[John Jamieson]

"Child porn is photographic evidence of criminal abuse that has already occurred. Period."

I think you'd better reread the latest SCOTUS ruling on that subject to understand the current law in this country.

"lowlife poly-amorous dopers who are not a proven danger." Gee, don't you think they ought to be investigated carefully....I mean living in the same house with the dead kid and all?

Do your children live with "consumers of child porn" or "swingers"? Mine never did and I raised 10.

Do you think bisexual swingers as a group, might be into child porn more than the average group? I do.

[Valpal1]

I am perfectly familiar with the SCOTUS ruling and their decision affects only wholey digital creations (morphing of photographs is still illegal) and adults simulating/made up to look like children.

Child porn is still illegal and you don't know what you are talking about. You have no information/evidence that no investigation was done, no one does, because that investigative information is not public, protected under CA privacy laws.

[jacquej]

John Jamieson, you raised ten!!!!!

I bow to you, and praise your hard work. God bless you and your children. I have been blessed with only four, and He reclaimed one early by my timeline, at 21 years, but I do not question His infinite wisdom.

How I wish I had been blessed with a few more of these lovely blooms of our love... How I wish... but am grateful for your blessing, you lucky guy!