Skip to comments.
SHOCKING Study Reveals: Men and Women are Different
Scientific American ^
| June 2002
| Doreen Kimura
Posted on 06/08/2002 2:08:28 AM PDT by RogerFGay
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
SHOCKING!
1
posted on
06/08/2002 2:08:28 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: RogerFGay
I guess this is why punching the girls at work in the arm and asking them to wrestle doesn't seem to illicit the desired response.
To: RogerFGay
All you have to do is unzip their genes and you'll see that they're different.
3
posted on
06/08/2002 2:51:44 AM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Ken H
LOL! It is that simple for most of us, though now days you never know what is under a dress or jeans!
4
posted on
06/08/2002 3:01:45 AM PDT
by
Jaidyn
To: Ken H
Why the NOW NAGs have been saying all this time equality meant they couldn't be different! What are they gonna say now? No wonder this is a SHOCKING study!!!
To: Texaggie79; Sir Gawain; victoria delsoul
Ping
6
posted on
06/08/2002 4:30:02 AM PDT
by
weikel
To: RogerFGay
How unPC!
Does this mean that political correctness will no longer rule social research?
7
posted on
06/08/2002 4:34:26 AM PDT
by
R. Scott
To: Ken H
LOL
8
posted on
06/08/2002 4:45:53 AM PDT
by
muggs
To: RogerFGay
We know, for instance, from observations of both humans and nonhumans that males are more aggressive than females
It reminds me of the scene from the movie Species. The researcher explained; "We decided to create a female because we believed she would be more docile than a male."
RESPONSE: "Gee doc, you don't get out much do you?"
9
posted on
06/08/2002 5:33:01 AM PDT
by
RogerFGay
To: RogerFGay
We also know that in general males are better at a variety of spatial or navigational tasks.
Take that Roseanne! Real men don't need to stop and ask for directions.
To: RadioAstronomer; PatrickHenry
Elizabeth Hampson of the University of Western Ontario showed that women's performances at certain tasks changed throughout the menstrual cycle as levels of estrogen varied. High levels of the hormone were associated not only with relatively depressed spatial ability but also with enhanced speech and manual skill tasks.All kidding aside, this is an important finding. Females may be compelled biochemically to seek verbal communication with their mates during early to mid-cycle when estrogen levels are highest.
11
posted on
06/08/2002 6:02:06 AM PDT
by
Scully
To: RogerFGay
Viva la difference!
12
posted on
06/08/2002 6:03:17 AM PDT
by
sinclair
To: goldstategop
If it is true that male and female behavioral characteristics are hormonally influenced early in life, it also gets harder for the religious homo-hating crowd to keep claiming that homosexuality is a choice.
13
posted on
06/08/2002 6:04:50 AM PDT
by
jlogajan
To: RogerFGay
I listened to part of a discussion on C-Span lately where the subject was the harm being done to men's sports, particularly the "minor" ones like wrestling, by the Title IX insistence on proportional representation. One of the more interesting things I heard was an audience member (in response to some argument that women and men do not differ) talk about how neuroanatomy has now shown clear difference in male and female brain architecture. He said that it is now known that female brain cells are actually different in size and establish more connections to other brain cells compared to the male (don't know if this is supposed to apply to the whole brain or only some specific parts). He also said that it is now possible on scans to distinguish male and female babies in utero by their brains (as well as by the more traditional marker)!
To: jlogajan
I think the heterophobes will make the argument gayness is hormonally driven and you can't help being the way you are. Hence why gays need special protections and handouts, etc. Its already happening.
To: RogerFGay
It's interesting that the problem solving tasks in the two columns for men show perceptions and skills that are beneficial for building civilization, and those for women show perceptions and skills for using civilization.
To: William Terrell
I'm not surprised. Its women who turn the boys into men. And they make sure male sexual appetites receive a constructive expression. We should really express more gratitude they're around, or we'd be still in loin cloths carrying clubs and dragging wooly mammoth carcasses into the cave. Having the fair sex is the price men pay for civilization.
To: goldstategop
Certainly, men build civilization for women. This the price of a piece of ass.
To: goldstategop
We should really express more gratitude they're around, or we'd be still in loin cloths carrying clubs and dragging wooly mammoth carcasses into the cave. Having the fair sex is the price men pay for civilization.
Humans are incapable of reproducing asexually. If they weren't around, there is no doubt whatsoever that we would not be in loin cloths carrying clubs and dragging wooly mammoth carcasses into the cave. And just as a side point, in their time that was civilization. Why were we wearing loin cloths to begin with?
To: jlogajan
If early influence is important in determining sexual identity, then queers need to recruit younger and younger children.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson