Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Hold Judicial Nominations for 406 Days and Counting ^ | 6/21/02 | Christine Hall

Posted on 06/21/2002 3:16:53 AM PDT by kattracks

( - Senate Democrats have held up hearings for the president's 46 judicial nominees for 406 days and counting.

Conservative groups, impatient with what they consider partisan delay and obstruction, staged a rally in front of the U.S. Capitol Thursday demanding that Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) fulfill their constitutional duty by allowing the Senate to vote on the nominations.

Former Attorney General Edwin Meese called the problem a "judicial emergency" and "one of the most important causes facing the nation."

The chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court has even spoken out about the number of appellate court vacancies wreaking havoc with the justice system's ability to process outstanding cases in a timely fashion, Meese noted.

There are now 89 vacancies on federal courts, including 31 on the U.S. Circuit Court.

"Leahy and Daschle continue to use obstructionist tactics against the president's nominees because the nominees believe that judges should interpret the law, not make it," said David Keene, chairman of the American Conservative Union.

But that's "a notion unacceptable to those left-wing organizations and senators who believe judges should usurp the power of the people and their elected representatives by making law themselves," said Keene.

He pointed to the failed nomination of Judge Charles W. Pickering, a Mississippi judge who was supported by the American Bar Association and a broad range of home-state supporters.

Romone Rodriguez of the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce blasted Daschle and Leahy for delaying the nomination of Miguel Estrada, a former prosecutor and attorney who has argued 15 cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. If confirmed, Estrada would be the first Hispanic judge to serve on the Washington, D.C. court of appeals.

"It is entirely appropriate for senators to question Estrada about his legal career," said Rodriguez. "But to defeat his nomination through stealth attacks is fundamentally unfair."

Speaking to reporters on Thursday, Daschle said there is no agreement between the two parties on how and when to proceed with the judicial nominations. "The talks are ongoing, and ... our staffs had a productive discussion ... yesterday afternoon and last night.

"I would hope we could reach an agreement before the end of next week, but we're not there yet," he said.

Just 55 percent of Bush judges have won Senate confirmation, compared to 90 percent of former President Clinton's picks in his first Congress.

In May, Daschle warned that the Senate would not confirm "without question the nominations of people whose views and records put them outside of the mainstream, or those who show hostility to settled law," he said, with reference to the Supreme Court's Roe v. Wade decision on abortion.

He noted that out of 57 Bush nominees considered by the Judiciary Committee, only one - Pickering - was rejected.

During the Clinton administration, when Republicans gained control of the Senate, Democrats similarly accused the other party of partisan delay tactics on Clinton nominees.

"For too long this Congress has been standing still on some of our most pressing national priorities," Clinton said in his 2000 state of the union address. "I ask you to vote up or down on judicial nominations and other important appointees."

At the time, Republicans were incensed by Clinton's habit of making recess appointments for controversial nominees, rather than allowing them to go through the constitutional process of Senate confirmation.

In fact, 17 senators warned Clinton that further surprise recess appointments would result in "holds" placed on his judicial nominees for the rest of 2000.

But John Nowacki of the Free Congress Foundation says there's a big difference between then and now.

"Usually what you get between two administrations is you get hold ups in the last few months of the last year, where there's a presidential election coming up," he said. "In the early part of the Clinton administration, his appointees sailed through pretty easily.

"There has been a real change in the way the Senate deals with judicial nominations," Nowacki said. Now, he said, there's an increase in personal attacks on nominees, such as Pickering.

"The Democratic leadership in the Senate is applying a litmus test checking with liberal special interest groups for approval and putting these nominees through difficult hurdles," added Jim Martin, president of the 60 Plus Association, a senior advocacy group.

"Seniors who live in the communities where these vacancies occur are not being given their rights," he said.
See Earlier Stories:
Thousands Sign Petition Urging Senate Action on Bush's Judicial Nominees (June 14, 2002)

Senate Committee Moves Conservative Bush Nominee (May 23, 2002)

E-mail a news tip to Christine Hall.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections

1 posted on 06/21/2002 3:16:53 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I guess clogging up the Federal Courts and damaging the Judical system is what Jim Jeffords considers "Moderate".
2 posted on 06/21/2002 3:24:35 AM PDT by Falcon4.0
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0
Isn't he a hero? <sarcasm
3 posted on 06/21/2002 4:59:41 AM PDT by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
I liked the Senate better when people went after each other with canes and tried to brain each other. I even think the Japanese parliament with its occasional fistfights, and the Paraguayan parliament which has known to have a debate punctuated by pistol fire preferible to what we now have. Like I said, this is the worst Senate, professionally and patriotically, since Reconstruction.
4 posted on 06/21/2002 7:06:40 AM PDT by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
So, to the liberals, legislation from the bench is proper due to a "living, breathing Constitution". Rolling back these changes, or even opposing them is showing "hostility to settled law".
5 posted on 06/21/2002 8:15:53 AM PDT by Electron Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Falcon4.0; Puppage; gaspar; Electron Wizard
Related Articles:
Judge The Senate Judiciary Committee Not By What It Says, But What It Has Done
Source:; Published: June 06, 2002;
Author: John Nowacki

The Left Keeps Trying -- And Failing -- To Smear Brooks Smith
Source:; Published: May 16, 2002;
Author: John Nowacki

Pickering Battle Places Congress on Verge of 'Institutional Crisis'
Source:; Published: March 07, 2002;
Author: Jeff Johnson

Make them pay for 'Borking': David Limbaugh rebukes spineless Republicans to support Pickering
Source:; Published: March 5, 2002;
Author: David Limbaugh

The GOP's Post-Pickering Strategy
Source: National Review Online; Published: March 1, 2002;
Author: Byron York

Pickering Fight Shows Liberals At Their Worst
Source: Roll; Publblished: February 21, 2002;
Author: Mort Kondracke

Still Pestering Pickering
Source:; Published: February 19, 2002;
Author: John Nowacki

Dismantling Democracy through Judicial Activism
Source:; Published: February 12, 2002;
Author:Tom Jipping

'A Troubling Pattern': Ideology Over Truth In Judicial Confirmations
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: February 10, 2002;
Author: Paul E. Scates

Democrats Blast Bush Judicial Nominee
Source:; Published: February 08, 2002;
Susan Jones

The Next Big Fight: The first major judicial-confirmation battle of the Bush administration.
Source: National Review: Published: Feburary 6, 2002;
Author:Byron York

SYMPOSIUM Q: Should the Senate Take Ideology into Account in Judicial Confirmations
Source: INSIGHT magazine; Published: February 4, 2002;
Ralph G. Neas -- YES: The ideology of nominees for the federal judiciary matters more now than ever
Roger Pilon -- NO: Since judges apply law, not make it, the Senate's concern should be with judicial temperament

What is the Judiciary Committee Trying to Hide?
Source:; Published: January 29, 2002;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Blasting Conservative Judges: Liberals Launch Their Campaign
Source:; Published: January 24 2002;
Matt Pyeatt

Judicial Confirmation Lies, Deception and Cover-up
Source:; Published: December 11, 2001
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Senator Leahy Does Not Meet His Own Standards; Published: December 07, 2001
Author: By John Nowacki

Senator Daschle Must Remove 'Leaky Leahy' From Judiciary Committee
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 4, 2001
Author: Rev. Louis P. Sheldon

A Disgraceful Blocking of Nominees
Source: The Wall Street Journal (ltr to ed) Published December 3, 2001

Mr. Leahy's Fuzzy Math
Source: Washington Times;Published: December 3, 2001

Sen. Patrick Leahy; Our Constitutional Conscience?
Source: Too Good Reports; Published: December 2, 2001
Author: Paul E. Scates

Judicial confirmations called significantly low
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 30, 2001
Author: Audrey Hudson

Patrick Leahy - Words Do Kill
Source:; Published: November 29, 2001
Author: William A. Mayer

Judicial Profiling
Source: The Wall Street Journal; Published: November 27, 2001

Sen. Leahy's judicial hostages
Source: Washington Times; Published: November 21, 2001

Judges Delayed is Justice Denied
Source: ; Published: November 20, 2001;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Partisanship is Prevalent with Leahy's Judicial Confirmations
Source:; Published: November 15, 2001
Author: John Nowacki

Leahy And Daschle Are Coming Face To Face With Their Own Words
Author: John Nowacki

Obedient Democrats
Source:; Published October 26, 2001
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

Why is Daschle Blocking Judges needed to Try Terrorists when we Catch them?
Source: Banner of Liberty; Published:October 26, 2001
Author: Mary Mostert

Pat Leahy's Passive Aggressive Game
Source:; Published: October 25, 2001
Author: John Nowacki

Operation Obstruct Justice
Source: Washington Times; Published: October 25, 2001
Author: T.L.Jipping

Daschle wins struggle over judicial nominations
Source: The Washington Times; Published: Oct 24, 2001
Author: Dave Boyer

Leahy doctrine ensures judicial gridlock
Source: Washington Times; Published October 22, 2001

Senate's judicial powergrab: Tom Jipping tracks Dems' assault on courts
Source:; Published: June 28, 2001
Author: Tom Jipping

Dems Will Shut Down Judicial Confirmations
Source: Commentary from the Free Congress Foundation; Published: June 13, 2001;
Author: Thomas L. Jipping

6 posted on 06/21/2002 8:34:07 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson