Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lasereye
Scientific creationism uses naturalism the Method just as much as evolution does.

Really? Where are the important scientific creationist discoveries?

All I ever notice creationism saying is "You'll never find a fossil in that gap!" Or sometimes, "You'll never understand how that works!"

Many of its predictions are already wrong when uttered, but it just fumes and hisses on. It's heckling science, not doing science.

190 posted on 07/30/2002 7:58:26 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies ]


To: VadeRetro
Really? Where are the important scientific creationist discoveries?

There's various creationist analyses showing how DNA creates insurmountable problems for the evolution model of random mutation, just to name one, not to mention the analysis of the fossil record. They're looking at the same things evolutionists look at claiming to show evidence for evolution, and saying no it doesn't. The new fossil "evidence" for homo sapiens evolution referred to in this article is a case in point.

193 posted on 07/30/2002 8:20:53 PM PDT by lasereye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson