it at the kid's face, and if he is a bully as the article suggests. But it seems disproportionate to punish him more severely than professional muggers, thieves, and other urban criminals, who often receive suspended sentences for multiple offenses.
12 posted on 06/07/2002 8:55:14 AM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Agreed. This did not diserve a felony conviction. This boy will never be able to vote, be a lawyer, go shooting, get a variety of professional licenses. That's way too harsh.
13 posted on 06/07/2002 9:00:38 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
It's amazing how the initial information that came out on this case has vanished. Perhaps those of you who think this sentence is too harsh might reconsider if you knew all the details.

Here is what I read about this case on the day it surfaced. These two punks were wearing gang colors and intimidating kids in the hallway who didn't show them the proper amount of "respect." When the victim in this case didn't acknowledge their "song" and that the Lakers, I believe it was, were the best NBA team, this individual deliberately shot the kid in the eye with what is now being called a spitwad. What it was, in fact, was a foil wrapper off a piece of gum, very tightly compacted and intended to do harm.

There was some discussion also that these kids continued to taunt the victim after he was shot and high-fived each other.

Sorry, I have no sympathy for either of them. In fact, I think they got off light, considering they intentionally harmed another person who will now have vision problems for the rest of his life.

14 posted on 06/07/2002 9:08:52 AM PDT by meisterbrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
From the original article:

"The "dart" went through the boy's cornea and ripped the lens of his eye in two, attorney Michael Sterrett said. A time delay caused by infection from the spat paper led to the growth of scar tissue before a replacement lens could be implanted."

I wonder why Reuters neglected to mention the extent of the injuries?

15 posted on 06/07/2002 9:17:34 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Kids can't be kids, guys can't be guys, gals can't be gals

But guys can be gals, and vice versa.

16 posted on 06/07/2002 9:17:41 AM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Don't be surprised when your husband is charged as an accessory to a spitballing. LOL
17 posted on 06/07/2002 9:19:59 AM PDT by caa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hat-Trick
While Figueroa said he was not aiming at anybody in particular, the spitball hit a 14-year-old boy in the right eye, requiring a trip to the hospital and surgery.

Man, that's one HELL of a spitball. The surgery MIGHT explain the prospective 8-year sentence...

18 posted on 06/07/2002 9:20:38 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
OK, just to stir up hate and discontent, look at it from the other perspective. Sure this is nutty, but what if you are the parents of that kid who nearly lost an eye? What if these two boys really are out of control, wild, threatening, dis-respectful etc? We all know that type of kid. We see them in the store screaming at mom because they want a snickers bar and want to smack'em. There is a kid on my sons baseball team EXACTLY like that. Drives everyone crazy AND is dangerous. Swings his stupid baseball bat every where with out looking and his parents are absolutely clueless! "Oh, no, we don't spank little Billy." When I or the other coachs try to correct this kid on anything, he is rude and just blows us off.

Obviously a spit ball foul is not 'go to jail' criminal, but gez, these kids are going to be in prison in 20 years IF all that is said about them is true AND the parents can't get them turned around.

Anyway, food for thought from a father of 5 (who shoots the end of the straw wrappers at this kids in resturants)

19 posted on 06/07/2002 9:21:00 AM PDT by mad puppy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf
This article doesn't mention that the victim's cornea was ripped apart, and that the attack was a deliberate maiming for not showing enough "respect" to a couple of junior gang-bangers.
20 posted on 06/07/2002 9:23:27 AM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
This was an accident, it shouldn't have been a criminal case. Take his parents to civil court and get some money out of them to pay for the medical costs.
21 posted on 06/07/2002 10:08:23 AM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
We no longer live in a day and age of dispicline, but that of litigation.

This should have been something that was taken care of by the principal at school, then later by the firm hand of the parents!

Let's all thank the lawyers.

22 posted on 06/07/2002 1:37:05 PM PDT by spokanite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
Also, I haven't read anything about the kid that was hurt. I wonder what he was doing. Could he have been playing with spitballs too? Was he being held against his will?
23 posted on 06/07/2002 1:47:48 PM PDT by spokanite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spokanite
Also, I haven't read anything about the kid that was hurt. I wonder what he was doing. Could he have been playing with spitballs too? Was he being held against his will?

He was getting his cornea sewn back together.

From Post #14:

Here is what I read about this case on the day it surfaced. These two punks were wearing gang colors and intimidating kids in the hallway who didn't show them the proper amount of "respect." When the victim in this case didn't acknowledge their "song" and that the Lakers, I believe it was, were the best NBA team, this individual deliberately shot the kid in the eye with what is now being called a spitwad. What it was, in fact, was a foil wrapper off a piece of gum, very tightly compacted and intended to do harm.

24 posted on 06/07/2002 1:51:02 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cagey
I know a young boy in our town who was arrested by the FBI for throwing a water balloon. These folks are lunatics.
25 posted on 06/08/2002 8:50:43 AM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodnesswins
Obviously that kid is going to live a life of crime and end up in Graybar Hotel. :)
26 posted on 06/08/2002 8:56:19 AM PDT by DennisR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmo
Here is an article from the hometown newspaper. Many of these facts came out initially but were then "left out" of the mainstream media reporting when they saw the value in attacking the justice system.

'Hall' time for spitball shooters

Judge also admonishes the parents; brothers face three weekends at facility

By Claire Booth

CONTRA COSTA TIMES

MARTINEZ - A judge sentenced 13-year-old Jeffrey Figueroa to a week in Juvenile Hall Thursday for damaging a classmate's eye with a pointed spitball and reprimanded his parents for taking the confidential case to the media.

The Figueroas, along with family and friends who testified about the boys' good character, maintained that the spitball's direct hit was an accident. A child can't just be a child anymore, mother Yvette Figueroa testified.

"This family needs a lot of help," Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Pro Tem Araceli Ramirez said. "Mr. and Mrs. Figueroa, you're in a great deal of denial about your children."

Jeffrey made national headlines last month after his conviction for felony mayhem and battery. He shot a pointed gum wrapper that tore the lens of the 14-year-old victim's eye.

His parents -- worried about the maximum possible sentence of eight years in juvenile prison -- went public.

They did not mention, however, the numerous run-ins Jeffrey and his 14-year-old brother Stephen have otherwise had with police, neighbors and school officials.

Ramirez also convicted Stephen last month of one count of misdemeanor battery, because during the Sept. 5, 2001, incident at Walnut Creek Intermediate School, he went down a line of classmates hitting those who said they didn't like the Oakland Raiders.

School officials said Stephen had been disciplined 49 times and Jeffrey 28 times.

After a daylong hearing that included glowing character testimony, Ramirez decided the boys' sentences will make them wards of the court. "I've never seen a case where there have been this many discipline contacts," she said.

Twenty neighbors were in court, all willing to testify that Jeffrey and Stephen dart into traffic, block vehicles with their bikes and throw things at cars.

Instead, senior district attorney inspector Mark Ernst told the neighbors' stories, including one in which one brother took a water bottle from an elderly woman and dumped the liquid on her.

Jeffrey's attorney, Carin Johnson, argued that he was under strict home supervision by the probation department at the time.

Figueroa friends and family packed the other side of the courtroom. The boys' parents, in the front row, blanched as Ramirez laid into them for presenting their version of events to the press.

"If the intent was to influence my decision ... out of fear or intimidation or public pressure, I need to tell you that has failed miserably."

She said getting "wined and dined" by national news could have no beneficial effect on their sons. "You lost focus of what's really important here."

The sentencing hearing normally would have been confidential as well. But after the Figueroas went on television, the District Attorney's Office asked that it be opened to the public, over defense objections.

The victim's mother talked publicly for the first time Thursday, telling Ramirez that her son has been threatened at school since the publicity started. "I trust that whatever you decide will be the best because nothing will give him back his vision," she said.

Both brothers originally were charged with battery, mayhem and two counts of assault.

Deputy district attorney Jim Picco, who filed the charges, said outside court that he believed the boys committed all the crimes, but that his office never intended to ask for incarceration.

Ramirez, however, ordered Jeffrey to spend six days in Juvenile Hall, to be served on weekends. Stephen, she ruled, will spend five days there, also on weekends. She ordered the brothers to report to Juvenile Hall at 5 p.m. today.

She also ordered both boys to take an anger management course and Yvette and Stephen Figueroa to take a parenting course. The boys also must volunteer at the Lions Blind Center of Diablo Valley.

27 posted on 06/11/2002 6:46:45 PM PDT by meisterbrewer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson