Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stiff Tobacco Taxes Inspire Flourishing Black Market in Cigarettes
CAL-TAX DIGEST ^ | June 2001 | James P. Sweeney

Posted on 08/27/2002 6:24:20 PM PDT by Leisler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: SheLion
HooRah! Let them eat dirt :)
21 posted on 08/27/2002 8:02:39 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: theoriginalgriff
When my godmother was in boarding school in Europe, she and her brother used to make money by selling to their fellow students the cigarettes they'd bought at duty-free shops in airports.
22 posted on 08/27/2002 8:15:09 PM PDT by NovemberCharlie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
In California, a black and gray market in tobacco products already was costing the state an estimated $50 million when voters approved Proposition 10, an initiative that more than doubled the tobacco tax rates as well as more that doubling the amount of money that can be made in the black and gray Davis market.

The government's usual reaction is to increase enforcement, which eats into the tax revenues and further harrasses the law-abiding citizens who are paying the taxes and the businesses that have to collect them. The only real winners are the crooks and the government employees that the crooks pay off.

23 posted on 08/27/2002 8:22:29 PM PDT by eggman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonaparte
Of course, the legislature is goofy enough to make smoking completely illegal in California, even in one's own home. I wouldn't put it past them for one a minute.

There's a law in the CA Legislature at this very moment which would raise the smoking age to 21. It's not going to pass because the state needs the tax revenue desperately, but if it had come up a year or two ago, when the state had a huge surplus, I'll bet it would have passed.

24 posted on 08/27/2002 8:55:48 PM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
"They're trying to explain what they see as an unusual drop in consumption data by saying there hasn't been a change in smoking prevalence and there has been a huge change in the amount people are smoking," said Dr. John Pierce, a professor of cancer prevention at the University of California, San Diego.

Smoking Californians should start lobbying immediately to have Professor Ostrich put in charge of all tobacco consumption "studies" in the state. He has to make the assertion that there's been a "huge change" in the amount people are smoking to validate the effectiveness of "cancer prevention" experts."

In the meantime, the taxes keep going higher, more people find a way to avoid them, and eventually the tobacco tax dollars the state gets diminishes to a dribble.

Dr. Pierce said he found no evidence of a significant black market in a massive cigarette consumption study he recently completed for the state. But he said his data was collected in 1999, and did not attempt to measure any counterfeiting, which was discovered in February 2000.

He's probably completely unaware of Internet sales, too. More tax dollars down the black hole known as "academia." How do you do a "study" on tobacco consumption trends without factoring in the black market?

25 posted on 08/28/2002 3:34:10 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
The sophisticated frauds,

No, it's the state perpetuating the fraud, when it onerously taxes one segment of the population for engaging in a legal activity in a supposedly "free" country.

designed to dodge the state's relatively steep tariff on cigarettes and other tobacco products, since have turned up in 17 counties and investigators fear more are out there.

"Relatively" steep? Compared to what? A 200% tax?

26 posted on 08/28/2002 3:40:19 AM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre
Welcome to the War on (Some) Drugs v2.0.

A critical clarification:


Welcome to the War on (Some) legal Drugs v2.0. v1.0.

27 posted on 08/28/2002 4:53:18 AM PDT by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
Tsk, tsk...breaking the law to get their fix. Have these people no shame?
28 posted on 08/28/2002 4:56:07 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leisler
A little History here is important for the coming election.

http://www.cato.org/dailys/8-30-96.html

29 posted on 08/28/2002 5:26:56 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
btt
30 posted on 08/28/2002 5:54:40 AM PDT by GailA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: All
The lefty Democrats are delighted at the idea of turning Americans into smugglers. The left hates our rule of law, and encouraging Americans to disrespect the law is manna from heaven for them!
31 posted on 08/28/2002 6:20:38 AM PDT by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson