Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POWELL SAYS SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IS COMPELLING ISSUE FOR THE UNITED STATES
The Washington File ^ | Aug. 12, 2002 | Colin Powell

Posted on 08/16/2002 5:33:46 AM PDT by madfly

08/12/2002

Byliner: Powell Says Sustainable Development
is Compelling Issue for the United States
(Powell article in special edition of U.N. publication) (2090)

(This byliner by U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell appeared in an August 12 special edition of the United Nations Environment Program magazine "Our Planet" and is in the public domain. No republication restrictions.)

(begin byliner)

Only One Earth

Colin L. Powell

The World Summit on Sustainable Development comes barely 20 months after we welcomed in the new century. Despite the stories and images of trouble we read in our newspapers and view on our television screens, this is a time of great opportunities to expand peace, prosperity and freedom. The spread of democracy and market economies, combined with breakthroughs in technology, permits us to dream of a day when, for the first time in history, most of humanity will be free of the ravages of tyranny and poverty.

We live in a century of promise. Our responsibility now is to turn it into a century of hopes fulfilled, a century of sustained and sustainable development that enriches all our peoples without impoverishing our planet. When we talk of sustainable development, we are talking of the means to unlock human potential through the interlocking threads of economic development based on sound economic policies, social development based on investment in health and education, and responsible stewardship of the environment. Sustainable development is for the United States, and for me personally, a compelling moral and humanitarian issue.

But sustainable development is also a security imperative. Poverty, environmental degradation and despair are destroyers - of people, of societies, of nations. This unholy trinity can destabilize countries, even entire regions. A decade ago, at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 172 countries adopted a wide-ranging blueprint for action to achieve sustainable development worldwide. While there have been ups and downs, and progress has been uneven, we have seen real improvements since then.

For example, over the past decade, the proportion of people in developing countries struggling to make ends meet on less than $1 per day has dropped from 29 per cent to 24 per cent. Infant mortality has declined by more than 10 per cent, and mortality among children under five is nearly 20 per cent less.

Countries that have opened their economies have done better than those that remain closed. A World Bank study found that over the course of the 1990s, the 24 developing countries that increased their global trade and investment most also increased income per person much more than those that did not - six percentage points more, in fact. In those countries, the number of people living on less than $1 per day dropped by 120 million between 1993 and 1998. We have also seen the conclusion and implementation of important environmental agreements, such as those to reduce substances harmful to the air we breathe and to control the spread of deserts.

But, while we have progressed along the road to hope, we have far to go in a world where one person in five still suffers in extreme poverty, where a baby's chances of surviving to adulthood still depends on the accident of where he or she is born, and where illegal logging still devastates forests.

Mapping the way forward

Over the past nine months, a series of major conferences and negotiations has helped map the way forward. The Doha Development Round of World Trade Organization negotiations, the World Food Summit review conference in Rome, and the G8 Summit in Canada all forged stronger agreement on the path to development. The 'Monterrey Consensus', adopted by leaders and ministers from 171 countries at the United Nations Conference on Financing and Development, was an historic affirmation of the need to mobilize all sources of development financing, which also proclaimed the centrality of 'sound policies, good governance at all levels, and rule of law' to sustainable development. As Hernando De Soto has so aptly said, 'the hidden architecture of sustainable development [is] the law'. The next stop on this long road is the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg.

The United States will be taking three very important messages to Johannesburg. First and foremost, we are committed to supporting sustainable development. President Bush left no doubt on this score in his March 14 speech at the InterAmerican Development Bank, when he stated on behalf of the American people that: 'the advance of development is a central commitment of American foreign policy'.

We will also carry the message that sustainable development must begin at home, with sound policies and good governance. Both official assistance and private capital are most effective when they go to governments that rule justly, invest in their people, and encourage economic freedom.

Official assistance is important. That is why President Bush announced that the Administration will seek Congressional approval to increase America's core development assistance by 50 per cent over the next three years, resulting in a $5 billion annual increase over current levels. These additional funds will go to a new Millennium Challenge Account that will fund initiatives to help developing nations that are strongly committed to good governance, the health and education of their people, and good economic policies that foster enterprise and entrepreneurship.

But, as important as official assistance is to improving people's lives, trade and private capital flows are even more significant. Trade dwarfs aid. America alone buys $450 billion in goods from the developing world every year, some eight times the amount developing countries receive in aid from all sources.

Official development assistance is also only a fraction of private capital flows. In 1999, for example, the private sector accounted for 82 per cent of the nearly $300 billion in long-term resource flows to developing countries. Attracting this money isn't easy. Capital is a coward. It flees from corruption and bad policies, conflict and unpredictability. It shuns ignorance, disease and illiteracy. Capital goes where it is welcomed and where investors can be confident of a return on the resources they have put at risk. It goes to countries where women can work, children can read, and entrepreneurs can dream.

Seizing opportunities

But good policies alone are not enough. People must be able to seize the opportunities. So the third message we will take to Johannesburg is that governments, civil society and the private sector must work in partnership to mobilize development resources to unleash human productivity, reduce poverty, promote healthy environments and foster sustainable growth.

We are already deploying the power of partnerships. For example, the United States and South Africa have initiated the Congo Basin Forest Partnership. This innovative partnership with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), industry, and other governments, will help slow and even reverse deforestation in the Congo Basin. It will not only create national parks where none before existed, but will also ensure the livelihoods of those living in and around the forest and strengthen the ability of governments to enforce their forest conservation laws.

The New Nigeria Foundation is a unique partnership linking oil companies, NGOs and local communities on issues ranging from information technology to agriculture. The Water for the Poor Alliance marries the resources and leadership of the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation with civil society and USAID to provide potable water to 400,000 rural West Africans.

We also support the Access Initiative, in which the World Resources Institute has partnered with more than 25 civil society organizations in nine countries to assess how well governments are providing access to information, permitting public participation, and providing justice to their citizens. America's vision for Johannesburg is to build on these three messages - commitment, good policies and partnerships - by inviting developed and developing nations to join us in opening our economies and societies to growth, for growth is the key to raising people out of poverty. We will also invite developed and developing nations to join us in providing freedom, security and hope for present and future generations, while providing all our people with the opportunity for healthy and productive lives.

And, recognizing that we have only one home, and it is Earth, we will invite developed and developing nations to join us in serving as good stewards of our natural resources and our environment.

To this end, we will initially work for concrete actions in seven areas essential to sustainable development - health, energy, water, sustainable agriculture and rural development, education, oceans and coastal management, and forests. We will work to unite governments, the private sector and civil society in partnership to strengthen democratic institutions of governance, open markets, and mobilize and use all development resources more effectively.

We are already doing a great deal in these areas. For example, the United States has provided $500 million to the Global Fund to Fight HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria; launched a $500 million Mother and Child HIV/AIDS Prevention initiative for Africa and the Caribbean; doubled funds for the African Education Initiative for training and scholarships; and increased funding for agricultural development assistance programs by 25 per cent.

In our budget request for Fiscal Year 2003, we have asked for $4.5 billion for climate spending, an increase of $700 million over this year. This request includes funding for basic science, technology research and development, business and agriculture incentives, and international activities. President Bush has also taken the lead in creating a new international norm to increase the use of grants instead of loans for the poorest countries, especially in assistance from multilateral development banks. This approach, endorsed by the leaders of the industrialized countries at the recent G8 Summit, will complement existing initiatives to help alleviate the crushing burden of debt facing highly indebted poor countries.

Combining assets

But in all of these areas, we can and must do more. We need governments, businesses and the organizations of civil society, individually and in partnerships, to work in support of these pressing human needs. That is why we established the Global Development Alliance to combine the assets of government, business and civil society to work in partnership on implementing sustainable development programs. Sustainable development is a marathon, not a sprint. It does not follow from a single event like the Johannesburg Summit, important as it is, but from a sustained global effort by many players over a long period of time. Sustainable development requires institutions, policies, people and effective partnerships to carry our common effort beyond Johannesburg and far into the future.

The United States is committed to building a world where children can grow up free from hunger, disease and illiteracy. A world where all men and women can reach their human potential free from racial or gender discrimination. A world where all people can enjoy the richness of a diverse and healthy planet. And a world of hopes fulfilled for all God's children

(end byliner)

(Distributed by the Office of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov) NNNN



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; colinpowell; enviralists; johanbesburg; oneearth; ourplanet; powellwatch; sustainability; unitednations; unlist; unmagazine; unpublication
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last
Byliner: Powell Says Sustainable Development is Compelling Issue for the United States
(Powell article in special edition of U.N. publication) (2090)

August 12 special edition of the
United Nations Environment Program magazine "Our Planet"
and is in the public domain.
No republication restrictions.

1 posted on 08/16/2002 5:33:47 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libertarianize the GOP; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Stand Watch Listen; freefly; expose; ...
Johannesburg ping!
2 posted on 08/16/2002 5:35:18 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scuttlebutt; MedProf; LadyX; Vigilant1; AnnaZ; Lazamataz; Sir Gawain; Mercuria; hogwaller; ...
ping
3 posted on 08/16/2002 5:36:17 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
That is why we established the Global Development Alliance to combine the assets of government, business and civil society to work in partnership on implementing sustainable development programs.

Pardon me whilst I'm sick in the corner. The next thing he needs to do is sing the Internationale.

Regards, Ivan

4 posted on 08/16/2002 5:36:29 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; agitator; Congressman Billybob; The Shrew; It'salmosttolate; governsleastgovernsbest; ...
ping
5 posted on 08/16/2002 5:37:29 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark Bahner; Mark Turbo; MeeknMing; michaelje; Mulder; Nateman; NC_Libertarian; nightdriver; ...
Johannesburg ping!
6 posted on 08/16/2002 5:40:49 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo; goldstategop; dead; Warren; INSENSITIVE GUY; Paul Atreides; ...
Johannesburg ping!
7 posted on 08/16/2002 5:48:06 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BTTT!!!!!!
8 posted on 08/16/2002 5:49:04 AM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Compelling issue? Compelling?

This babble is nearly a direct quote from Bill Clinton's and Kofi Annan's recent speeches. Did we change presidents and secretaries of state several years ago? It appears not.

9 posted on 08/16/2002 5:52:24 AM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
"But sustainable development is also a security imperative. Poverty, environmental degradation and despair are destroyers - of people, of societies, of nations. This unholy trinity can destabilize countries..."

And the MAJOR cause of poverty, environmental degradation and despair is SOCIALISM. Look at the parts of the Soviet Union, the east European nations they once controlled, and the current Communist countries of east Asia--they ALL suffered from poverty, environmental degradation, and despair FAR WORSE than ever occurred under "evil capitalism" or "evil colonialism". And yet the promulgators of "sustainable development" would have us believe that the CURE for the problems is MORE SOCIALISM, when the REAL answer is INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY and governments that protect individual and property rights.

10 posted on 08/16/2002 5:52:35 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The one commie in our administration
11 posted on 08/16/2002 5:52:45 AM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ppaul; toenail
Johannesburg ping!
12 posted on 08/16/2002 5:56:40 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
The United States is committed to building a world where children can grow up free from hunger, disease and illiteracy.
Since those things haven't been done in the US what makes you think that it can be done worldwide Colin?
A world where all men and women can reach their human potential free from racial or gender discrimination.
Same question!
A world where all people can enjoy the richness of a diverse and healthy planet.
People can already enjoy "the richness of a diverse and healthy planet". You and the UN just want to meddle.
And a world of hopes fulfilled for all God's children
Some around the world don't admit to being G_d's children much less believing in G_d. How do you propose to resolving this issue? Forced religion?

Since when is it the job of the US to "change the world"? We'd best get the leaks fixed in our own boat fixed first.
And this...
The spread of democracy and market economies, combined with breakthroughs in technology, permits us to dream of a day when, for the first time in history, most of humanity will be free of the ravages of tyranny and poverty.
Spread of democracy my happy a$$! And our own "market economy" is doing real well right now isn't it, thanks to liars and cheats! Shall that "knowledge" be exported too? As long as there are governments there will never be an end to the ravages of tyranny. And freedom from the ravages of poverty? Dear G_d, you're still fighting the failed War on Poverty.
Your War on Poverty is impoverishing Americans!

!NUTS

13 posted on 08/16/2002 6:01:30 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Time for Mr. Bush to tell Mr. Powell to leave.
14 posted on 08/16/2002 6:13:13 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Sustainable Development means...
Introduction to Sustainable Development
Sustainable development means different things to different people, but the most frequently quoted definition is from the report Our Common Future (also known as the Brundtland Report): 1
"Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs."

Disaster Planning Introduction
Development continues unabated in the riskiest of areas, along the coasts and floodplains in the U.S. Communities in these high-risk regions, by definition, are not sustainable. Residents cannot count on the communities’ survival for generations to come. Some live in fear that the next rain or wind storm could mean the end of normal life. These are people and communities at risk, locked in a costly, life-threatening gamble with the environment.
Sustainable development offers a way out. For some communities, the only solution is relocation, moving entirely off the floodplain, out of harm’s way. For others, sustainable development means restricting new construction in particularly vulnerable areas, elevating structures to remove the threat of flooding, or building smarter, stronger buildings that are more hazard-resistant.

THE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Sustainable development means integrating the decision-making process across your organization, so that every decision is made with an eye to the greatest long-term benefits. It means eliminating the concept of waste -- thinking "cradle-to-cradle" rather than "cradle-to-grave," (4) and building on natural processes and energy flows and cycles; recognizing the interrelationship of our actions with the natural world.

Sustainable Development
Reducing poverty through sustainable development is a global strategic priority for the survival of our planet. For the World Bank this means dealing with the comprehensive nature of development. This approach is reflected in the implementation of projects and programs in partnership with the public and private sectors, and civil society. Participation, empowerment, strengthened institutions, environmental protection and conservation, and focus on the rural poor are all foundations for sustained and inclusive economic growth.

Sustainable Development means Business

Sustainable Development means whatever anyone wants it to mean apparently!
Orwell lives!

15 posted on 08/16/2002 6:20:55 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
The link for this UN article, is for the US Embassy website in Bucharest, Romania. (Huh?) This is marked "no reproductive restrictions." This must be how propaganda is spread througout UN nation states stating the US is gung ho for Global Governance.
Yet yesterday the US gets info that Bush snubs Polluting Globalists, to make us think Bush is speaking for Americans.

Global Spin Zone, sigh


16 posted on 08/16/2002 6:22:50 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madfly; All
This information is valuable, and needs to be passed along to others-- please note:

My ISP had been rejecting emails from me since yesterday, so I cannot send the usual mass emails to editors & opinionators.

If you want to take a crack at email activism, look here:

Ignorance Making You Ill? Cure It!

for links, tools, & instructions about how to contact a pile of different people, and how to send a link to this story right here ( or anywhere else ) to a "mass email" using Outlook Express.

17 posted on 08/16/2002 6:37:34 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madfly
USAID
Access Initiative
World Resources Institute
Water for the Poor Alliance
Global Development Alliance
Conrad N. Hilton Foundation
Congo Basin Forest Partnership

Our responsibility now is to turn it into a century of hopes fulfilled, a century of sustained and sustainable development that enriches all our peoples without impoverishing our planet.

Every country must want to achieve what they are capable of, America cannot do it for them.

An economist at Columbia, professor Sala-i-Martin, stresses the fact that focusing on countries rather than people will distort the truth. Africa* is doing poorly, but China has more than twice the population (whose lower income population is growing only second in the world to America's). His theory, income by individuals provides a more valid perspective. The rich continue to become wealthier, but so do the poor, only at a slower pace. Unlike the Leftist propaganda, the poor did not become poorer, they also got richer!

*Africa - political corruption is prevention economic prosperity

18 posted on 08/16/2002 7:00:56 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
If you do a Google search for the title of the UN Article,
Powell Says Sustainable Development is Compelling Issue for the United States

You will find that it is posted on various US embassy sites, ONE WEEK before Johannesburg!

US Embassies: Tokyo, Calcutta, Jakarta, USEU.be?; US Embassy.hr?;UK, Honk Kong; CH;TR;Italy;

But I'm so comforted by the constant updates on Jason Priestlie's recovery and Elvis fanatics that the media BIAS chooses to serve up this week.

SCREW THE UN

19 posted on 08/16/2002 7:02:56 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: madfly; MadIvan; philman_36; backhoe; Travis McGee; Squantos; sneakypete; joanie-f; Dukie; ...
Sustainable development is the globalists code word for controlled development. And they have many useful idiots employed (via environmentalists, etc) to try and bring it about through NGO's.

Make no mistake ... it does not lead to liberty or anything similar to it.

They mean to rule us and this is one of their principle avenues towards it right now.

Compelling indeed Colin ... compelling is the operative word here.

20 posted on 08/16/2002 7:09:03 AM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Sustainable development is the globalists code word for controlled development.

Precisely, and no industrial revolution, no climb out of the primordial swamp of subsistence agriculture to modernity, is by nature "controlled". It is a wild, rampant thing that defies control. It's not called a "sustainable market" but the "free market".

Powell has apparently heard the siren call of global socialism and bureaucratism. Sack him. And bring in Dr. Keyes!

Regards, Ivan

21 posted on 08/16/2002 7:15:39 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Sustainable development is the globalists code word for controlled development.
Just one of the tentacle words of the globalist octopus.
One big umbrella over that octopus too.
22 posted on 08/16/2002 7:19:22 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Controlled development. Hmmmmm where have we seen that before? Thats right! In the Soviet Union! Sustainable development is the globalists word for GLOBAL COMMUNISM. Civil Society is the globalists code word for the good old fashioned soviet council, where the politburo and the government work hand in hand to erase any form of self determination among the unannointed, and create the bureacracies and policies like those that starved and forced submission of the Russian people in the last century.

Yep, the GLOBAL VISION sure sounds good for America and Americans.
23 posted on 08/16/2002 7:28:16 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
The spread of democracy and market economies, combined with breakthroughs in technology, permits us to dream of a day when, for the first time in history, most of humanity will be free of the ravages of tyranny and poverty.

THey confuse business and religious messianism. Business was never a religious or cultist goal. These people are nuts indeed.

COMPLETELY NUTS. CAll the ambulance.


24 posted on 08/16/2002 7:30:12 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Jeff, do you have any experience with a municipal gov't. that adopts "home rule" status? Our local gov't. is pushing for it and my gut tells me it's a prelude to more annexations under the guise of sustainable development.
25 posted on 08/16/2002 7:34:13 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
Part of the umbrella...SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

A couple of tentacles...
sustainable urban development
sustainable transportation development

26 posted on 08/16/2002 7:37:21 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Sustainable development - what is it?
The evolution of sustainable corporations is no further along than aviation was when Wilbur and Orville were still running their cycle shop. Just as their dreams seemed impossible to most people, so do the dreams of SD pioneers today. But expect explosive growth in sustainability experimentation in the next decade. Many of these experiments will involve new technology, but an even greater number will involve ‘soft innovation’, focusing on new forms of strategic thinking, new styles of networked commerce, and radically new triple bottom line management systems, accountancy procedures and reporting and communication process.

There is a twist. The article even uses the blind people and the elephant analogy.
A whole site to the quasi-god SustainAbility

As you can see this stuff makes me see Red...er...red.

27 posted on 08/16/2002 7:43:59 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Yep, the GLOBAL VISION sure sounds good for America and Americans.
America and Americans are going to get poked in the eye with a sharp stick and be blinded with GLOBAL VISION before it's all over with.
28 posted on 08/16/2002 7:46:45 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
sustainable development only benefits those who are in control of the economics. As for the people sustainable development equates socialism because opportunity to improve their economics is beyond their control. Sustainable development is also equated to the rampant environmentalists who are confiscating land for parks and the buffer zones to shield the wild from human incursion, shield resources from private enterprise, and eliminate free enterprise that revolves upon anything that is produced by the land.
29 posted on 08/16/2002 7:47:22 AM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: madfly; Carry_Okie
And to think the republicans were falling all over themselves to get this socialist to run as Bush's VP...

For a military man, Powell doesn't seem to know his history.

30 posted on 08/16/2002 7:55:35 AM PDT by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
Sustainable Development: How to Make It Work
Most development is still the result of thousands of local decisions made by individual communities about separate projects. Development regulations in the U. S. have traditionally been delegated by the states to local government, and home rule on development issues is strongly established and unlikely to change. Private real-estate investments in separate, competing developments have been the prime mechanism for urban growth; that is not likely to change either.
31 posted on 08/16/2002 7:57:51 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Thanks, I bookmarked the article for future reference. Not sure how much experience you've had with home rule but I'm still wondering if there can be an abuse of power if city hall becomes inundated with land and revenue hungry officials. Seems like a small cabal of insiders could make life miserable for everyone through a blizzard of codes and regulations, insider deals, etc.
32 posted on 08/16/2002 8:08:39 AM PDT by american spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan
Time for Mr. Bush to tell Mr. Powell to leave.

-------------------------------

Bush has been making the same speech/

33 posted on 08/16/2002 8:19:03 AM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: madfly; *Enviralists; *Powell_Watch; *UN_List
Index Bump
34 posted on 08/16/2002 8:30:20 AM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free the USA
bttt
35 posted on 08/16/2002 8:40:02 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ME4W
ping
36 posted on 08/16/2002 8:40:48 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
and this crap is supposed to turn Saddam into a lamb? Bwahahah!!
37 posted on 08/16/2002 8:50:12 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head; madfly
Fortunately for us all, Socialism is a Religion of Peace.
38 posted on 08/16/2002 9:05:55 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; knighthawk
Ping. This is what is making the rounds at our US Embassies in UN Nation States. Powell wrote this for a special UN magazine and it is being posted the week before Johannesburg!!!!
39 posted on 08/16/2002 9:07:25 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
and this crap is supposed to turn Saddam into a lamb?
A key concept...supposed to. It won't, but it sure "sounds good on paper".
40 posted on 08/16/2002 9:13:12 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Bump what you said and BTTT
41 posted on 08/16/2002 9:21:48 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
Not sure how much experience you've had with home rule but I'm still wondering if there can be an abuse of power if city hall becomes inundated with land and revenue hungry officials.
None at all. Read a lot about it though, but no actual "experience". I'm in a blue zone. Why bother, it's an entrenched mentality. My participation won't help diddly. I'm estranged enough as it is.
Seems like a small cabal of insiders could make life miserable for everyone through a blizzard of codes and regulations, insider deals, etc.
Let's see...locally, several years ago, a certain mayor/former mayor bought lots of land zoned mainly as an industrial area. Years later that land is being bought and devoloped because the zoning was changed.
Some are surely making money from zoning changes. I'm sure it happens quite frequently too.
42 posted on 08/16/2002 9:25:33 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
bttt
43 posted on 08/16/2002 9:30:02 AM PDT by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
City of Port Arthur, Texas Ordinance No. 79-78
But, by golly, we're working towards "sustainability"!
44 posted on 08/16/2002 9:44:37 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Thanksalot. I just had dinner and now I am feeling sick. This also makes me want to rip out my eyes so I can no longer read this kind of stuff. Is he serious or what?
45 posted on 08/16/2002 10:16:38 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Tom Jefferson; backhoe; Militiaman7; BARLF; timestax; imintrouble; cake_crumb; Brad's Gramma; ...
This article contains barfable material in huge amounts. Read it at your own risk.

Get the UN and Powell out of the US and to Cuba, where this sort of stuff belongs-list

If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
46 posted on 08/16/2002 10:19:27 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RLK
Then it's game over, and we are doomed. This is the crown jewel of the globofacist enviro movement in their plans to establish their worldwide Holy Gaian Empire. If Bush is pushing this, there is no one else powerful enough at the Fed level to stop it.
47 posted on 08/16/2002 10:46:01 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
If you don't mind, I am going to steal that, that is a good response to the goofballs that are promoting it here.
48 posted on 08/16/2002 10:49:52 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes; 2sheep; Jeremiah Jr; babylonian; Prodigal Daughter; happygrl; Simcha7
Fortunately for us all, Socialism is a Religion of Peace.

Peace through submission.

49 posted on 08/16/2002 10:56:22 AM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I get the feeling Powell was a concession GW had to make in order to get the world bank/global economist support for his 2000 win.

What Powell is preaching here, what he is cheerleading with this speech, is just the sort of thing the antichrist needs to ascend his throne - one world, one government, one religion.

I highly recommend Escape the Coming Night(Note this cover: It is of the two World Trade Center towers in flames...book published in 1999...this cover has been replaced now.)

50 posted on 08/16/2002 10:56:23 AM PDT by .30Carbine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson