Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US considered 'suicide jet missions'
BBC ^ | August 29, 2002 | BBC

Posted on 08/29/2002 5:33:11 PM PDT by The Energizer

Thursday, 29 August, 2002, 21:09 GMT 22:09 UK US considered 'suicide jet missions'

US Air Force commanders considered crashing fighter jets into hijacked planes on 11 September because of a lack of armed planes, a BBC investigation reveals. In the immediate aftermath of the terror attacks US fighter planes took to the skies to defend America from any further attacks.

Their mission was to protect President George W Bush and to intercept any hijacked aircraft heading to other targets in the US.

But, as a new BBC programme Clear The Skies reveals, the threat of an attack from within America had been considered so small that the entire US mainland was being defended by only 14 planes.

As a result unarmed planes were diverted from training missions in a desperate bid to increase the number of fighter planes patrolling American airspace.

Colonel Robert Marr was Commander of the North East Defence Sector and remembers the words that came over the secure phone "we will take lives in the air to preserve lives on the ground".

US military unprepared

However, at the time of the attacks the US had just four fighter pilots on alert covering the north eastern United States.

Colonel Marr: Too few planes to defend the US

US pilots were forced to take to the skies without any weapons and might have had to deliberately crash into a hijacked plane to prevent casualties on the ground.

"I had determined, of course, that with only four aircraft we cannot defend the whole north eastern United States," he said.

"Some of them would have just gotten in the air possibly without any armament onboard.

"If you had to stop an aircraft sometimes the only way to stop an aircraft is with your own aircraft if you don't have any weapons.

"It was very possible that they [the pilots] would have been asked to give their lives themselves to try to prevent further attacks if need be."

Colonel Marr said: "That was the sense of frustration, of I don't have the forces available to do anything about this, we've got everything up that we can get up and still can't do anything."

Two of the pilots patrolling north east America told the programme how they struggled to get to New York as fast as possible after the first plane had hit the World Trade Center.

Pilots "Duff" and "Nasty" recalled they were only minutes away when the second plane hit the towers.

Pilot Duff said: "For a long time I wondered what would have happened if we had been scrambled in time.

"We've been over the flight a thousand times in our minds and I don't know what we could have done to get there any quicker."


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: military; preparedness; terrorism; unitedstates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: SamAdams76
Suicide has always been considered. Look at the Strategic Air Command as it was in 1950's. It was nothing but a suicide outfit. Get to the target, drop big bomb then bail out.
41 posted on 08/29/2002 7:30:30 PM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Energizer
However, at the time of the attacks the US had just four fighter pilots on alert covering the north eastern United States.

This has to be complete and utter BS. The friggin' Brits love to toss this kind of misinformation around as if they know what they're talking about.

There would have been more than four pilots in F15s on alert at Otis AFB on the Cape alone. And I know that the Air Force has a wing stationed at or near Bradley Int'l in Connecticut.

42 posted on 08/29/2002 7:31:28 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut; Ramius; snopercod; Squantos; harpseal; redrock
The defense posture is at least daily assessed and set by the President.

Jet fighters which are unarmed, are not entirely disabled --- they do not necessarily have to ram another aircraft to bring it down.

43 posted on 08/29/2002 7:32:26 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
a decision should have been made to give priority to people descending the stairways

I think people who are in the business of saving lives would be unable to make such a decision or to live with themselves if it was made. Some people think it's better to die trying. That is the mark of a hero, I think.

44 posted on 08/29/2002 7:33:13 PM PDT by ASDFGHJK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The Energizer
Is this new news? Why is it coming out one year later?
45 posted on 08/29/2002 7:35:53 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I agree. God Bless these brave men.
46 posted on 08/29/2002 7:36:55 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: desertcry
I still think guns in the hands of pilots are better than having to shoot down a hijacked airliner.
47 posted on 08/29/2002 7:40:39 PM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
There would have been more than four pilots in F15s on alert at Otis AFB on the Cape alone. And I know that the Air Force has a wing stationed at or near Bradley Int'l in Connecticut.

Yeah, but why would it have been strange to have only four jets in the air, or ready to launch, regardless of how many squadrons we have on the East Coast.

It takes time to take a jet from stone cold to airborne. Having jets on standby wears the jets big-time, and costs like the dickens. On Sept 11th we were in a peacetime situation, with no apparent military threat. It wasn't the cold war where they had thousands of jets on the ground ready to launch in 15 minutes. The only jets up in the air would have been those training, and a handful of jets used for drug intradiction.

Even the paranoid Soviets had troubles keeping their intradiction forces ready 24-7. Remember Matthias Rust (AFAIR), who landed a 152 on Red Square after flying from W. Germany. Or how about KAL 007. It spent three-four hours over Soviet airspace with the Soviets scrambling like mad to get planes up in the air after it. They finally got two -- and only two -- in the air.

Like Toby Keith sang we "got sucker-punched from somewhere in the back."

48 posted on 08/29/2002 7:41:02 PM PDT by No Truce With Kings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: JimVT
my gut feeling on this agrees with yours ...
49 posted on 08/29/2002 7:41:34 PM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vast Buffalo Wing Conspiracy
"Towards the end of WWII, Hitler turned down proposals for suicide weapons, and he had people willing to volunteer for suicide missions. That even Hitler would not consider suicide weapons says something about Western attitudes"

You never heard of Gruppe Elbe? They were have half trained Luftwaffe pilots who rammed B-17's in the last days of the war. Scores died but few bombers were lost. Ramming was a matter of course in the Soviet Air Force. It was even being considered decades after the war.

50 posted on 08/29/2002 7:48:56 PM PDT by Eternal_Bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Energizer
This is completely false... while planes may be flying without missiles, I cannot for one minute believe only 14 planes in the country had bullets in thier guns.
51 posted on 08/29/2002 7:54:23 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Energizer
I've just read several posts on this thread insisting that the U.S. must have had more than 4 aircraft on alert prior to Sept 11. Here are some things to consider.
1. A base full of fighters is not the same as a base full of armed fighters. Before Sept 11 it was EXTREMELY rare to arm aircraft with actual ordnance. In fact, before Sept 11, in ten years of flying fighters I flew exactly 1 mission with live air to air ordnance in the U.S.. Many bases didn't even have live ordnance located on the base, nevermind loaded on the aircraft.
2. Active duty fighter squadrons did not sit alert in the U.S. immediately prior to Sept 11. The 1st Fighter Wing in VA is the primier active duty F-15 fighter wing on the East Coast, and was guarded by a couple National Guard F-16's from North Dakota.
3. Fighters sitting alert in the southern part of the U.S. were most commonly tasked to intercept suspected drug runners, and were typically flown without ordnance.
4. There really wasn't any reason to have a bunch of armed fighters sitting ready at U.S. bases prior to Sept 11. The only long range air threat ended with the demise of the Soviet Union. The notion that someone would us airliners as guided weapons wasn't realistic.
I'm not saying the BBC show isn't BS. I haven't seen it. But nothing I've read in the article refrenced here is too far off.
52 posted on 08/29/2002 8:12:46 PM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax Government
Of course, things were so screwed up in the hour they had from collision to collapse, that there probably wasn't anybody around to make that decision.

Rudy was still rushing towards the Towers when they collapsed. Nodody knew that the Towers were coming down, and if anybody had thought of it, they didn't have enough time to figure out WHEN they were coming down, much less communicate that information in an efficient manner to the people doing the evacuation.

I'm pretty sure that the first collapse took everybody in the building by complete surprise.
53 posted on 08/29/2002 8:35:23 PM PDT by Freeper 007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
There would have been more than four pilots in F15s on alert at Otis AFB on the Cape alone. And I know that the Air Force has a wing stationed at or near Bradley Int'l in Connecticut.

It seems correct that only a few birds were on Zulu alert status since the end of the cold-war and pre 9/11. There probably was only 4 F-15s(which is the standard) on alert at Otis to cover the Northern to Central coast states. I Never heard of Bradley Int in Connecticut doing 24/7 strip alert. Bradley obviously an ANG or AF Reserve station. I wonder what AFB or ANG is tasked to cover the South-East US seaboard?

54 posted on 08/29/2002 8:41:39 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob; Young Werther
Werther - I was one of those SAGE controllers in the 60's, and we all belonged to NORAD - North Ameerican Air Defense command.

Bob
I have been wondering for a number of years, prior to 911, what ever happened to NORAD, as we haven't seemed to have any US air defense for many years now.

Bob, as you are younger, and more familiar, perhaps you know.
55 posted on 08/29/2002 8:45:20 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob
If they were missiles, then more than likely, they were inert, with active seekers, but no warheads or rocket motors.

It's called a CAP-9 and the the guidance control unit is a passive seeker. You can tell an inert missile from by its blue band markings. Yellow painted bands = high explosive and the rocket moter would have brown painted bands --medium explosive.

56 posted on 08/29/2002 8:51:28 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
perhaps you can answer #55
57 posted on 08/29/2002 8:57:04 PM PDT by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: michigander
It was very possible that they [the pilots] would have been asked to give their lives themselves to try to prevent further attacks if need be

Suicide missions may not be part of the national culture but "Duty, Honor and Country" are. Many pilots have ridden their planes down to avoid hitting populated areas. In my Air Force career, I have known pilots that would do ( and have done) anything necessary to protect their buddies like intentionally drawing fire. The type of mission depicted in this article is derived from the same necessity.

Also, based on the article, the possibility of a shootdown in Pennsylvania is debunked. There were true heroes on that plane who also made the same type of decision, giving their life to save others, that the pilots would have faced.

Conspiracy theorists can save the flaming, it just ain't right to trash these heroes.

58 posted on 08/29/2002 9:14:18 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Energizer
"US pilots were forced to take to the skies without any weapons and might have had to deliberately crash into a hijacked plane to prevent casualties on the ground."

They could farm out the duty to the ChiComs. I understand they have recent hands-on experience in this area.

--Boris

59 posted on 08/29/2002 9:14:48 PM PDT by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Amongst our Medal of Honor winners you'll find many cases of self sacrifice from our culture

I agree with you except the MOH is awarded not won.

60 posted on 08/29/2002 9:16:49 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson