Skip to comments.
Non-union construction workers used to cut costs on new Teamsters building
Aug. 9, 2002
| L.M. SIXEL
Posted on 08/09/2002 9:33:14 PM PDT by lewislynn
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
08/09/2002 9:33:14 PM PDT
by
lewislynn
To: *Union Bosses
.
To: lewislynn
HAHAHAHA... hypocrites...
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: lewislynn
To: lewislynn
It makes one want to break into an old favorite from Al Gore's earliest childhood:
"Look for the union label..."
To: lewislynn
I remember a few years ago when the office secretaries for some Union Goonery had to go to court to force the union to allow them to organize. I never did hear how it came out.
7
posted on
08/09/2002 9:45:10 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: Shovelhead
"Look for the union label..."
Hopefully that's a bootprint on the guys ass!
8
posted on
08/09/2002 9:48:32 PM PDT
by
dalereed
To: lewislynn
Ya know, it's funny - the Teamsters were the only union I ever liked being in... ;0)
They never bothered me, didn't try to indoctrinate me and my kids (unlike the SEIU did when I was in that - the whole 'Wobblies'-themed family picnic was the final straw...
To: lewislynn
Hawaii is steadily becoming a third world state thanks to the unions.
They still beat and attempt to kill scabs.
"Privatization" is worse than "nigger"...
10
posted on
08/09/2002 10:07:23 PM PDT
by
Vidalia
To: Texas_Jarhead
Yeah!!hypocrits!!
11
posted on
08/09/2002 10:21:05 PM PDT
by
timestax
To: lewislynn
http://www.paleadership.org/news/aflcio.html
From the American Spectator -- 3/14/01
www.spectator.org
America's Sweatshop -- AFL-CIO says 'do as I say, not as I do'
The AFL-CIO headquarters in Washington, D.C. has been undergoing extensive
interior and exterior refurbishment over the past 18 months. And given that
it is the AFL-CIO building, you'd assume the big laborites used all-union
help.
But apparently the AFL-CIO wasn't looking for the union label as diligently
as it expects other contractors to look. On several occasions, the union has
hired non-union electrical and construction help. "Only if they couldn't
find a local union shop to do it," says an in-house source. "But it did save
us some money." If anyone knows about the high cost of union help, it's the
AFL-CIO.
12
posted on
08/09/2002 10:28:58 PM PDT
by
grundle
To: lewislynn
"But it has become a sour moment for other labor leaders because the Teamsters didn't use union construction workers. They were told by the Teamsters that union contractors cost too much."A case of do as I say not as I do if there ever was one. Unions screw everyone in the long run.
To: Texas_Jarhead
"HAHAHAHA... hypocrites..."
Now why did they hand us this little piece of ammo...everytime they make trouble cause non union was hired, this article can be sited. Morons. I don't mind non-union. But too many are illegal aliens replacing American workers and thats just plain wrong.
14
posted on
08/09/2002 11:48:49 PM PDT
by
brat
To: lewislynn
***They were told by the Teamsters that union contractors cost too much. ***
Bump!
To: lewislynn
Ooh! This is just delicious! Bump!
To: lewislynn
<> "I just can't believe the cost issue outweighed the right thing to do."
Welcome to the real world, sporty. Union BS drives costs up outrageously. A non-union restaurant equipment maker I dealt with once had orders for a large job in NYC and were required by their contract to use union made stainless steel components instead of producing them in their own shop. The problem was solved by buying decals from one of the officials of the union. $1,400.00 for decals instead of losing a little over $100,000.00 in profit doing their own fabrication was a no-brainer.
Unions cut their own throats with their corrupt practices.
17
posted on
08/10/2002 5:26:32 AM PDT
by
Twodees
To: Shovelhead
LOL!!
18
posted on
08/10/2002 5:34:35 AM PDT
by
nygoose
To: theDentist
What goes around,come around. The only problem is living long enough to see it sometimes.
19
posted on
08/10/2002 5:39:13 AM PDT
by
gunnedah
To: lewislynn
FUUUUUUUUUUUNNY!
20
posted on
08/10/2002 6:22:58 AM PDT
by
Illbay
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson