Posted on 07/03/2002 6:09:49 AM PDT by Linda Liberty
On Sunday, one of the "experts" in the endless parade of experts on cable news stated the obvious: "I am unaware of any special significance of the date Sept. 11." His implication was that there is no reason to anticipate a terror attack on July 4 because bin Laden didn't use date significance as a basis for selecting 9-11. Although he was technically accurate, he was pretty far from correct.
Bin Laden is trying to raise the entire Muslim world to Jihad. Creating the mystique of the Chosen is central to his goal, and symbolism is the greatest weapon in his arsenal (thus far). Consider what he said (twice) in his post-Sept. 11 video: "… after 80 years, the sword has come to America …" He was clearly referring to the resolution passed by the U.S. Congress endorsing the partition of Palestine (creation of a Zionist homeland) on Sept. 11, 1922.
Experts on American news networks continually warn us that al-Qaida may be encoding secret messages to sleeper cells in their videos and communiqués, but bin Laden speaks openly, relying on us not knowing even our own history, let alone Islamic history. Which brings us to July 4. We, in our narcissism, assume that July 4 is all about us. But to Muslims it is a day of ultimate triumph.
On July 4, 1197, Saladin (Salah al-Din) completely annihilated the 20,000-man Crusader army at the battle of the Horns of Hattin, driving the "Christians" from the Holy Land until the 20th century. And we can be sure it is not lost on bin Laden that Saladin won this battle in spite of the fact that the Crusaders carried with them the "True Cross" (the True Cross was a relic designated by Constantine's mother during the initial phase of the paganization of Christianity).
Consequently, July 4 is a very likely candidate for a terrorist strike, albeit only if the Islamists feel they have the means to achieve a final victory over the U.S.
The first question is, do they? Recently, al-Qaida spokesman Abu Ghaith promised to kill 4,000,000 of us, referring to America as "Hubal." Hubal was the last and the largest of the 364 pagan gods in the Kaaba to be toppled by Muhammad (al-ilah, the predecessor to Allah, was left standing). The image of Hubal was so large that Ali (Muhammad's son and the first Imam) had to stand on the Prophet's shoulders to push it over.
The second question is, clearly, is bin Laden ready to stand on the Prophet's shoulders now? That really should be a role of the 12th Imam (Al Mahdi – the long-awaited Muslim chosen one who will convert the whole world by the sword). Maybe bin Laden has been hanging around a guy in really old clothes for a reason: Mullah Omar wears the Cloak of Muhammad (which he stole from a museum in Kandahar). We all know neither clothes nor symbols make the man, but in an eschatologically-based war, image and deeds together can be larger than life. Remember, most of Europe capitulated before Tiger tanks bearing swastikas and the mere idea of blitzkrieg.
It is reported that Bin Laden writes poetry in the style of Saladin. For bin Laden, defeating the Crusader army and knocking over Hubal on July 4 would be the stuff of which epic poems are made.
Mark Robinson is a scientist and author.
Details, details, details... these men are terrorists not mathematicians.
http://www.ummah.org.uk/ildl/index.html
Putting it after midnight puts it on the 12th, which is the point I was making. I needed sneakers' lat/long .. but it seemed clear to me that that particular story was just that ... a story
For instance: George Washington's birthday used to have 2 different designations -- one from the Julian Calendar and one from the Gregorian Calendar. You get my point? Does the July 4th date given for the Battle of the Horns of Hatten actually correspond to our modern calendar, or not? Any professional historians among the Freepers? Buehler? Anyone?
While it is true Christian leaders did in a sense "baptize" pagan holidays--in a missionary effort to help people forget the old ways...the fact of the matter is no one really knows when Jesus was born. I've heard scholars say a good guess is in Autumn, since that's when harvest is gathered -- and the traditional time to collect taxes. Your scholars say its Spring... Scholars have also scoffed at the idea that sheperds would be tending their flocks near Jerusalem in December--unfortunately for the scholars shepherds do actually, even today, tend sheep outside in December! Scholars are simply often wrong. The popular scholarly theory is that Dec. 25 or the solstice was Saturnalia-converted-to-Christmas--but we really do not know when Jesus was born, period.
We also don't know that Dec. 25 was NOT Jesus' birthday--as any honest scholar will reveal.
My guess is: it doesn't matter. Its July 4 to the modern Islamists, irrespective of how the calendars have been changed in the interim.
Incidentally, there have been a number of cases where terrorist bombers have blown themselves up because they got crossed up with daylight savings time and such time changes. I believe two of them shared the Darwin award one year for just such a screw-up. They're not likely to be more mathematically precise regarding historical dates.
Was the New Testament Influenced by Pagan Religions? by Ronald Nash
The other links were a result of some research I had been doing months ago on cults. In no way do I want anyone to think that I am promoting Mormonism. Please accept my apologies for linking you to that site as if it could be considered to be a Christian apologetics resource.
Here is a web site with dates: http://www.terrorism.com/calendar/Calendar.html. It's the one everyone links to.
That site is pretty extensive, including dates which are probably obscure to most people in the US and not connected with the Middle East. For some reason (unless I missed it), July 4 isn't mentioned as the US national holiday, though it is mentioned in connection with some other obscure events. You'd think there'd be terrorist significance in the great satan's birthday.
England (and colonies) adopted the Gregorian calendar in 1752. Mobs rioted all over England demanding their lost week(?) back. I'm not sure whether Americans reacted so strongly.
I could have swore that I typed symbol. Do you consider the date a symbol?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.