Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study: Marijuana eases traumatic memories
Seattle Times ^ | 08/01/02 | Faye Flam

Posted on 08/02/2002 1:19:14 PM PDT by bat-boy

PHILADELPHIA — Scientists have known for years that the brain makes substances almost identical to the active ingredient in marijuana, but the function of these "cannabinoids" remained mysterious. Researchers now say they help to extinguish traumatic memories.

"In certain situations, being able to forget is very important for emotional survival," said George Kunos, a neurobiologist at the National Institutes of Health.

The research, published today in the journal Nature, is not an endorsement for pot smoking, scientists said. Instead, the findings may help scientists develop new drugs to treat anxiety, post-traumatic-stress disorder and phobias.

"This paper is not saying you should go ahead and smoke marijuana," said Pankaj Sah, a neuroscientist at the Australian National University in Canberra who wrote an accompanying editorial in the journal. "It's saying that it's worth thinking about these specific actions of these compounds."

In the 1980s, scientists were surprised to find the brain has special receptors for the psychoactive elements in cannabis, Kunos said. An Israeli scientist named Rafael Mechoulam then found that the brain made its own versions of these cannabinoids.

To figure out why, authors of this latest study, from the Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry in Munich, Germany, decided to examine mice that had been engineered genetically so that they lacked cannabinoid receptors.

Neuroscientist Beat Lutz said he and his colleagues conditioned the mice to associate a mild shock with the sound of a bell. Normal mice eventually lost the association between the bell and the shock. "They figure out that the tone is not dangerous anymore and say, 'I don't have to freeze,' " Lutz said.

But the mice lacking the cannabinoid system never readjust, always freezing in terror at the sound.

Researchers also found that normal mice produce the natural cannabinoids when they are extinguishing their traumatic association with the bell.

It's not clear whether the cannabinoid system helps the mice to forget the traumatic association of the bell and the shock, or just gives them enough mental flexibility to adjust to a new situation, Lutz said. It's possible that the cannabinoids are important for the ability to relearn and readjust in a number of situations.

Kunos, from the National Institutes of Health, said that the cannabinoids probably play other roles. Using similar methods to Lutz, he found that they help regulate appetite.

Sah, of the Australian National University, said the latest findings may explain why some people with psychiatric problems try to find relief with marijuana. Although experts often have labeled marijuana use as a contributor to these people's mental illness, he suggested that people with certain psychiatric problems perhaps are self-medicating in an attempt to help their brains extinguish some painful or traumatic memory or thought.

Lester Grinspoon, a pro-marijuana psychiatrist at Harvard University and author of the 1971 book "Marijuana Reconsidered," said he would like to see cannabis made into pills that could be prescribed, but said the drug is not patentable and therefore would be unattractive for drug companies to manufacture and market.

Lutz suggested that, instead of supplying extra cannabinoids, a drug might enhance the effects of natural ones.

He also suggested such a drug might need to be taken in conjunction with psychotherapy, during which patients would work on getting rid of fearful associations.

"Just smoking marijuana all day won't help," he said.

Copyright © 2002 The Seattle Times Company


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: Conagher; Wolfie; headsonpikes; WyldKard; WindMinstrel; FreeTally; tacticalogic; Xenalyte; EBUCK; ..
If you don't mind, we're trying to run a society here.

Perhaps you should let society run itself. It's been chuggin' along for thousands of years before you came along.

41 posted on 08/02/2002 6:21:27 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bat-boy
Stupidity and lies reach new high-water marks.

I worked with combat VN-Vets for 20 years who used marijuana heavily and daily for decades, only to come into treatment because by 1989, 1969 was like yesterday.

The brain is designed for endogenous OPIOIDS, not cannabinoids. This is the bald-faced lie part.

Unless pot-freaks are willing to admit their "benign" pot is really the same as heroin after all.
42 posted on 08/02/2002 7:27:38 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
If I'm "your average crack dealer," I don't need to buy licenses, bonds, hire accountants, pay insurance, and taxes.

And you think those who do, are going to put me out of business.

Who needs lessons in logic?
43 posted on 08/02/2002 7:33:16 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
If I'm "your average crack dealer," I don't need to buy licenses, bonds, hire accountants, pay insurance, and taxes.

Yes, you have yet another advantage over more traditional small businesses - you're clientele has no interest in whether or not you are legit, because they know you are running an illegal business from the get-go, that's why they're there AFAICT.

And you think those who do, are going to put me out of business.

Damn right they won't - they're the ones spending money on insurance, salaries, and all that other happy stuff that keep businesses running. Criminals don't have such expenses, that's why no one likes them

Who needs lessons in logic?

I'll bet you will get ticked off if I answer that with : "you?", so how could I resist?

44 posted on 08/02/2002 8:01:33 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Bill & Hillary swore under oath they couldn't remember several hundred times. Would have been worse had he inhaled.
45 posted on 08/02/2002 8:05:29 PM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I don't know how we get pro-illegal-drug crowds here at FR.

Who is the "we" you speak of if not your collectivist fabrication. And you speak of "here at FR" (FreeRepublic), when Jim Robison owns the forum and he is against the WOD. So the valid question is: how are you allowed on this forum? I suspect Jim thought opposition would make for balanced discussion/debate. Anytime you want to partake in an honest debate without using ad hominems, without using rhetoric and without using hyperbole just let the people on the thread know that and I'm sure a good discussion/debate will follow.

46 posted on 08/02/2002 8:13:44 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

I don't know how we get pro-illegal-drug crowds here at FR.

Who is the "we" you speak of if not your collectivist fabrication. And you speak of "here at FR" (FreeRepublic), when Jim Robison owns the forum and he is against the WOD. So the valid question is: how are you allowed on this forum? I suspect Jim thought opposition would make for balanced discussion/debate. Anytime you want to partake in an honest debate without using ad hominems, without using rhetoric and without using hyperbole just let the people on the thread know that and I'm sure a good discussion/debate will follow.

47 posted on 08/02/2002 8:14:33 PM PDT by Zon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
ha. Actually the scientists started a study to see if the wicked weed had medicinal qualities, but halfway through they got the munchies and forgot what the study was about.
48 posted on 08/02/2002 8:17:25 PM PDT by patriot5186
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Conagher
Nice to see that your comments and arguments against drug legalisation smack of 'Just say NO!' Keep up the good work. You're really convincing!
49 posted on 08/02/2002 11:06:25 PM PDT by JediGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JediGirl; Conagher
Nice to see that your comments and arguments against drug legalisation smack of 'Just say NO!' Keep up the good work. You're really convincing!

From the web page, The White House, President George W. Bush:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/firstladies/nr40.html

Now living in retirement with her husband in California, [Nancy Reagan] continues to work on her campaign to teach children to "just say no" to drugs, though her husband and her home remain her first priority. In her book My Turn, published in 1989, she gives her own account of her life in the White House. Through the joys and sorrows of those days, including the assassination attempt on her husband, Nancy Reagan held fast to her belief in love, honesty, and selflessness. "The ideals have endured because they are right and are no less right today than yesterday."

God bless the Reagans, and God bless America.

50 posted on 08/02/2002 11:57:45 PM PDT by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
He also suggested such a drug might need to be taken in conjunction with psychotherapy, during which patients would work on getting rid of fearful associations.

LOL. Wouldn't want folks medicating themselves without the bennifit of the omnipotent STATE would we. No no no. We must assure that drugs are not of the natural variety and certainly not taken in the absense of state liscensed and state funded psychotherapists.

One wonders how those canniboid receptors ever developed in the brain without the help and guidance of the state and her demon-psychologist-minions.

EBUCK

51 posted on 08/05/2002 8:36:44 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The whole situation reminds me of One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest, where drugs are only to be used for control, not therapy.
52 posted on 08/05/2002 8:48:38 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Conagher
If you don't mind, we're trying to run a society here.

Ah yes, another New Dealer in our midst.

53 posted on 08/05/2002 8:52:09 AM PDT by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
Great movie.

And you're right, control is the ultimate motivator.

EBUCK

54 posted on 08/05/2002 9:15:53 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
Remember kids, Just Say No (Except to ritalin - refuse that and we'll put you in a foster home)
55 posted on 08/05/2002 9:24:26 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
(Except to ritalin - refuse that and we'll put you in a foster home)

That's the real ironic part. The weed is so despicable that they won't even consider using it in it's natural state. They are going to spend millions/billions coming up with a synthetic form of the canniboids that will never be as clean or effictive as the original. And of course the research will be funded by the tax-payers and subscriptions will be subsidized by taxpayers. Ringling Bro's here we come.

EBUCK

56 posted on 08/05/2002 9:33:09 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
"Every one of the bastards that are out for legalizing marijuana is Jewish," Nixon told chief of staff H.R. Haldeman on May 26, 1971. "What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob? I suppose it’s because most of them are psychiatrists."
57 posted on 08/05/2002 9:38:17 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dakmar
What the Christ is the matter with the Jews, Bob?

That Nixon: Answering the question while asking it, I see.

As for the WOD: Wouldn't the "proper" conservative response be aimed at getting the federal government out of this business, and letting states decide their own drug policies? I know it's a novel thought to the anti-cannabis crowd, but perhaps it's worth pondering ...

58 posted on 08/05/2002 9:49:11 AM PDT by rond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: rond
Trying to reason with a drug warrior is almost as difficult as trying to reason with a junkie - they are both addicted, one to power and one to drugs.
59 posted on 08/05/2002 9:52:53 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: rond
Wouldn't the "proper" conservative response be aimed at getting the federal government out of this business,

Absolutely!!!! And a lot of them are not opposed to such ideas, well, at least the reasonable ones aren't. The basis of conservatism is , IMO, seperation of powers and a de-centralized gubment along with a heavy reliance on fiscal responsibility. All the things the WOD tramples under cloven hoof.

EBUCK

60 posted on 08/05/2002 9:58:13 AM PDT by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson