Posted on 07/01/2002 10:41:40 AM PDT by BOBTHENAILER
I posted this on another thread earlier and it points out in graphic detail, your road thoughts.
Just a little math to ponder: 60' (timber fire break) times 5280' (mile) times 100 miles, divided by 43560 (sq ft in acre) equals 727.27 acres cleared. At close to 500,000 acres burned to the ground, cleared, wasted and wiped out for at least 10-20years, I would call the trade-off quite good. Bear in mind that 100 miles of a sixty foot timber break is only my guess as to what would be sufficient for a safety margin. Even if it's double or triple that, the tradeoff is more than good. Then again, common sense does not exist with Enviro/nazi's!!!
Genesis 1:28 "And God blessed them, and God said to them, 'Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it; and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the air and over every livng thing that moves upon the earth.'"
Our President knows these words, I'm sure ...
Very nice. Most enviros probably haven't got that far in the bible.
ROFL!! ;-)
http://moxnix2.homestead.com/global2.html
GLOBAL GOVERNANCE (Part 4 of 9)By Henry LambTHE ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT (1970s)Not a single vote was cast against the Wilderness Act of 1964 when itfinally reached the Senate. Congress thought it was setting aside ninemillion acres of wilderness so posterity could see a sample of what theirforefathers had to conquer in order to create America. The new law was thecrowning achievement of the Wilderness Society, to which its Director,Howard Zahniser had devoted five years of constant lobbying. Thoughunnoticed at the time, the new law signaled an end to the traditional"conservation" movement and the beginning of a new environmental"preservation" movement. The conservation movement might be characterizedby the idea that private land owners should voluntarily conserve naturalresources; the environmental preservation movement is characterized by thenotion that the government should enforce conservation measures throughextensive regulations. By this distinction, the Wilderness Society broughtthe environmental movement to Congress. Robert Marshall, Benton MacKaye,and Aldo Leopold -- all avowed socialists -- organized the Society in theearly 1930s and proclaimed their socialist ideas loudly. Marshall's 1933book, The People's Forests, says:"Public ownership is the only basis on which we can hope to protect theincalculable values of the forests for wood resources, for soil and waterconservation, and for recreation . . . . Regardless of whether it might bedesirable, it is impossible under our existing form of government toconfiscate the private forests into public ownership. We cannot afford todelay their nationalization until the form of government changes."37This significant event failed to register a blip on the radar screen ofpublic awareness. Instead, public attention focused on the racial strife,the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago, and the Viet Nam War which toreapart the convention, the party, and the nation. The First "Earth Day" in1970, which perhaps coincidentally was celebrated on Lenin's birthday,April 22, was viewed as little more than a festival for flower children.The anti-war fervor, again, brought a quarter-million protesters to theMall, and Watergate brought down the Nixon Presidency. The Clean Water Actof 1972 and the Endangered Species Act of 1973 served as beacons to attractthe energies and idealism of a generation of young people who hadsuccessfully forced the world's most powerful government to abandon a warthey saw to be unjust. The 1970s witnessed an unprecedented explosion inthe number of environmental organizations and in the number of people whojoined and supported these organizations.
By the time he's through, if we can get the senate in Nov., your scorecard may be a lot better than a tie.
Very well said.
I can't even imagine the out cry from the media if Bush would have returned the favor. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks, Bob, I needed that. Remember the Detroit News and WJR, Paul Harvey?
The press crossed the line some time back, but especially in the last few months (the "what did he know" nonsense during wartime). Getting the townspeople outraged enough to storm the local newspaper with tar and feathers may be impossible, but at least we have each other...we band of few. (^:
So did the last one; it's just that HE thought it meant that he got all the Monica's he could stand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.