Do have any specifics to back your claim that DiLorenzo is the Michael Bellisiles of Lincoln studies? DiLorenzo's book is virtually unassailable in its conclusions about Lincoln. Just as a test, could you outline Dilorenzo's view of Lincoln? This is just to see if your even familiar with his work.
posted on 06/21/2002 4:54:41 PM PDT
posted on 06/21/2002 10:05:38 PM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson