Skip to comments.
Iraq orders Baghdadis to stay put
UPI
| 8/15/02
Posted on 08/15/2002 12:40:41 PM PDT by kattracks
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Aug 15, 2002 (United Press International via COMTEX) -- Iraqi authorities have ordered Baghdad residents to stay put and warned that their money and property will be confiscated if they leave the city without permission, according to a well-informed source. The measures were taken, the source said, to prevent people fleeing in anticipation of a U.S. military strike. Copyright 2002 by United Press International.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barbequingsaddam; iraq; iraqihumanshields; jihadisreallycrap; saddam; saddamistoast; youstayanddie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-157 next last
But I thought the Iraqis were all ready to "fight to the death".
1
posted on
08/15/2002 12:40:41 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I am fortunate that I was born in the United States and not in Iraq.
To: kattracks
No, they just need plenty of human shields.
To: SamAdams76
To: kattracks
In 1941, Stalin simply ordered anyone trying to leave Moscow to be shot. I'm sure Saddam will get around to that shortly.
5
posted on
08/15/2002 12:43:57 PM PDT
by
Argus
To: kattracks
Most Iraqis want Saddam dead.......Just can't overcome his rule without outside help.....
Saddam needs his "subjects" as human shields to place his troops amoungst.....
NeverGore
6
posted on
08/15/2002 12:44:36 PM PDT
by
nevergore
To: kattracks
Guess Saddam needs some dead non-combatants for CNN.
7
posted on
08/15/2002 12:45:29 PM PDT
by
Spruce
To: HELLRAISER II
Exactly...And it must be disconcerting to realize that you are the only thing standing between the bomb, and the target...
8
posted on
08/15/2002 12:47:23 PM PDT
by
Iscool
To: kattracks
Talk about a death sentence. Jeez.
What a horrible, sinister coward he is....
So be it. If Baghdad gets nuked by the Israelis, I guess it's no different than the set of conditions Harry Truman had to face; given the choice of lots of Japanese innocents dying versus the American carnage that would have taken place by invading the Japanese mainland.
9
posted on
08/15/2002 12:48:28 PM PDT
by
Victor
To: kattracks
Iraqi authorities have ordered Baghdad residents to stay put I have this mental image of Niedermeyer in the middle of the riot at the end of Animal House yelling "ALL IS WELL".
10
posted on
08/15/2002 12:48:49 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: kattracks
Iraq orders Baghdadis to stay put Not to be confused with Big Daddys or Sugar Daddys
11
posted on
08/15/2002 12:49:50 PM PDT
by
SGCOS
To: kattracks
Oh well.... the safety and well-being of the enemy is not our concern. If Saddam wants a "human shield" he should use somebody we give a damn about. They may as well leave anyway and save their lives if they can, I don't think their property in Baghdad is going to be of much value anyway once we start bombing all those military assets that Saddam has planted throughout their neighborhoods.
12
posted on
08/15/2002 12:50:18 PM PDT
by
Kenton
To: kattracks
Yuday (one morning at sunrise): Hey, Dad, you'd better come see this...
Saddam: Holy crap!! Where did all the people go??!! Quick, have my Security Service and Republican Guards begin confiscating their money and property!!!
Yuday: I can't, they left.
Saddam: Where are they??!!
Yuday: I'm guessing they're all sucking down some of those evil dog, American MREs right about now, just outside the city.
Saddam: Yuday, have my driver bring the Mercedes up. We need to leave...NOW!!!
Yuday: Uhhmm....Dad, about the Mercedes....I was out partying last night, and, uhmm...well, you know...
13
posted on
08/15/2002 12:50:47 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
To: Iscool
To say the least, Saddam is an evil man period. He is a danger to World peace & to his own people, let us hope that they are smart enough to pop a few caps in his @ss before the bombs start dropping & hundreds of thousands of innocents start dying.
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: Argus
Saddam is a great admirer of Stalin.
To: aristeides
"....Saddam is a great admirer of Stalin...."
I think he even resembles ol' Joe a little.
17
posted on
08/15/2002 12:56:40 PM PDT
by
Victor
To: kattracks
Let Saddam hide in his bunker 200 feet underground and sweat it out for about the next six months. If we were to zap Bagdad with an electromagnetic pulse,it would get pretty uncomfortable down in that hole without electricity, airconditioning, and any radio or telphone communications.
To: kattracks
will Scott Ritter be going to Baghdad to protect his beloved Saddam?
19
posted on
08/15/2002 1:06:05 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: Bobby777
I could not find this at UPI anybody have a link?
To: kattracks
human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields human shields
To: NorseWood
EMP? ... unnecessary ... cruise missiles can drop carbon fiber over the substations just like they did in 1991 ... this creates a substantial repair job that keeps them offline for awhile ...
22
posted on
08/15/2002 1:11:27 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: kattracks
This is so they can make sure lots of civilians are killed in our attacks. Then they can cry to the Arab world for help and we can expect to pay $2.00 a gallon for regual Unleaded. Wipe out the whole country I say.
23
posted on
08/15/2002 1:12:06 PM PDT
by
Mixer
To: Mixer
regual = regular
24
posted on
08/15/2002 1:13:42 PM PDT
by
Mixer
To: steve-b
"Niedermeyer" I loved the part at the end of Animal House:
Neidermeyer - Class of '64
Shot in Vietnam, by his own troops
Let's hope the same thing happens to Saddam.
To: Mixer
once Saddam and Sons (sounds like a TV show) are dead, the Iraqi people will wipe out the rest of their security forces who have killed for Saddam ... probably 90-95% of the Iraqi military would be relieved to see Saddam gone ...
there's no need to target innocent Iraqi civilians ... surely many of which are living under a ruthless dictator ...
26
posted on
08/15/2002 1:19:09 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: kattracks
So is the Iraqi strategy down to WMD against Israel and Iraqi dissidents combined with a bunker in Bagdad surrounded by human shields?
27
posted on
08/15/2002 1:21:05 PM PDT
by
Ranger
To: Bobby777
If Scott is not up to it? John sure is! He will defend the Regal Beagal to the death!
To: HELLRAISER II
Dittoes - if this isn't reason enough to go after Saddam, what is? You are right, he just needs more human shields. Seems to be a Muslim thing - Hamas does the same thing.
To: My Favorite Headache
"C'mon knock on our door,
we'll be waiting for you,
where the kisses are Saddam's, Uday's and Qusay's,
Three's Company too!"
there's a MAD TV episode in there somewhere!
30
posted on
08/15/2002 1:30:10 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: kattracks
Does that include Bagh-ladies too...sorry had too, the title is too silly...
To: kattracks; Dark Wing
The locals don't want to be in town when Israeli nukes arrive.
32
posted on
08/15/2002 1:30:37 PM PDT
by
Thud
To: LiteKeeper
It's a Coward thing & cowards seem to breed in abundance in the Middle East.
To: Kenton
Realistically speaking, we're gonna have to go a long way to demonstrate the need for killin' up a bunch of civilians; who are otherwise powerless to change their political circumstances. Saddam and his minions are our enemies;, not the entire poulation of Baghdad! Had the total destruction of the city been our objective, we could have done that long ago, with impunity!
To: MD_Willington_1976
you mean - "Iraq orders Baghmommies to stay put"
35
posted on
08/15/2002 1:36:56 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: old school
Think there were any civilians in Dresden during WWII? Thy blowed up real good!
To: Bobby777
you mean - "Iraq orders Baghmommies to stay put"Bagh-ladies? Bagh-people? Soon to be homeless people?
37
posted on
08/15/2002 1:40:00 PM PDT
by
mhking
To: kattracks
But I thought the Iraqis were all ready to "fight to the death". Silly, you misunderstood! They said they are ready to take flight from death, not fight to the death.
To: mhking
hopefully the Iraqis have whispered to one another where the military targets are (the hidden ones I mean that are detected by EMF triangulation) and will be, at least, a few blocks away when the fireworks begin ...
39
posted on
08/15/2002 1:46:09 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: kattracks
I guess the fair citizens of Baghdad know something we don't. Let's see, give up my money and property, or stay around to get vaporized by an Israeli nuke, tough call...
40
posted on
08/15/2002 1:48:29 PM PDT
by
TheDon
To: HELLRAISER II
US-based Human Rights Watch has already issued a 24-page report condemning as a war crime Israel's use of a neighbor to warn a terrorist to surrender. HRW is calling him a human shield. And maybe he was. But I wonder how long it'll take HRW to issue a report condemning Saddam Hussein for using a whole city's population as human shields? Ain't holding my breath.
To: SamAdams76
I'd like to see this reported in another source besides UPI. I seriously question their credibility anymore.
42
posted on
08/15/2002 1:49:07 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: SamAdams76
"I am fortunate that I was born in the United States and not in Iraq."Saddam is fortunate that I was born in the US and not in Iraq, or he would be worm food by now.
Too bad that the average Iraqi has not the courage to kill this monster.
To: Can_It_B_Done
Careful what you ask for. You may already have it.
To: Bobby777
there's no need to target innocent Iraqi civiliansTargeting military assets will be targeting civilians. They will be clustered around the missile launchers and truck parks all over Baghdad for the benefit of American TV. And of course AA guns will be parked in mosques and churches (yes, there are a few) as well as hospitals.
To one such as Saddam the civilians only value is what they can suply to Saddam, goods or money, or protection.
45
posted on
08/15/2002 1:57:11 PM PDT
by
arthurus
To: kattracks
The Nazis did this to Berliners in early 1945, when the war was long over (in terms of which side would win). The people were fleeing from Berlin to the western part of the country, hoping to be captured by American or British compared to the Russians. Violators were shot on sight.
History repeating itself.
To: arthurus
of course that's what Saddam wants ... I think these publications of "imminent attack" are not only signaling resistance groups, they're warning the Iraqi citizens to start running when the shooting starts ...
47
posted on
08/15/2002 2:03:17 PM PDT
by
Bobby777
To: Can_It_B_Done
Why are we not shooting down "anything and everything" that is launched by any other nation unless the US inspects it first? Very similar to Reagan's idea. A bunch of reactionists called it 'Star Wars'.
To: Bobby777
I think these publications of "imminent attack" are not only signaling resistance groups, they're warning the Iraqi citizens to start running when the shooting starts.You got it. The fact that Saddam is doing this indicates that the public is not a bunch of uninformed fanatics ready to die for the cause. Looks like they are as 'fanatically loyal' as is needed to keep out of trouble.
To: Frank_Discussion
Perhaps there was some military goal achieved in the bombing of Dresden, I can't find it! But, even Churchill questioned the morality of it. I suppose that if you can convince the guys who actually drop the bombs of the military necessity, then you're home-free! I don't think you can compare World War II Germany to present-day Iraq, in any event!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson