Skip to comments.
Supreme Court gives go-ahead for school vouchers!
Associated Press / SFGate
Posted on 06/27/2002 7:32:14 AM PDT by RCW2001
(06-27) 07:30 PDT (AP) -- ^Supreme Court gives go-ahead for school vouchers, lowers wall between church and state=
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Constitution allows public money to underwrite tuition at religious schools as long as parents have a choice among a range of religious and secular schools, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday.
The 5-4 ruling led by the court's conservative majority lowers the figurative wall separating church and state and clears a constitutional cloud from school vouchers, a divisive education idea dear to political conservatives and championed by President Bush.
Opponents call vouchers a fraud meant to siphon tax money from struggling public schools.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: schoolvouchers; scotuslist; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-228 next last
1
posted on
06/27/2002 7:32:14 AM PDT
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
The 5-4 ruling led by the court's conservative majority
2
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:36 AM PDT
by
jern
To: RCW2001
YES!!!!!
3
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:39 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: RCW2001
Good...our conservative majority hung on.
4
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:44 AM PDT
by
mrs9x
To: RCW2001
Taking Back America one step at a time! A real win for our side!
5
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:48 AM PDT
by
PhiKapMom
To: RCW2001
MORE...
The court endorsed a 6-year-old pilot program in inner-city Cleveland that provides parents a tax-supported education stipend. Parents may use the money to opt out of one of the worst-rated public schools in the nation.
The court majority said the program does not put the government in the unconstitutional position of sponsoring religious indoctrination, even though more than 95 percent of the vouchers are used to subsidize Catholic or other religious schooling.
Bush has been a staunch advocate of school vouchers, and emphasized the issue in his campaign for the White House.
Congress last year shelved that effort. But Bush resurrected the idea, proposing in his 2003 budget to give families up to $2,500 per child in tax credits if they choose a private school rather than a failing neighborhood public school.
Following the court's hearing on arguments in February, Education Secretary Rod Paige said he would continue advocating on behalf of both improved public schools and school choice.
Republican lawmakers in Congress agreed with Bush's stance.
In another schools case Thursday, the court approved random drug tests for many public high school students, saying anti-drug concerns outweigh an individual's right to privacy. That vote also was 5-4.
MORE
6
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:48 AM PDT
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
I just heard a death-groan from the NEA.
7
posted on
06/27/2002 7:33:54 AM PDT
by
twntaipan
To: RCW2001
:> Great news and right in time for the Pledge Decison!
To: mrs9x
Huge... the civil rights decision of our generation.
9
posted on
06/27/2002 7:34:46 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: RCW2001
MORE...
Key to the court's reasoning in the voucher case was that children in the Cleveland program have a theoretical choice of attending religious schools, secular private academies, suburban public schools, or charter schools run by parents or others outside the education establishment.
The fact that only a handful of secular schools and no suburban public schools have signed up to accept voucher students is not the fault of the program itself, Ohio authorities say.
The court majority agreed.
"We believe that the program challenged here is a program of true private choice," Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote for himself and Justices Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony M. Kennedy and Clarence Thomas.
10
posted on
06/27/2002 7:34:54 AM PDT
by
RCW2001
To: RCW2001
WOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOO!
To: RCW2001
Wow. That's not a biased report, is it? (/sarcasm)
12
posted on
06/27/2002 7:35:07 AM PDT
by
ladtx
To: RCW2001
WOO HOO!
13
posted on
06/27/2002 7:35:11 AM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: RCW2001
Good decision. If there is a demand for secular private schools, then someone will start them.
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: RCW2001
NEA, eat hot death.
16
posted on
06/27/2002 7:35:28 AM PDT
by
3AngelaD
To: RCW2001
Hooray!
17
posted on
06/27/2002 7:35:43 AM PDT
by
bvw
To: RCW2001
This is GREAT!! We just turned the corner on education, now let's bust into their backfield!
18
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:04 AM PDT
by
hchutch
To: ladtx
It is sick, isn't it. I hate the media.
To: RCW2001
YES!!!!!!!
20
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:28 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: AppyPappy
YES!!!!! Yes is right. Good news warms the heart, and God knows we need some heart warming around here.
Every time state control is taken away or government shrinks, it's like having a big rock removed from our asses. Great news.......most excellent great news.
21
posted on
06/27/2002 7:36:38 AM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: RCW2001
I wonder how much yesterday's ruling on the Pledge affected today's ruling on vouchers....
To: KantianBurke
To: Temple Owl
Ping
24
posted on
06/27/2002 7:37:21 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: RCW2001
Is it still OK for vouchers to be used at private schools if they say the Pledge at those schools?
/sarcasm
To: ShadowAce
Yesterday's decision on the pledge had zero to do with today's decision, which was made weeks ago by the court.
26
posted on
06/27/2002 7:38:08 AM PDT
by
mwl1
To: RCW2001
The Constitution allows public money to underwrite tuition at religious schools as long as parents have a choice among a range of religious and secular schools Obviously.
The 5-4 ruling [by] the Supreme Court proved that 4 votes can be gleaned on the SCotUS for just about anything.
To: RCW2001
The Constitution allows public money to underwrite tuition at religious schools as long as parents have a choice among a range of religious and secular schools Obviously.
The 5-4 ruling [by] the Supreme Court proved that 4 votes can be gleaned on the SCotUS for just about anything.
To: RCW2001
YEAH BABY!!
yes yes yes yes yes!!!!
To: RCW2001
Opponents call vouchers a fraud meant to siphon tax money from struggling public schools. As opposed to the government schools, which are a fraud meant to siphon money from struggling taxpayers.
That said, I've always thought that what the government funds, they will eventually control. As much as I like to see the liberals have a cow, I'm not a voucher supporter for that reason.
To: AAABEST; Dan from Michigan; Poohbah
Well, if you want more rulings like this, we need to get Leahy OUT as Senate Judiciary chair so Bush's nominees can sail through. Here in VA, Warner's safe (although I've not forgiven him for stabbing Ollie North in the back), so I might ship in a small contriubtion where it can knock off a Rat or two.
Any ideas?
31
posted on
06/27/2002 7:41:18 AM PDT
by
hchutch
To: RCW2001
The Constitution allows public money to underwrite tuition at religious schools as long as parents have a choice among a range of religious and secular schools, the Supreme Court ruled Thursday. Good for the Supremes (at least good for 5 of them!). This is the right decision.
To: ladtx
"The 5-4 ruling led by the court's conservative majority lowers the figurative wall separating church and state "
Nice bit of editorializing isn't it? What a bunch of idiots. These people call themselves journalists; what they are in fact is a bunch of inept morons. Products of the socialist public school system (as am I), which is killing this once great nation. Hopefully this decision will go a long way toward saving it.
33
posted on
06/27/2002 7:43:29 AM PDT
by
cmak9
To: RCW2001
Wonderful. And perfect timing, too. With the ACLU, NEA, and GLSEN hell-bent on imposing their government-subsidized, atheistic, amoral, pro-perversion, anti-pledge, anti-education agenda on a captive audience, this decision not only provides an escape but levels the playing field.
To: FairWitness
We MUST keep the US Supreme Court in conservative hands. There is no higher priority for us.
35
posted on
06/27/2002 7:45:26 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: RCW2001
Great News! In a dark world. A little control back form the all encompassing Big Govenrment.
HA! Eat that Union liberal NEA members.
Go study the CBEST so you can pass it on your fourth or fifth attempt!
36
posted on
06/27/2002 7:45:31 AM PDT
by
Kay Soze
To: mwl1
OK--I didn't know when the actual ruling was made. I'm not much on Court procedure.
To: RCW2001
Opponents call vouchers a fraud meant to siphon tax money from struggling public schools. Yep.
38
posted on
06/27/2002 7:46:26 AM PDT
by
A2J
To: Kevin Curry
Where do I get my voucher for my homeschool?
39
posted on
06/27/2002 7:46:36 AM PDT
by
Khepera
To: ladtx
That's not a biased report, is it? (/sarcasm)Good grief! I only read the headline and then started reading comments. Your comment sent me back to finish reading the "article". You are so right - this article could be used as an exhibit for Ann Coulter's book, Slander.
To: twntaipan
I just heard a death-groan from the NEA. To paraphrase Churchill, it's not the beginning of the end for them, but it is the end of the beginning.
The NEA's problem with vouchers is that it loosens their grip on curriculum and political power.
I'd bet that probably 80% of parents one talks to would love to have the option of vouchers, even if they chose not to use them. The option to leave means that the NEA can no longer count on running a closed shop.
Public schools will probably never be perfect, but prior to the rise of the NEA as a Democrat funding group the schools were a lot better than today. Vouchers won't return them to their former glory, but they can't hurt.
41
posted on
06/27/2002 7:47:11 AM PDT
by
r9etb
To: cmak9
a divisive education idea dear to political conservatives and championed by President Bush. I like this phrase better. The media makes me sick. Thank God (heh, heh) for FR.
42
posted on
06/27/2002 7:48:10 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: 3AngelaD
LOL! loved that zinger, and I'm with you! This was a good decision. We needed this after yesterday.
43
posted on
06/27/2002 7:48:16 AM PDT
by
goodieD
To: RCW2001
WASHN: to work. -AP Breaking News (06-27) 07:46 PDT (AP) -- "It's important for the Supreme Court to occasionally send a shot across the bow to state prisons," said Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University. "It does send a message that the Su...
WASHINGTON: supporters noted. -AP Breaking News
(06-27) 07:46 PDT (AP) -- Thursday's ruling continued a trend of the court in recent years to ease the path toward state support of religion. In a case two years ago, the court ruled that providing educational equipment to relig...
To: RCW2001
"the court's conservative majority"
If the issue were abortion, and the court was upholding that right, the spin would not be about the philosophical leanings of the court. No, we would be told: this is the law of the land!!! The court has spoken!!! The Constitution is sacred!!!
To: RCW2001
First the fierce public backlash against the liberal-inspired goof-ball decision against the Pledge of Allegience, and now this victory for parents opposed to subsidizing the secular humanist agenda in the public schools. This is indeed a dark and depressing day for liberals everywhere.
I'm almost tempted to go to DU to peek in on the weeping-and-wailing fest.
To: Lizavetta
As opposed to the government schools, which are a fraud meant to siphon money from struggling taxpayersDamn, that's well said.
47
posted on
06/27/2002 7:50:43 AM PDT
by
katana
To: RCW2001
The court endorsed a 6-year-old pilot program in inner-city Cleveland that provides parents a tax-supported education stipendIn another schools case Thursday, the court approved random drug tests for many public high school students
You win some and you loose some.
To: jern
This is WAY cool! Now, let's see some legislative action!!
49
posted on
06/27/2002 7:51:53 AM PDT
by
Wphile
To: PhiKapMom
And a major win for the inner city minority communities and a big loss for the teacher bolsheviks...
50
posted on
06/27/2002 7:52:05 AM PDT
by
Pharmboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200, 201-228 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson