Skip to comments.
Democrats call terror bill 'ruse' to fire civil workers
Washington Times ^
| Dave Boyer
Posted on 06/19/2002 11:07:45 PM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:49 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
Congressional Democrats and their labor allies yesterday threatened to kill a key component of President Bush's homeland security plan — the executive authority to remove civil-service protections from some federal employees.
"I will oppose that vigorously," said Rep. Steny H. Hoyer, Maryland Democrat. "It is simply using Americans' and Congress' justifiable support of ensuring our security as a ruse to do the agenda that I think this administration has, to undermine the rights of workers in the federal government."
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: terrorism; terrorwar; unions
posted on 06/19/2002 11:07:46 PM PDT
To: *TerrOrWar; madfly
No, AlBushGore wouldn't do this :)
If the Democrats don't like this (especially Uncle Teddy) it MUST be good ;-)
posted on 06/19/2002 11:25:47 PM PDT
The permanent-parasite class.
To: kattracks; Howlin
Ha, when the proposal first broke and all the B_ & Moan crowd here was whining about how expansionistic it was and how the world was ending, I speculated that Bush might be actually making a brilliant move to stealthily institute some civil service reforms.
Just like with Social Security reform, given time Bush is revealed to have a pragmatic strategy to ACTUALLY get some conservative reforms through a hostile political Senate and achieve what was thought to be politically impossible. Some conservatives know how to realistically assess their political constraints and find a way to get results, and some just carp at how utopia was not instilled yesterday.
When the final count is tallied in 2009, Bush will be remembered as a groundbreaking advancer of conservatism.
Who ever came up with the idea that government workers should have any kind of job protections? Freakin parasites should try getting real jobs.
posted on 06/20/2002 1:22:12 AM PDT
To: Diddle E. Squat
How very perceptive and correct you are. : - )
posted on 06/20/2002 1:32:29 AM PDT
Who ever came up with the idea that government workers should have any kind of job protections?
After President Garfield got capped by a disgruntled job-seeker, it seemed like a good idea.
There needs to be a balance between not allowing people to get fired to make room for cronies (White House Travel Office), but that allows for swiftly canning those who can't do the job.
posted on 06/20/2002 9:50:42 AM PDT
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson