Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Battle for the Court Will Be Nasty
City Journal ^ | Summer 2002 | Brian C. Anderson

Posted on 07/09/2002 11:26:27 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 07/09/2002 11:26:27 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: summer; JohnHuang2; Sabertooth; MeeknMing
Ping.
2 posted on 07/09/2002 11:27:14 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *SCOTUS_List
.
3 posted on 07/09/2002 11:35:43 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: ChristAlmighty
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH!
5 posted on 07/09/2002 11:41:34 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
fyi
6 posted on 07/09/2002 11:52:47 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bump - excellent article - one worth bookmarking.

I had not realized the extent to which the Court had gone off the deep end.

7 posted on 07/10/2002 12:20:00 AM PDT by ThePythonicCow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks. That's a keeper.
8 posted on 07/10/2002 12:44:22 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post and the ping, Pokey!

Free the da$$hole 50 and release Bush's judicial appointments NOW, Leahy!:

What the liberals fear is a conservative judicial philosophy called “originalism,” which holds that judges must base their rulings on the Constitution’s text and structure, as the Framers understood it, and they must interpret statutes to mean what they say. Very different from the activist and creative jurisprudence that has prevailed for the last half-century, this approach, which was the Framers’ accepted view of judging, would never have permitted the Court’s expansive policymaking role that produced some of the Left’s most cherished victories. An originalist Court could even overturn some of those victories as unanchored in the Constitution.

Regardless of your view of the specific policies at issue, it is vital to America’s future that Bush win this battle for the courts: the Supreme Court’s politicized role in recent decades is corroding the self-government at the heart of American constitutionalism. In a democracy, voters, not unelected judges, decide the momentous questions. When the Supreme Court forces its policy preferences on the American people without the clear warrant of a constitutional text, as has happened often in the last 50 years, it is acting more as an “anti-democratic Caesar” than as the impartial referee it’s supposed to be, in Justice Scalia’s view. Moreover, by politicizing constitutional law, the Court has weakened the rule of law that is the bedrock of our constitutional form of government. As Justice Thomas notes, if law is just politics, “then there are no courts at all, only legislatures, and no Constitution or law at all, only opinion polls.” Why then would you need unelected judges to perform the same function as an elected congress?


10 posted on 07/10/2002 8:03:40 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Great article.
11 posted on 07/10/2002 8:11:44 AM PDT by white trash redneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Great post!
12 posted on 07/10/2002 8:20:10 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Bump for a terrific article.
13 posted on 07/10/2002 8:56:45 AM PDT by Leto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Great post. A fun scenario is that one ultra lib dies, like Ginsberg, and Bush can't get through a replacement. So the court runs with 8 for a while. Then another dies, and the court runs with 7 for a while. That could be interesting. Of course it could go the other way too. Scary.

This will be Bush's greatest test and possible largest achievement. If he could put a solid pro-constitution majority on the bench there might be some hope of recovering our Republic. If he bows down to the RINOs, Dems and assorted useful idiots and appoints liberals (like his Dad did on occassion) it will be a huge wasted opportunity and perhaps a "final point of no return" for Constitutional rule in the USA. The stakes are high on both sides, so a battle is assured. This is why the Senate is the critical battle this November.
14 posted on 07/10/2002 9:08:11 AM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bump! Thanks for posting a great article.
15 posted on 07/10/2002 9:39:00 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78; BOBTHENAILER
Whew...long article!...I certainly don't agree with every single point the author makes...but overall it's a good piece.

...it is vital to America’s future that Bush win this battle for the courts: the Supreme Court’s politicized role in recent decades is corroding the self-government at the heart of American constitutionalism.

Indeed.

There are few things that are more important for our republic, long-term.

EV

16 posted on 07/10/2002 9:45:03 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Libertarianize the GOP
bttt
18 posted on 07/10/2002 11:09:37 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
BTTT
19 posted on 07/10/2002 12:27:36 PM PDT by TruthNtegrity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TruthNtegrity
bump
20 posted on 07/10/2002 3:13:25 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson