Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lifestyles of the Poor and Obscure: An environmentalist laments the tragedy of electricity
The Weekly Standard ^ | 08/28/2002 | Katherine Mangu-Ward

Posted on 08/27/2002 9:10:42 PM PDT by Pokey78

THE INTRODUCTION of electricity has caused the "destruction" of cultures in the third world, according the editor of an environmental website. He says "there's a lot of quality to be had in poverty."

"I don't think a lot of electricity is a good thing. It is the fuel that powers a lot of multi-national imagery," said Gar Smith, editor of the Earth Island Institute's online journal the Edge, in an interview with's Marc Morano.

"I have to been villages in Africa that had a vibrant culture and great communities that were disrupted and destroyed by the introduction of electricity," Smith said. "People who used to spend their days and evenings in the streets playing music on their own instruments and sewing clothing for their neighbors on foot-pedal powered sewing machines" are now inside their huts watching television.

The article is studded with similar gems from Smith, but his proposed solutions to the simultaneous degradation of culture and the environment were even more interesting.

"The real question," Smith asks rhetorically, "is what personal conveniences and self-indulgences are you willing to give up in order to stop destroying the planet?"

Smith explains that "a lot" of his friends "have given up automobiles and commute by bicycles and mass transit," and that they have given up meat, since "the amount of water used to produce a pound of hamburger meat is probably enough to sustain a third world village for half a year."

Though this calculation casts some doubt on Smith's quantitative skills, like most U.S. environmentalists, he firmly believes that "the level at which Americans consume is unsustainable." He quotes a recently released World Wildlife Fund statistic: "If the rest of the world consumed at the same rate as the United States we would need three extra planets to exploit."

Smith goes on to declare that poverty is "relative." He explains that "you can't really have poverty unless you have wealthy people on the scene." One wonders why he hasn't moved to a locale more in tune with the lifestyle he and his friends embrace. There, with no health care, living on a subsistence diet, with a leaky roof over his head, at least he'd have the comfort of knowing he isn't poor.

But Smith offers comfort for avowed permanent residents of the developed world as well: "There is a solution to climate change and pollution. We saw it happen to Russia when their economy collapsed. Their industrial plants closed down, the skies got clear. Their air is a lot clearer now."

Thankfully, Smith is far from being a major player at this week's United Nations Earth Summit in Johannesburg, but some of his conclusions are the logical extensions of the mainstream environmentalism those delegates will be pushing.

Patrick Moore, a founding member of Greenpeace, left the group in the 1980s after becoming disillusioned with its radicalism and "eco-imperialist politics." He says of the delegates at the Earth Summit: "They are mainly political activists with not very much actual science background who are using the rhetoric of environmentalism to push agendas that are more political than ecological." O

f Smith, he exclaims, "What does he think--that some illiterate with her teeth falling out in the mountains is a good thing?"

Katherine Mangu-Ward is an editorial assistant at The Weekly Standard.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: feinswinesuksass electricity there were no wealthy people oppressing the poor, just like before guns there was no violence.
21 posted on 08/28/2002 12:00:45 PM PDT by meowmeow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: meowmeow
Oh, I people suck. ;^)

Did you know that close to 80% of the worlds population doesn't even wear shoes?

22 posted on 08/28/2002 12:17:22 PM PDT by Feiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: feinswinesuksass
Sometimes I watch shows on the Discovery Channel of people who live very simply in villages with no electricity and it appeals to me. They seem to have happy and stable families. Everyone works together because survival depends upon it. They work very hard and thus they are usually in great shape. They also get to hunt every day and camp out every night!

They have a life expectancy of about 40 years! If it appeals to you, please go and have the real experience.

23 posted on 08/28/2002 12:22:21 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
You must be over 40.....lighten up a little.
24 posted on 08/28/2002 2:19:49 PM PDT by Feiny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Lileks has a screed today that is apropo....
And a hoot, BTW.
25 posted on 08/28/2002 2:47:29 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson