Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sobran -- The Hive
Sobran's ^ | June 1999 | Joe Sobran

Posted on 07/28/2002 8:09:00 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican

The Hive

(Reprinted from SOBRAN’S, June 1999, page 3)

Twenty years ago, I was struck by the way various sorts of political “progressives” — Communists, socialists, liberals, “civil libertarians,” “moderates,” “pragmatists” — all spontaneously cooperated with each other. It wasn’t a conspiracy; there was obviously no central direction. But the pattern was too clear to be denied.

The word “left” was a dead metaphor; it said nothing interesting about the people it referred to. So I used the metaphor of an insect hive, which captured the way such people moved in harmony and communicated with each other.

In a beehive, the worker bees have many specialties. The hive is organized around the queen bee, but she doesn’t have to give the workers their instructions. The bee that finds pollen returns to the hive and flies in figure eights; this tells the others the direction and distance of the pollen, and they go get it. And of course the bees need no orders to attack an enemy.

Members of the progressive Hive likewise act on their own instincts and have their own code of communication. They feel free, but they are also predictable. Liberals laugh at conspiracy theories that assume that because there is a pattern there must be some central control; but the fact that there is no central control doesn’t mean that there is no pattern.

My Hive metaphor was enriched by an essay by Igor Shafarevich, “Socialism in Our Past and Future,” in Solzhenitsyn’s collection of dissident writings, From under the Rubble. Shafarevich argues that socialism is not just a modern phenomenon, but a perennial problem of decadent societies. In the name of equality, it tries to destroy the family, private property, and religion — institutions that prevent the state from monopolizing loyalty, wealth, and authority. Since ancient times, socialists (under whatever labels) have favored sexual license — “the community of wives,” “free love,” “sexual freedom,” et cetera. By breaking down bonds of kinship, sexual anarchy reduces the individual to a mere unit of the state.

I saw immediately what Shafarevich meant. His words applied not only to doctrinaire socialists and overt Communists, but to all those liberals whose efforts constantly (though implicitly) tend toward a socialist order. Liberalism, I saw, was the retail version of the society of which Communism was the wholesale version. Liberals don’t speak (or think, as a rule) of outright revolution; they move one step at a time, always edging toward the socialist model of an egalitarian centralized state, always nibbling at the family (in the name of sexual freedom), property rights (in the name of social justice), and religion (in the name of the separation of church and state). Like bees, they swarm against enemies of (or perceived threats to) their Hive. Joe McCarthy, Pope John Paul II, Ronald Reagan, and Kenneth Starr are just a few of the many targets of Hive attacks over the years.

The Hive especially hates anti-Communism and traditional Christianity. Though only a few bees espouse Communism, all of them at least feel some sympathy for it. Like American liberals, Soviet Communism strove to “build a new society” — that is, to destroy all tradition. Liberalism’s ad hoc style is only superficially different from that of Communism. At bottom, it wants the same things, without being fully aware of it.

“Civil rights,” feminism, environmentalism, national health care, gun control, and abortion on demand may not seem intrinsically related, but they all extend the authority and power of the centralized state over private relations. The Hive intuits this with almost infallible accuracy, so the liberal bees support and promote such causes at every turn.

Liberalism, unlike Communism, adopts the pose of pragmatism, scorning “ideology,” so liberal bees consistently pretend that they favor this or that measure for purely practical reasons. But the pattern is clear. What they really favor is a state that is both limitless and godless.

The Hive has had to make concessions to reality. Communism has collapsed; the market has shown that it will assert itself against any attempt to control it from above. But since liberals profess to be nonideological, they have been able to adapt to these facts of life, giving lip service to the free market. Yet they continue to favor more centralized government, more state economic power, higher taxes, and limitations on property rights whenever possible.

By using pragmatic language for its agenda, the Hive misleads the general public about its ultimate goals. It gains power as ordinary people adopt its language without grasping the implications. After all, who could oppose such worthy causes as “civil rights,” “a woman’s right to choose,” “protecting our children,” and “saving the environment”? The news media use the buzzwords of the Hive so habitually that they have become virtual organs of the Hive. The typical bee isn’t a fanatical Marxist-Leninist; it’s Dan Rather or Katie Couric.

I’ll say more about the workings of the Hive in future issues.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; culturalmarxism; hive; liberalism; newleft; progress; progressivism; sobran; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
This is an oldie, but goodie. Besides I wanted to post something and see how it works. This is my first time doing such thing.
1 posted on 07/28/2002 8:09:00 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Twenty years ago, I was struck by the way various sorts of political “progressives” — Communists, socialists, liberals, “civil libertarians,” “moderates,” “pragmatists” — all spontaneously cooperated with each other. It wasn’t a conspiracy; there was obviously no central direction. But the pattern was too clear to be denied.

This is very true. There's no such thing as the left-wing conspiracy. Instead they are united with similiar goals, which is to overthrow America as we know it, and to change our culture permanently. I hate to say but they're on progress right there.

That's because conservatives are always losing ground to the other side. The problem with us is that we think we can help the "misguided" left to change their minds.

They see us as their enemies. It's way past time to see Cultural Marxists as our greatest enemy on our country today.

The Constitution says to protect America from enemies, foreign and domestic.

We must not forget.

2 posted on 07/28/2002 8:17:36 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
The typical bee isn’t a fanatical Marxist-Leninist; it’s Dan Rather or Katie Couric.

What a GREAT ARTICLE! Thanks for posting it.

3 posted on 07/28/2002 8:23:46 PM PDT by jimkress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
What a GREAT ARTICLE! Thanks for posting it.

Not a problem. There are more articles about the hive if you click on the source. I might post some more if there's enough interest on this subject.

I found the Hive very interesting, and so true.

4 posted on 07/28/2002 8:30:05 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
Every time a leftist speaks, we should immediately call that person a "marxist", a "communist", or a "red".

Why not? They are calling us "fascist", "neo-nazis", "far-right wing extremist", and of course, "racists".

It's time to play dirty. It's real late in the game.

5 posted on 07/28/2002 8:46:52 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
great stuff! i have wondered about the leftist mentality
for quite a while, and here it is, a great analogy..
see the whole series of articles here:

Click Here

6 posted on 07/28/2002 9:28:03 PM PDT by wafflehouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wafflehouse
Yeah, there's the whole bunch of articles about the Hive. I'm reading through them. It's a good idea to post them if there's enough interest in this thread.
7 posted on 07/28/2002 9:38:36 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Bump
8 posted on 07/28/2002 9:57:50 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Worthwhile reading bump!
9 posted on 07/29/2002 12:59:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Balata

Thought you might want to take a look at this.

10 posted on 07/29/2002 1:26:07 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
bump
11 posted on 07/29/2002 3:46:56 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
"You will be one with the Borg. You All will be one with the Borg." I had to post it. LOL
12 posted on 07/29/2002 3:56:31 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Springman
"You will be one with the Borg. You All will be one with the Borg." I had to post it. LOL

Haha, that's a good one. That is what the hive is all about, basically. The hive seems unstoppable at this moment.

13 posted on 07/29/2002 8:26:22 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Thanks for the ping, MR. Great article, thanks for posting it.

This is a very interesting analogy. I'm looking forward to reading the links where Sobran develops this analogy.

This if a very appropiate first post for you on FR. Thanks again.

14 posted on 07/29/2002 9:26:02 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Balata
Not a problem at all. It's quite interesting that there is no central figure for the left. It is indeed, a hive.

Anyway, I wanted to learn how to post an article. It's real easy.

15 posted on 07/29/2002 9:31:17 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
I think one of the central issues here is the liberal news media is pushing the left's agenda for them. This makes it difficult for the masses to see it as a message from the liberal left.

On the other hand anything coming from the right is labled right wing agenda by the liberal media and the masses immediately back away from those ideas.

In order to have success from the right, they need to address this problem and come up with a practical solution.

I think having FOX news on the air is a great first step.

16 posted on 07/29/2002 9:47:48 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Balata
I think having FOX news on the air is a great first step.

Don't forget internet sources such as Free Republic. Also other good news is that the ratings for the news programs on the big networks are declining rapidly. There will be a time in the near future that it will be pointless for networks such as CBS to have evening news with Dan Rather. Unless they will be satisifed with much smaller audience.

The only reason that they got away with that act for so long is that there were no other alternatives. Today, it's a whole new world. Heck, I would not be the way that I am if it was not for the internet. Perhaps I would just be more interested in sports.

17 posted on 07/29/2002 9:54:44 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
By saying FOX news is a great first step doesn't lessen the importance of the internet.

FR is a great example of the internets ability to reach people who have minds of their own and can think for themselves. Unfortunately most americans are programed to process the 10 second liberal news media sound bite as reality.

The big three major networks still have a rather large audience, but fortunately it is declining.

18 posted on 07/29/2002 10:07:14 PM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl; tiki; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
Ping
19 posted on 07/29/2002 10:10:38 PM PDT by narses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Shafarevich argues that socialism is not just a modern phenomenon, but a perennial problem of decadent societies. In the name of equality, it tries to destroy the family, private property, and religion — institutions that prevent the state from monopolizing loyalty, wealth, and authority.

A continuing problem. The stupidity of "moderates" and "centrists" who are apathetic about such destructive tendencies in our decadent society is also part of this syndrome.

20 posted on 07/29/2002 10:14:27 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson