Posted on 08/19/2002 3:45:27 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
Guess he would. However, he'd probably change his mind on Amish also ,if they hit his university.
Coming next week; Why Josef Stalin was missunderstood by the West and should be proclaimed a Saint by the Russian Orthodx Church.
Also on the darwing boards: Adolf Hitler anti-semite or missunderstood artist?
Gary Leupp
Associate Professor of History
Email: gary.leupp@tufts.edu
Tel: (617) 627-2426
Education
- B.A. University of Hawaii (1978).
- M.A. University of Hawaii (1980).
- Ph.D. University of Michigan (1989).
Major Publications
- Servants, Shophands, and Laborers in the Cities of Tokugawa Japan (1992).
- Male Colors: The Construction of Homosexuality in Tokugawa Japan (1995).
Research in Progress
- Weaving Workshops in Tokugawa Kyoto
- Urban Gang Violence in Tokugawa Japan
- Ethnic Consciousness and Race-Mixing in Early Modern Japan
Courses
- History 47 - Japan from Prehistory to 1868
- History 48 - Japan from 1868 to the Present
- History 133 - Japanese History from Literature
- History 134 - Tokugawa Japan
- History 135 - Gender and Sexuality in Japanese History
- History 182GL - Religion in Japanese History
Just wondering
This nutso, a card-carrying Communist, is a darling of neo-nazis and revisionists, along with fellow nutsos Noam Chomsky and Israel Shahak.
I guess better to make up history than teach real history.
As someone has already noted, we don't see Christian or Jewish fundamentalists homicide-bombing shopping centers and pizzerias, nor flying airliners into office towers. Nor does Christian sacred literature ever counsel Christians to treat any human being, of whatever faith, with deceit and violence, as the Koran does -- no matter what marginal adjustments Professor Leupp wants to make to our interpretation of "infidel."
Whether Islam is the root cause -- a phrase leftists love -- of violent Islamic expansionism, or whether it's just the dominant rationalization for something these savages would do anyway, it is demonstrably an unworthy religion that fails to meet the universal temporal standard of justification for all religious creeds: curbing the excesses of its adherents.
For more thoughts along these lines, please see:
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
Typical left wing scare tactic. They want to equivicate conservative Christians with the terrorists who murdered 3000 innocents on 9-11. The point of this artice isn't to enlighten his students about Islamisists, it's to scare them away from conservative Christians by equating the two.
Anybody whose been in college within the past 30 years can spot this phony-ness a mile waya.
However he has presented rather well the dominant "Liberal" paradigm.
This is a paradigm that is widely accepted as fact by millions of Americans. It is a delusional system, based largely on denial and false premises, and dangerous because it ignores reality.
"Some...criticize Islam (appropriately, in my view) for what they consider backward and reactionary features. This is not the place to deal with such criticisms, nor am I the right person to do it."Leupp is definitely not the right person to do this because he can not see the realities, blinded as he is by delusion, denial, and paradigm paralysis.
However, this article is the place to deal with such criticisms.
Leupp obviously cannot see and denies the importance of the backward and reactionary features inherent in and basic to Islam. The September 11 massacre stripped away the illusions that millions of people had about Islam and Muslims--i.e. they became disillusioned--but Leupp experienced no such epiphany.
Islam is a imperialist movement, committed to world domination, to intolerance, and to violence and war as strategy. Leupp is unable or unwilling to recognize this, and evidently so are the millions of "Liberals" who are deluded by the same "Liberal" paradigm.
"Christendom underwent the Enlightenment-an evolution towards secularism, rationalism, and scientific thought in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries-which the Islamic world, in general, has not yet experienced. To become "modern" (more specifically, to become capitalist), the West had to become more ideologically tolerant (i.e., less religious), and allow a freer market in ideas than had been possible when the Church monopolized learning. "This is an extremely important point.
Leupp obviously does not recognize its importance.
His mind immediately jumps to the brutality and intolerance of Christians centuries ago--witch hunts, the Inquisition, even the Crusades, which for most people in the West are ancient history, hardly relevant in today's world.
The point that is overriding in its importance is that in contemporary Western Civilization, the fruits of the Enlightenment are taken for granted. They are accepted. Secularism, rationalism, and scientific thought--freedom of religion, freedom of speech, seperation of religion and state, a free market of ideas, tolerance--are the accepted norm in the West.
This is not true in the Islamic world.
The Church has not monopolized learning in the West for centuries.
Leupp is so horrified by the residual currents of Christian fundamentalism in Western society, that he cannot understand the relative impotence and unimportance of such fundamentalism in the West and the strength, power, and importance of fundamentalism in the Islamic world. He cannot resist equating the two. He cannot bring himself to believe the obvious truth: that Christian fundamentalism is of practically no threat but that the threat of Islamic fundamentalism is real and cannot be overemphasized.
"If mullahs monopolize education in much of the Muslim world, they serve a function identical with that of Europe's medieval Catholic clergy. "Here again, Leupp cannot see the reality of the situation.
He compares the control of religious fundamentalists in contemporary Islamic theocracies with the control of the Catholic clergy in medieval Europe. The two are centuries apart.
He cannot see the effects of the Enlightenment on Western Civilization. And he is blind to the absence of such effects in the Islamic world.
He assumes that the Islamic world will experience such effects ("an evolution towards secularism, rationalism, and scientific thought in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries-which the Islamic world, in general, has not yet experienced") as he completely ignores the possibility that the Islamic world has no intention of experiencing such effects, may never do so, and is openly determined to reverse such effects once it conquers the West.
"The American people are, I submit, far more threatened by Christian fundamentalism than its Islamic counterpart."This is the crux of Leupp's argument and its basic fallacy.
Thought he is correct that "our Enlightenment is not irreversable", he cannot see the vast improbability of that.
The fruits of the Enlightenment are deeply intreanched in Western Civilization and have replaced religious fundamentalism though not religion.
In fact--this is quite close to the crux of the conflict between Islam and the West.
It is true that Muslims would like to replace Christianity and all other religious with Islam, but it is equally important for them to replace the Enlightenment with fundamentalism!
Leupp's article is a good explanation of the warped thinking of contemporary "Liberals".
Blinded by delusions and denial, obsessed with the brutality and intolerance of Christians centuries ago, they cannot see the vast differences between the "Enlightened" West of the 21st century and the intolerant, imperialist, Dark Age world of contemporary Islam.
Of even more importance, blinded as they are by the "Liberal" delusional system, they cannot comprehend the serious threat that Islamic imperialism poses to the entire world.
They ignore the superiority of Western Civilization to Islam and the need to defend and protect it.
They ignore the determination of Muslims to overthrow Western Civilization, constitutional government, liberty, and the Enlightenment--along with all other religions--and to replace it all with a worldwide Islamic fundamentalist theocracy, with the Koran as its only constitution and the sharia as its law.
Because of the delusional "Liberal" paradigm--which blinds "Liberals" to the dangerous realities of the 21st century--"Liberals" and "Liberalism" constitute the single greatest threat to the world today. They are the enablers of those--notably though certainly not exclusively Muslims--who would reverse the Enlightenment and destroy Western Civilization.
Unwittingly, Gary Leupp has explained the delusional "Liberal" paradigm rather well. In doing so, he has revealed the foolishness of this "Liberal" paradigm and those who accept it and just why those who think clearly and are willing to see reality overwhelming reject this foolish paradigm and are way ahead of "Liberals" and far superior to them in evaluating the reality of the dangerous world in which we all live today.
Okay, I gues that means those Arab armies heading into France in 732 were just looking for some cheese to go with their wine, that the conquest of Sicily and the sack of Rome in the 9th century by Arabs was just something we should get over, that Moslem pirates on the coast of the Riviera were really misled by their travel agent, that the destruction of the Holy Sepulchre by the Turks some decades before the First Crusade is just an example of urban renewal, and that the descendants of all the Christians and Africans enslaved by Arabs and Turks for over a thousand years will soon get reparations.
Ha! This guy call himself a professor of history? So the Crusaders are the bad guys after all this? You don't think that they might have been provoked? Does he really think that it's okay for Arabs and Moslems to do whatever they want to infidels? Is Western Civilization not perfect enpough for his refined sensibilities? Would he have preferred that we just surrender, have Charles Martel hand over the keys to the city, keep the Ottomans from all the wasteful spending on cannons by opening the gates of Constantinople, let John Sobieski use his Polish cavalry to batter down the gates of Vienna so the Turks can have a nice visit, just give Spain back to the Arabs and have Columbus find the New World for those nice people (who would never hurt or enslave anyone, unlike the Spanish), and send over American sailors to the Barbary Coast so we can improve their navy for them and then they wouldn't be tempted to raid our ships?
It's not us; it's them!!!! For the last ten thousandth time, they have the problem, professor, not us!!!!
If he were an isolated example of foolishness, he could be dismissed--and, in fact, this particular man can be.
However, millions of Americans have also locked themselves into the same "Liberal" paradigm and are blind to the truth outside it.
"Never underestimate the power of denial."Alan Ball. American Beauty. Directed by Sam Mendes. Dreamworks. 1999.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.