Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC News special, "War on Drugs, A War On Ourselves With John Stossel."
email ^ | July 25, 2002 | John Stossel

Posted on 07/25/2002 11:44:55 AM PDT by logician2u

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: Khepera
sounds like your getting shafted. quit the cancer sticks and tell your friend to stop bogarting the weed, IMO!

you'll save money, and at least be getting high...

61 posted on 07/25/2002 1:49:16 PM PDT by Benson_Carter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
2 packs a day! You had better cut back before the lung police raid your house and steal your breath...I used to smoke but I gave it up in favor of the much more attractive habbit of chewing tobbacco. I prefer direct mucous transmission of my nicotine.

BTW..My main page is up...I hope it meets with your approval. Here it is

EBUCK

62 posted on 07/25/2002 2:01:07 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Nice page. I own a website too! Not as nice as yours but it's just for fun.

http://www.bluegrasspro.com
63 posted on 07/25/2002 2:17:48 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Very nice! Did you do all that?

I hate bluegrass BTW!!!

..Just kidding..

EBUCK

64 posted on 07/25/2002 2:21:02 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Yes I did all that. It needs a lot of work. Check out the videos I did back when everything was 56k modems. I hope to make some changes before long. (Video link in left hand menu panel)
65 posted on 07/25/2002 2:23:57 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Needs work? Looks like a hell of a lot of work to me. Do you mind if I save your source for the code?

EBUCK

66 posted on 07/25/2002 3:04:22 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Needs work? Looks like a hell of a lot of work to me.

Came out funny...Tried to say (and failed miserably) Looks like you put a lot of work into it already.

EBUCK

67 posted on 07/25/2002 3:05:37 PM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Read the threads about Inuit huffing gasoline.

I saw a great episode on COPS (or some reality cop show) where they stumble upon a basement full of people huffing toluolene, evidently a strong solvent...

It's dark, it's damp, and there's a half-dozen people looking literally like zombies. Completely unlike any other type of 'stoned' behavior I'd ever seen. They were just staring, at nothing. No conversation, just sittin' there, huffing toluolene. The best part was, they cops clear the room out, with cans and cans of empty toluolene littering the room, and as they're just about to leave the room, a cop notices one last person huddled on the ground in a corner. In the 15-20 minutes it took for them to clear the room, NO ONE had noticed this guy. He was awake, just staring blankly... everyone missed him. He didn't say a word, didn't try and run, nothin'.

I have vowed to stay as far away from toluolene as humanly possible.

68 posted on 07/25/2002 3:20:52 PM PDT by zoyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
Stossel talks to a Bronx priest who argues that life would be better if drugs were legal,

WHich drugs? HEROIN?

Study Reveals Decades of Despair for Heroin Users

Before you know it, life just passed you up," the man said. "You lose everything. You lose your wife, you lose your family, you lose your friends."

"But after seeing you go back and forth to jail over 10, 15, 20 years," he added, "they just give up on you." He was speaking of his personal war with heroin addiction, a demon he had battled for decades. And like the aging addicts described in a study appearing this month in The Archives of General Psychiatry, the man, in late middle-age, was intimately familiar with the addiction's physical and social costs.

The study, begun in the mid-1970's by researchers at the University of California at Los Angeles, followed male heroin addicts admitted to a court-ordered drug treatment program in California in the early 1960's. The men were interviewed in 1974 and 1975 and again in the mid-1980's. The report presented the findings of a 33- year follow-up, carried out in 1996 and 1997. Of the 581 men in the original study, the researchers found, 284 had died, 21.6 percent from drug overdoses or from poisonings by adulterants added to the drug. Another 38.6 percent died from cancer or from heart or liver disease. Three died of AIDS.

Homicides, suicides or accidents killed 55 of them. Yet as disturbing as these numbers were — the death rates were higher, by several orders of magnitude than those for the general population — the struggles of the men who were still living were equally troubling.

For example, of the 242 subjects interviewed in the 33-year follow-up, at the time in their late 40's to mid-60's, 40.5 percent reported using heroin within the last year and 20.7 percent tested positive for the drug in the urinalysis required for the study.

Abuse of other illicit drugs was also frequent (19.4 percent had used cocaine in the last year; 35.5 percent had used marijuana), as was the use of nicotine and alcohol.

"The striking thing for me is that a good proportion of this group continues using," said Dr. Yih-Ing Hser, an adjunct professor at U.C.L.A.'s Neuropsychiatric Institute and the lead author of the study.

"Ordinarily," she said, "you'd think that when people are reaching old age that they cannot continue to do the things they used to, like hustling for drugs. But that didn't happen."

Among the men in the study who still used drugs, health problems, unemployment, criminal involvement, social isolation and broken family relationships were common, as they were for a similar group of addicted men who took part in focus groups organized by the researchers.

"Some men in the study did manage to attain abstinence, and the difference was striking when they came into the interview," said Dr. Christine Grella, also an adjunct professor at the neuropsychiatric institute and an author of the study. ,

"They were well-functioning and they looked good," Dr. Grella said. "Those who continued to use didn't look good, and they had many physical problems that were hard for them."

69 posted on 07/25/2002 3:27:26 PM PDT by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
Stossel takes a first-hand look at alternatives from across the globe - including the "Dutch experiment" which separated "hard" and "soft" drugs 25 years ago, by legalizing the sale of marijuana in licensed "coffee shops". Teen marijuana use did rise after smoking was legalized, but a few years later it dropped, and today fewer Dutch teens use marijuana than American teens.

Crime gangs feed on Dutch coffee shops

ISSUE 1787 Sunday 16 April 2000

Crime gangs feed on Dutch coffee shops By Justin Sparks in Amsterdam

HOLLAND'S tolerance of soft drugs is creating a backlash of widespread illegal sales by criminal gangs who lure children into their net, according to a leaked report.

A Dutch government report, to be published this week, shows that in the past three years the number of illegal outlets for drugs in towns with a population of fewer than 100,000 has risen sharply.

Viktor Holtes, a Dutch justice ministry spokesman, said: "The increase in illegal sales is in part a consequence of the government's attempt to control the drugs scene by shutting down coffee shops."

Coffee shops operate legally in Holland and sell a range of soft drugs including leaf marijuana, cannabis resin and "magic mushrooms" on condition that children under 18 are not admitted and that no hard drugs are offered for sale. The police, however, have found it difficult to monitor their activities.

Mr Holtes said: "Due to the logistical problems of policing coffee shops, they have become part of the drugs problem rather than the solution. That is why in 1995, the government decided to reduce their number and limit the amount of drugs each customer could buy to five grams rather than 30."

While the number of coffee shops has fallen from 1,200 to 840 in the past five years, the illegal drugs trade has expanded, the report discloses. It shows a substantial rise in the use of soft and recreational drugs among secondary school children. Wim Van de Camp of the centre-Right Christian Democrats party said: "The current policy is not working. Coffee shops are not the answer and simply reducing the number of them solves nothing. It would be better to close them all down."

According to Mr de Camp, the Dutch have been misled by politicians into accepting a romanticised view of soft drugs as a harmless pastime. He said: "Holland is the leader for drugs consumption and distribution throughout Europe. Unofficial estimates set the annual value of soft drugs exported from Holland at around 19 billion guilders [£5.5 billion]."

The government's coalition partners, the Liberal Democrats, say that the law plays into the hands of criminal organisations. Mr de Camp said the shops are forced to buy their supplies illegally "which simply strengthens organised drug rings". Britain's Police Foundation report, whose recommendations on changes in the drugs laws were rejected by the government last month , proposed that the possession of cannabis should not be an arrestable offence. The inquiry conceded that the legislation was circumscribed by international convention but that there was scope, as in Holland, for keeping cannabis illegal while creating a regulated market for small-scale supply.

A former drugs welfare worker in Amsterdam said: "We've been implementing a policy of tolerance toward soft drugs for more than 20 years. They still aren't fully legalised and it still needs a lot of work. Any country attempting to adopt the Dutch policy should be wary."

70 posted on 07/25/2002 3:35:09 PM PDT by LadyDoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: William Terrell
So you don't think more people will use them? You think it'll stay steady or go down, in other words?
72 posted on 07/25/2002 3:58:48 PM PDT by ECM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
Hey LadyDoc, I've been wondering this for awhile: how much of your business is medicare or medicaid? How much do you profit from big government socialism? That goes a long way to explain why you're so big on the WoD.
73 posted on 07/25/2002 4:04:49 PM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
It really is irrelevent how much of a 'scourge' drug use is on the individual or society, the fact remains it is immoral to punish people who are not harming others.

Justice comes in discrete units, applying itself to one incident at a time, it cannot be an aggregate function. You cannot justify 'some injustice' in order to create a (largely theoretical) 'larger justice'.

74 posted on 07/25/2002 4:22:56 PM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ECM
I think it will do about the same as in other places it's been tried. Cannabis is the exception. It should be taken of the schedule system completely immediately. It's no more dangerous as hot fudge sundaes and as easy to refuse.

75 posted on 07/25/2002 4:51:51 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: zoyd
All the scaremongers who fret about legal heroin won't admit, of course, that it's the toluene zombies that will try heroin, and who would go back to toluene if heroin were again made illegal. Non-addicts will remain non-addicts.
76 posted on 07/25/2002 4:57:42 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: mindprism.com
Especially when that supposed larger justice has turned out to be a nightmare of individual and systemic police corruption, the largest prison population this side of China, and a huge and growing cost to taxpayers. Qui bono? Not me.
77 posted on 07/25/2002 5:00:55 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc
I had an argument with an ob-gyn doctor shortly after Clinton was elected in 1992.

He was ecstatic about the possibility of socialized medicine.

Since he had retired from the Army, where he treated mostly dependents who had little choice as to where they would go for medical help, he probably viewed a national health-care program as merely an extension of the military system of which he had been a part. If it worked for the Army, it ought to be OK for the civilian population, too.

When I say argument, that's really an overstatement. Here's what transpired in our little conversation, as best as I remember it.

The good doctor, who could hardly contain his glee that Clinton was elected and would soon give the American people the kind of treatment they deserved, made a tactical error in describing the perfect universal health-care system. When I asked how it should be managed, he instantly suggested that "the Dutch model" was what was needed, where everyone gets full coverage for everything from childbirth (his specialty) to Alzheimer's and everything in between . . and they live happily ever after.

To which I reply, "Well, I don't know much about the Dutch health care system. I do know they have legalized certain "soft" drugs in Holland and that seems to be their claim to fame.

"But tell me, Richard, when was the last medical breakthrough, or the last wonder drug to come out of Holland, with its socialized medicine? Or does it rely on those greedy capitalists in the U.S. to keep patients alive?"

To which I got only a blank expresssion in response. Obviously this former Army doctor knew only one side of the medical picture and had not stopped to figure out that there wouldn't be much new in the way of treatment without incentives and the profit motive. Shortages and rationing always result when a commodity is underpriced, as "free" medicine is.

BTW, this was before the Dutch "involuntary release" scandal hit, where patients were sent home to die so others could be admitted to hospital. I almost sent the doctor a clipping on that, but decided not to rub his nose in it.

No, I don't think the Dutch experiment with marijuana is one this country would want to emulate -- any more than their socialist medical system.

78 posted on 07/25/2002 5:15:39 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: eno_
a nightmare of individual and systemic police corruption

It is corrupting nations, governments and economies. THAT is the real problem with the WOD, not the 'police state' or the 'gang shootings' -- it is the melding of worldwide organized crime, governments, and covert powers.

One trillion is laundered 'right out in the open' more or less through our banks. Government is a tick on an elephant when it comes to cracking down on this.

It is entrenched, our economy and Wall Street are now dependent on this illicit money flow.

79 posted on 07/25/2002 5:28:40 PM PDT by mindprism.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: logician2u
I will never support legalizing illegal drugs. The reason why I will never support it is when a country legalizes substance abuse, it is a large message to that nation that it's okay to do drugs. Using hard and soft drugs just to feel good destroys your body and mind. We cannot and must not ever not say that substance abuse is okay.
80 posted on 07/25/2002 11:18:15 PM PDT by 2nd_Amendment_Defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson