Skip to comments.
EXPERT LINKS PORN TO WESTERFIELD'S SON!: (Feldman's Message To "The Damon"; Don't Leave Town!)
KNSD NBC ^
| July 3, 2002
| KNBC
Posted on 07/03/2002 3:36:43 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,201-1,202 next last
To: FresnoDA
You are trouble you know that? LOL Have a happy 4th Fres!
To: John Jamieson
The prosecution made her admit that she was protecting DW..because at first she didn't tell the cops about being drunk, correct?
To: John Jamieson
Agreed JJ...the ole' SD press has been in a major SPIN CONTROL mode since the afternoon recess....hmmm....wonder why they have their garments in such a bunch...and it is only the Defense first full day of questioning....ME THINKS THEY PROTEST TOO MUCH....Been gagged up way too long...forgot how to be objective...(LOL, as if it would matter!!)
To: John Jamieson
Very drunk old balding men go home and sleep it off.
Younger, drug crazed, sexually agressive lesbians have more energy.
To: UCANSEE2
Can you fill me in on the DVD Van? I haven't heard a thing about this. All I have heard was David Westerfield didn't see VanDams vehicle in the drive when he came home.
485
posted on
07/03/2002 8:52:37 PM PDT
by
Spunky
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The prosecution made her admit that she was protecting DW..because at first she didn't tell the cops about being drunk, correct?True kim...but I also recall that ole Denise had a little admission of her own....LOL
Kemal also said that in October 2000 she had sex with Damon, while Brenda had sex with Kemal's husband.
But she admitted that, initially, she did not disclose that fact to police when questioned about Danielle's disappearance.
"Our encounter was nearly three years ago," Kemal said. "I didn't think that had anything to do with it."
To: FresnoDA
Where does it say that the prosecution is supposed to be objective!!!! They're fighting for their jobs.
To: John Jamieson
46.6% Yes 53.3% No AND thats from people that have been subject to the bias of Cout TV"s presentation...imagine that!
To: Spunky
I tried to Google "van Dam Damn van" but got nothing.
To: Krodg
BINGO!
To: RnMomof7
To: Ditter
Doesn't everyone have bleach in their house?OMG, I just checked our grocery/necessity list and my wife has BLEACH on the list...if I don't post something tomorrow, ping me...if I don't answer, get suspicious
492
posted on
07/03/2002 8:55:54 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: FresnoDA
Well I distinctly remember you getting upset when the vd's lied about a few things too...for the same reasons. Fear of getting into trouble over the truth.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I am not mistaken. At 4:47 PM, on Feb. 4/02, someone accessed that website. The image on that website was stored in the Temporary Internet Files folder. Try this for yourself. I'm assuming you're on a PC, and you're running Windows. Click on "My Computer". Double-right-click the C: drive. Double-right- click on the Windows folder. Inside that folder, there a folder called "Temporary Internet Files". Open it.(You may find a heck of a lot of files in there. I cleaned up my drive on Saturday, and already there's a pile of cr*p in there!).
Now, those .jpg's or .gif's that are there are from websites that you have visited. Other things there are probably "cookies". If I was to write out the path for one of those .jpg's, on this computer, it would look like this:
C:\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\dusek.jpg
Somewhere in my travels today, I saw a picture on a website of Dusek. I cannot open that picture, I just know that I had a page open today that had Dusek's picture on it. So what has been testified to, again, is that someone accessed a site that had "content.IE5\g5engxqb\lesbianbordello" in the pathname, and it left a "fingerprint" so to speak on DW's hard drive. And since he wasn't home at the time, the question is who was looking at that site.
To: UCANSEE2
We have the information from police that BRENDA pointed them at DW in a statement she made to police.THAT point is very interesting when considering what LE wanted to search for in DW's home.
Anything unusual in the search warrants for DW's home? All I remember is "binding material", rope, etc. and the "child porn" on any computers.
WHY DID THE WARRANTS INCLUDE CHILD PORN?????
495
posted on
07/03/2002 9:02:28 PM PDT
by
demsux
To: demsux
Check in in the morning so we know YOU are ok...........could be you are married to a maniac:>)
To: FresnoDA
The question of the dayWill Neal take the stand?
To: RnMomof7
LOL...
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
He is on the witness list..my guess is he will..
To: BossLady
I bet a lot of people in the bar were wearing black.... "Anything about that seem unusual to you?"
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480, 481-500, 501-520 ... 1,201-1,202 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
