Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Britain Is Now The Crime Capital Of The West
Independent (UK) ^ | 7-14-2002 | Sophie Goodchild

Posted on 07/13/2002 3:57:12 PM PDT by blam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: Mrs. P
"The findings are expected to cause further embarrassment to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair, who has pledged to have street crime under control by September." Mr. Blair should take a closer look at the Swiss and their crime rates. I read somewhere that Hitler, the guy who was nuts enough to invade Russia in the winter, was easily persuaded NOT to invade Switzerland, where every man has a military style weapon when he's enlisted in the national guard (and I think they let him keep it if he wants to when he retires), and every home has a year's supply of food and water. I'll bet no one dares to be so rude as to pick the pocket of a guy carrying a machine gun.

I dont know if he was that easily convinced. I read that he twice gave serious thought to it.

But the Swiss were well prepared. Hitler would have had to have fought the Swiss until the last Swiss citizen died, since no one in Switzerland has any authority to surrender, not the president, not any general. Also, all mountain passes and bridges were to be blown up, and heavily fortified forts were up in the mountains were Hitlers tanks could not go. There was no way Switzerland could be conquered, and it remained an island of freedom during world war 2, and also for the last 500 years.

When people chose to defend themselves, bad guys go elsewhere.

England, and most of europe, was not worth our american boys dying for, as it now appears, since the English gave up most of their individual freedoms voluntarily anyway.

On the other hand, Switzerland, would be a fredomm loving country that we should be proud to help defend.

41 posted on 07/14/2002 8:24:45 AM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I'm sending that article to my Daddy, backhoe. Thanks for the link!

I remembered where I read the bit about Switzerland. It's in an article online here: http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/ayoob70.html

Sorry, I can't figure out how to make this a clickable link :-(

42 posted on 07/14/2002 1:13:51 PM PDT by Mrs. P
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
UK was too peaceful so they imported crime from the 3rd world. The wonders of multi culturalism.
43 posted on 07/14/2002 1:17:17 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. P
Thanks for looking and passing it on... the link I can do:

-http://www.backwoodshome.com/articles2/ayoob70.html--

44 posted on 07/14/2002 1:37:16 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Comment #45 Removed by Moderator

To: Suffolkman
Er...so why did he choose to invade Britain and Russia then, which were both heavily fortified and armed? But he avoided Switzerland, because everyone had a little peashooter rifle? Hmmm...sounds like nonsense to me. Sorry.

Switzerland has a big civil defense program. As I understand it each home has a year's supply of food and water and there is a plan in place to blow bridges and defend the country. Read the highlighted links above, if you don't believe me. The one that discusses HCI gives the facts in more detail.

46 posted on 07/16/2002 3:21:09 AM PDT by Mrs. P
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: blam
This is great to read, especially coming from a UK paper. For yearsI have debated with Europeans who always use a "high crime in the US" augement in thier debates (usually as to why the US needs to stop allowing legal ownership of guns)now I wonder what argument they will use.
49 posted on 07/16/2002 4:05:51 AM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
The UK could always follow our lead and allow people to illegally cross our borders, cloth, feed and give them medical attention at the tax payers expense and do nothing about them breaking the law. Look at crime rates in California and Arizona who have huge numbers of illegals sitting in their prisons (again at the tax payers expense) for crimes commited once crossing the border.
50 posted on 07/16/2002 4:10:15 AM PDT by Brytani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jon Geb
I bet this story wont make it on DemacRATic underground.

Nah, they'll just blame Newt Gingrich and the Bush administration for it...

51 posted on 07/16/2002 4:27:45 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Why don't they grab more guns?

rofl !!

52 posted on 07/16/2002 4:32:14 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacDonald14
The Media Monopoly has already succeeded in Censoring anything written attributing crime to immigrants.

hhmmm....you don't say! ;)

media monopoly? do you mean the world monopoly or britain's media monopoly?

53 posted on 07/16/2002 3:58:41 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
my Sig and a "shall carry" permit help my surrounds a lot
54 posted on 07/17/2002 10:59:01 AM PDT by chemainus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson