Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans can help boot McKinney
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 8.4.02 | Jim Wooten

Posted on 08/04/2002 7:54:17 AM PDT by mhking

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: hellinahandcart
They could also back Majette's GOP challenger as far as I'm concerned, in the general election.

Not a chance. Republicans are in for a shock this fall when they discover their new "friends"are not conservatives and see Israel as a way to take back the House.

Follow the money. Bernard Schwartz, who has lost over $200 million, is kicking in more to the DNC and DNCC than he has since Clinton let him sell missile technology to Communist China. As I mentioned above, Lieberman is making goo-goo eyes and cooing noises toward the Palestinians in order to get the Muslim vote. Bush shows any weakness and the Israel lobby slams him hard...but...quietly...behind the scenes... Democrats are wooing Muslims. Look at Rubin, he is getting millions for doing virtually nothing from a bank holding company which has a Saudi prince as its largest shareholder.

McKinney is meaningless in the scheme of things. If Democrats take back the House it is Charlie Rangel running Ways and Means, John Conyers overseeing Justice and Henry Waxman chairing Burton's committee which will be the problem.

41 posted on 08/04/2002 5:08:59 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
That being said, if the choice is between McKinney & Majette only, for Intelligence Committee reasons, I'd prefer to see Majette win, and for embarrassing the Dems, I'd rather see McKinney.

McKinney isn't on the Intelligence Committee. She's on the International Affairs Committee and Armed Services Committee.

So what you're saying is you want the Nation of Islam, Hamas and Hezbollah--the latter two with ties to Al Qaeda--to have classified information leaked to them?

42 posted on 08/04/2002 5:09:33 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
And if, at some point, the Dems take over the House, McKinney stands to take over some House subcommittees because of her slot on the House Armed Services Committee and House International Affairs Committee. If she stays in Congress long enough, she could become chairman of these committees.

That is one of the scariest sentences I have read in a long time. Come on 4th district pull together and get this idiot out of office.

43 posted on 08/04/2002 5:11:12 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mhking
I guess the House Committee on Un-American Activities went out of business?
McKinney belongs in either a jail cell or a padded room.
Funny how the democrats think James Trafficant is a bigger danger to democracy than this babbling buffoon.
44 posted on 08/04/2002 5:13:47 PM PDT by TheGrimReaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
From what I've heard there aren't enough Jews or Republicans in McKinney's district to make a difference anytime except the primary, not even if every single one of them got to know each other personally, swore eternal loyalty, and walked to the polls en masse holding hands. That district was sculpted just for her.

McKinney. Head. Platter. August. Gotta have it.

45 posted on 08/04/2002 5:15:43 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
It is very frightening. As it is, if the Dems take Congress at some point, McKinney's going to be chairman of some of the subcommittees on both of the committees, working her way up to chairman, if she stays long enough--and could, indeed, end up on the Intelligence Committee if she begs. No one has been able to assure me that she wouldn't leak pertinent information--if she hasn't already--to her friends...and her friends are NOT our friends. Her friends cheered and danced in the streets on 9/11. Her friends donated to her on 9/11. Her friends supply her with the Fruit of Islam as bodyguards. You want them wandering around the halls of Congress, having access to classified information? I don't.
46 posted on 08/04/2002 5:16:16 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
http://www.truthout.org/docs_01/0296.MC.CivRts.Pt2.htm


And so while I look forward to the Democrats becoming the majority party in Congress, certainly in the House, I look forward to becoming then the chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee. And we intend to broaden the definition of human rights to include human rights at home, and this is our opening shot. This is the opening salvo of what America can expect when strong sisters and brothers are able to achieve leadership positions in the United States Congress.


47 posted on 08/04/2002 5:20:08 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
Eewwww! That is a scary thought!
48 posted on 08/04/2002 5:22:20 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TheGrimReaper
McKinney belongs in either a jail cell or a padded room.

McKinney and her out-of-control father both belong in jail. But because Georgia Secretay of State Cathy Cox is a Democrat, rather than investigate and substantiate the election fraud charges against both the McKinney's, she looked the other way - eliciting a "we won't do anything illegal any more, not that we did in the first place" apology from the pair.

49 posted on 08/04/2002 5:24:56 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
So what you're saying is you want the Nation of Islam, Hamas and Hezbollah--the latter two with ties to Al Qaeda--to have classified information leaked to them?

So sorry I got the committee wrong, but I believe if you'll re-read my post, that is the exact OPPOSITE of what I said.

50 posted on 08/04/2002 5:29:33 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
That being said, if the choice is between McKinney & Majette only, for Intelligence Committee reasons, I'd prefer to see Majette win, and for embarrassing the Dems, I'd rather see McKinney.

You did seem to equivocate. But McKinney can still do plenty of damage on the Armed Services committee as well as the International Affairs committee.

And I'd rather see a freshman Dem from that district, rather than someone who's working her way up the seniority/pork ladder.

51 posted on 08/04/2002 5:43:26 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So; Catspaw
That is one of the scariest sentences I have read in a long time. Come on 4th district pull together and get this idiot out of office.

Actually, if reelected Cynthia is expected to be the ranking member of the Human Rights Subcomittee of the Foreign Relations Committee, chair in a Dem house. She has publicly stated that it's her intention to use that position to turn the human rights abuse focus to America. Not someone you want with seniority. Believe it or not she also sits on the Armed services committee.

Cynthia's words, from catspaw's link

And so while I look forward to the Democrats becoming the majority party in Congress, certainly in the House, I look forward to becoming then the chairwoman of the Human Rights Subcommittee of the House International Relations Committee.

And we intend to broaden the definition of human rights to include human rights at home, and this is our opening shot.

This is the opening salvo of what America can expect when strong sisters and brothers are able to achieve leadership positions in the United States Congress.

52 posted on 08/04/2002 5:46:27 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
52, meant to ping you too.
53 posted on 08/04/2002 5:47:44 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dighton
The Jews are always to blame, dude. Lazar Kaganovich, diamonds, Palm Beach, Trotsky, chapped lips, the heartbreak of psoraisis, ring around the collar. ;-)

Yup, they're here, they're there, they're everywhere.

The solution, like larry says, seniority for people like Cynthia. Secure districts is what got Charlie Rangel, John Conyers and others (both parties) where they are. It's lied's job to help Cynthia work her way up the ladder.

54 posted on 08/04/2002 5:52:13 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied

Look at Rubin, he is getting millions for doing virtually nothing from a bank holding company which has a Saudi prince as its largest shareholder.

Oh, my, LarryLied/Voegelin...your heroine, Cynthia McKinney, fawned all over Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, apologizing for Rudy Guiliani's rudeness, promoting her Muslim causes, asking for the $10 mil and you don't even blink.

Letter to His Royal Highness Prince Alwaleed bin Talal

 

October 12, 2001

October 12, 2001

His Royal Highness Prince Alwaleed bin Talal
Embassy of Saudi Arabia
601 New Hampshire Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20037

Dear Prince Alwaleed bin Talal:

I would like to take just a moment to thank you for your recent demonstration of empathy with those suffering from the devastating and heinous September 11 attacks on the United States Pentagon and the World Trade Center. I would especially like to thank you for your most generous offer of $10 million to assist those Americans in need as a result of those attacks.

I was disappointed that Mayor Giuliani chose to decline your generous offer and instead criticize you for your observations of events in the Middle East. Whether he agreed with you or not I think he should have recognized your right to speak and make observations about a part of the world which you know so well.

I think Mayor Giuliani would do well to listen to the words of one of our greatest Americans, former Senator Robert Kennedy. In 1968 he said that America "is a great nation and a strong people. Any who seek to comfort rather than to speak plainly, reassure rather than instruct, promise satisfaction rather than reveal frustration--they deny that greatness and drain that strength. For today as it was in the beginning, it is the truth that makes us free." I believe Senator Robert Kennedy's remarks remain as inspirational and true today as when he first spoke them over 30 years ago.

Let me say that there are a growing number of people in the United States who recognize, like you, that U.S. policy in the Middle East needs serious examination. Indeed, on the same day that you made your remarks about US policy in the Middle East, the Chairman of the House International Relations Committee, The Honorable Henry Hyde, spoke on National Public Radio and said, "There's no question in my mind that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is the most important issue in dispute, and has generated a lot of the animosity towards us because of our unwavering support for Israel, which will remain in place."

At the same time, CNN played an interview with former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski who stated that America must "deal with some of the issues that animate the hostility" against us, like "the treatment of the population of Iraq" and that "the Israelis are stronger, so they're naturally inflicting much more casualties than the Palestinians on the Israelis and that produces frustration and rage."

Your Royal Highness, many of us here in the United States have long been concerned about reports by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch that reveal a pattern of excessive, and often indiscriminate, use of lethal force by Israeli security forces in situations where Palestinian demonstrators were unarmed and posed no threat of death or serious injury to the security forces or to others.

Israeli peace organizations like B'Tselem accuse the Israeli Defense Forces of violating the most fundamental rules of international law in committing atrocities against Palestinians. The Israeli Gush Shalom boldly states that "Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip is the root cause of the violence and hatred. As long as the occupation continues, bloodshed will continue and increase."

Indeed, Your Royal Highness, all people of good conscience understand that this kind of mistreatment breeds a hotbed of anger and despair that destabilizes peace in the Middle East and elsewhere. Until we confront the realities of events in the Middle East our nation and the nations of the Middle East will be at risk.

Your Royal Highness, there are many people in America who desperately need your generosity. People who have been locked out, marginalized from America's mainstream. All of those people are poor and too many of them are people of color. A black baby boy born in Harlem today has less chance of reaching age 65 than a baby born in Bangladesh.

Your Royal Highness, the state of black America is not good. It is painfully visible in Washington D.C., where, just a few hundred yards from the White House, one can find black man after black man huddled in bus shelters, doorways, over subway ventilation shafts, sleeping on the street, thrown away like trash. Ironically, many of them are Vietnam veterans who, having served this nation with distinction in Vietnam, now find themselves without adequate care and accommodation. Unfortunately, this same scene is repeated in each and every one of our major cities here in the United States.

I am ashamed to say that my home city of Atlanta is no exception. Just last night my son was out with members of Atlanta's Muslim community who, for years, have been feeding Atlanta's homeless. Sadly, no one in mainstream Atlanta knows about the tireless and generous work of the local Muslim community. But the poor know, and I guess at one level that's all that matters. But on a broader view mainstream America should know.

The Justice Department admits that blacks are more likely than whites to be pulled over by police, imprisoned, and put to death. And, though blacks and whites have about the same rate of drug use, blacks are more likely to be arrested than whites and are more likely to receive longer prison sentences than whites. Incredibly, 80% of people in prison in the United States are people of color. Twenty-six black men were executed last year, some probably innocent; America began 2001 by executing a retarded black woman.

Government studies on health disparities confirm that blacks are less likely to receive surgery, transplants, and prescription drugs than whites. Physicians are less likely to prescribe appropriate treatment for blacks than for whites and black scientists, physicians, and institutions are shut out of the funding stream to prevent all this. I serve in Congress where the Black Caucus is shrinking. Yet, sections of the Voting Rights Act will soon expire, and quite frankly, after crippling Court decisions, there is not much left of affirmative action to mend.

In the FBI's own words, its counterintelligence program (COINTELPRO) had as a goal, "to expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize" the activities of black organizations and to prevent black "leaders from gaining respectability." And instead of real leaders, COINTELPRO offers us hand-picked "court priests" who are more loyal to the plan than to the people. Court priests who preach peace, peace when there is no peace.

As you can see, the statistics are very grim for Black America. Although your offer was not accepted by Mayor Giuliani, I would like to ask you to consider assisting Americans who are in dire need right now. I believe we can guide your generosity to help improve the state of Black America and build better lives.

My office can provide you with a list of charities who labor under the most difficult circumstances to try and improve the lives of the people they serve. I hope you will consider reaching out to our charities and to our people who are in need.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions you may have.

Sincerely,

 

  Cynthia McKinney

Member of Congress

###

 

Cynthia McKinney: Today's Hanoi Jane

By Debbie Schlussel
debbie@politicalusa.com

10/22/2001

 
Get Updates

During World War II, we had Tokyo Rose sending demoralizing messages to our troops. During Vietnam, we had Hanoi Jane Fonda sending her treasonous messages to our boys in Southeast Asia, while aiming the Communists' cannons at them.

And in this War Against Terrorism, we have Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney, D-Ga., – Jihad Cindy – to demoralize us and give aid and comfort to the enemy.

McKinney has a strong record of hating America. During the recent U.N. World Conference Against Racism, she attacked the U.S. with the rest of the Arab world (now our "moderate" partners in the "Coalition Against Terrorism") and Third World republics in her push for slavery reparations, saying the White House is "just full of latent racists."

But her latest set of actions are the most outrageous.

Take McKinney's pandering letter to Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, in which she apologized for the valorous actions of New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani. Talal, nephew of Saudi King Fahd, recently visited New York to see the World Trade Center remains and gave Giuliani a $10 million check for relief efforts. Then, the prince released a statement full of moral equivocations, rationalizing the murder of 6,000 innocent Americans and blaming U.S. foreign policy, "suggesting" it be changed.

It's hard to ignore a $10 million dollar suggestion, no matter how ridiculous and immoral.

But not for the valiant Giuliani. In the highest act of moral and civic courage, he promptly returned the check with a statement: "There is no moral equivalent for this attack. The people who did it lost any right to ask for justification when they slaughtered 5,000, 6,000 innocent people ... Not only are those statements wrong, they're part of the problem." Giuliani is an American hero.

Back to the American villainess. Last Friday, McKinney, in a ludicrous letter, apologized to the prince for Giuliani's actions, accusing Giuliani of denying the prince's "right to speak and make observations about a part of the world you know so well."

Huh?

Nobody denied the prince's speech rights – which nobody in his country, Saudi Arabia, has, by the way. He made his statement without being tortured to death, a la Middle-Eastern civil liberties.

But McKinney is right about one thing: The prince and his family know that part of the world well – which is why, according to New York Times and Wall Street Journal reports, there is significant evidence that the Saudi government had their hands in the attacks and that they tacitly continue to support Osama bin Laden through his family, which lives comfortably in Saudi Arabia and hasn't cut their brother off.

McKinney's letter was so disgusting, even her Georgia Democratic colleague, Senator Zell Miller called it "disgraceful" and denounces her on his website. Not only did McKinney agree with the prince's "remarks," but in her own shameful moral equivocation, she attacked America because, "Your Royal Highness, the state of Black America is not good." McKinney wrote, "There are many people in America who desperately need your generosity," making the false assertion that a black baby born in Harlem has a worse life expectancy than one born in Bangladesh.

No, Cindy, America does not need Saudi "generosity." The Saudis need ours – like the generosity we gave in the Gulf War, saving the prince's shaky monarchy from being exiled to a Swiss chalet, while his country became a province of Iraq. And look what we've gotten in return – a royal slap in the face, aided by Jihad Cindy. I guess McKinney forgot the life expectancy of blacks in the Muslim Arab world, including Saudi-aided Sudan, where two million black Christians were savagely murdered and where millions more are enslaved, tortured, maimed and raped.

McKinney's new buddy, Prince Alwaleed, is the sixth richest man in the world, according to Forbes. Giuliani showed him that even the wealthiest of scoundrels cannot buy respectability with their blood money. Unless they're buying Congresswoman McKinney.

And her price is very cheap, apparently. She was the headliner at the Oct. 7 fundraising dinner for the Council on American Islamic Relations, a Muslim terrorist front group that has been hanging out with President Bush a lot lately.

In exchange for her revered status with this and other radical Islamic pro-terrorist groups, McKinney has attempted to stop congressional investigations into them and the WTC attacks.

At an Oct. 3 House Committee on International Relations Hearing on al-Qaida and the Global Reach of Terrorism, McKinney had a temper tantrum when Oliver "Buck" Revell testified. Revell, associate director of the FBI in charge of Investigative and Counter-Intelligence Operations from 1985-1991, attempted to show segments of the 1995 documentary, "Jihad in America."

McKinney wanted to censor it, so that Americans watching on C-SPAN would not see evidence of the extensive Muslim terrorist network in America documented in the film, including that of Islamic Jihad front-man and University of South Florida Professor, Dr. Sami Al-Arian. No complaints from her about denying Revell's right to speak.

We're in the middle of war. But atop her tax-funded website, alongside a photo of her in leopard-print accents, are "news briefs," including "COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story," an attack on the U.S., which she and the Black Caucus presented to the U.N. World Conference Against Racism. Hello! – COINTELPRO took place under Nixon, three decades ago. And the victims cited in this 78-page diatribe by America-hating leftists Noam Chomsky and Howard Zinn are guys like Dhoruba Bin Wahad aka Richard Moore, a Black Panther who machine-gunned police officers, and convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal.

Echoing her friend, Nation of Islam Minister Louis Farrakhan, whom she's refused to denounce, McKinney's website demands evidence against Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.

During wars in lands far away, Tokyo Rose and Hanoi Jane were bad enough. But now the war is on our homefront. And so is Jihad Cindy.

Debbie Schlussel is a political commentator and attorney. She is a frequent guest on ABC's "Politically Incorrect with Bill Maher" and Fox News Channel. Join her fan club or discussion group.

  


55 posted on 08/04/2002 5:53:58 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw; SJackson
You did seem to equivocate.

I think you saw what you wanted to see.

But for the comprehension impaired, I'll try again.

I would rather see a Republican win.

If that is impossible, then for national security reasons, I'd rather Majette win.

But the idea of McKinney winning and being a continuing embarrassment to the Democrats also has its appeal.

Make sense yet?

56 posted on 08/04/2002 5:54:10 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
D@mn! She has got to go along with her Strong brothas and sistas! I might move up there for a week just to register and vote against her!

She is a scary girl, because she is an idiot.

57 posted on 08/04/2002 5:55:13 PM PDT by SeeRushToldU_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Given her record, she'll want to open investigations on Mumia, H. Rap Brown (or whatever is name is now), Leonard Pellitier and who knows who else--oh, the poor picked on Muslims (with CAIR & AMC whispering in her ear).
58 posted on 08/04/2002 5:59:03 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
So you want both to win, for different reasons.

Makes sense to me.

59 posted on 08/04/2002 6:00:37 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
bump
60 posted on 08/05/2002 9:48:33 AM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson