Skip to comments.
Supreme Court overturns Minnesota restraints on judge candidates
StarTribune.com ^
| Jun 27, 2002
| Associated Press
Posted on 06/27/2002 9:26:34 AM PDT by CFW
Edited on 04/13/2004 3:36:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court today struck down limits on what some judicial candidates may tell voters, a landmark free speech ruling that could heat up court campaigns around the country.
Nearly 40 states elect some judges, and also restrict what they say or do while campaigning to promote an image of fairness and independence for courts.
(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: firstamendment; scotuslist; supremecourt
1
posted on
06/27/2002 9:26:34 AM PDT
by
CFW
To: CFW
To: CFW
This is excellent news and will lead to a real improvement in the ability of the public to learn more about the people who will be interpreting the law.
To: CFW
the rules, while well-intended, impose an unconstitutional gag orderFree speech bump!
4
posted on
06/27/2002 9:40:00 AM PDT
by
Salvation
To: CFW
How this could not be a 9-0 decision is completely beyond my comprehension.
To: *SCOTUS_List
To: CFW
bump
7
posted on
06/27/2002 8:44:17 PM PDT
by
Valin
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson