Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The disaster will be the cost. Incredible cost. Never before seen costs.

And for insurance (since they aren't positive).

1 posted on 08/16/2002 1:49:55 PM PDT by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: The Raven
The weather is changing but I would just call it global extreme temperatures. Most of the year was very cold and this summer has been very hot.
2 posted on 08/16/2002 1:51:40 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Good summary.
3 posted on 08/16/2002 1:55:44 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
“global temperature variations during the past century are virtually all due to the variations in solar activity.”

The Sun causes temperatures on Earth to increase? Who'd a thunk it?

All this time, I thought it was my SUV that caused the seasons to change.

7 posted on 08/16/2002 2:08:47 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Whitehouse CEQ Tightens Control over EPA Science Policy(#4)
9 posted on 08/16/2002 2:18:54 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
BUMP
10 posted on 08/16/2002 2:22:37 PM PDT by Mike Darancette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
POLAR AERONOMY AND RADIO SCIENCE(PARS) ULF/ELF/VLF PROJECT.

STAR Labatory,Stanford University. PROBING with HARRP.

read what this does to global warming!
12 posted on 08/16/2002 2:29:18 PM PDT by BossyRoofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
The enviro's were hoping to secure treaties, legislation and control of most everything before enough time went by for the flawed science to be apparent.

The idea is to present political dogma as "scientific" fact. If enough poitico/pseudo-scientists agree then the rest better fall inline - if they value a career and credibility.

It's been done for a century with pronounced effects on our society. If you can get just one generation to accept enviro-whaco theories.....
18 posted on 08/16/2002 2:53:09 PM PDT by martian_22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
I read a story that said that the hole in the ozone layer was reported long before freon was invented and those liars @ the EPA convinced us to change.What's in it for the EPA with this again another lie about a global warming trend?A
political and financial gain for those in EPa seems to be a certain reality>one thing is for sure,you can't get all those climatologists to agree that a warming trend is going on.
19 posted on 08/16/2002 3:17:44 PM PDT by borntofly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
Read the real truth about enviromentalist whackoisms

The Skeptical Environmentalist: Measuring the Real State of the World
by Bjorn Lomborg (Author)


see larger photo
List Price: $28.00
Our Price: $19.60
You Save: $8.40 (30%)

  Eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $49. See details.

Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours

Edition: Paperback | All Editions

THIS BOOK IS GREAT IF YA WANNA LEARN THE REAL STATS AND REAL MYTHS ABOUT THE ENVIROMENT

37 posted on 08/16/2002 5:44:08 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven
One thing I never hear about is the self-regulating temperature method of Mother Nature.

If the earth heats up, more water is evaporated, creating clouds and the earth cools.(remember the "nuclear winter" scenario?) Once the temperature reaches some happy medium, the clouds dissipate, and the earth warms. To me, this explains the temperature cycles seen in the small amount of historical data that does exist.

Simple physics will react to any intervention man could create.

44 posted on 08/17/2002 12:51:32 AM PDT by wcbtinman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

enviro- self-ping.


51 posted on 11/11/2005 11:22:54 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: The Raven

The trouble with their arguments is this: As winds blow
accross the US, they lose carbon dioxide. The air over the
Atlantic contains less carbon dioxide that that over the
Pacific. I found this in a book "The Bottomless Well" by
Huber and Mills who cite a recent article in Science.

Somehow we soak up more carbon dioxide than we emit. We are
the good guys.


52 posted on 11/12/2005 12:05:23 AM PST by RWCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson