Skip to comments.
Clinton Questions Attacking Iraq (barf)
(AP) ^
Posted on 08/30/2002 8:59:56 PM PDT by Dallas
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
To: cajungirl
Once said early on that Clinton had no shame. Of course, now that is pretty clear to most anyone with half a brain.
That this dirtbag, after being clearly responsible for the deaths of so many people - From Mogadishu to New York - can even claim to "know" what's right on anything, but especially military and security, and that he has the gall to even utter a word, shows just how far this country has fallen.
Question: was he hawking herbal viagra from some side show at the fair?
41
posted on
08/31/2002 5:42:42 AM PDT
by
CT
To: Dallas
What a POS.....I knew on Jan 20 after watching his *farewell* at Andrews that he was not going away.
I pray for the day that we no longer have to see/hear this rapist.
To: Dallas
Clinton is a foolish,ignorant,cowardly man. How many more Americans have to die in order for the libs to understand that playing the victim won't protect us.
43
posted on
08/31/2002 7:08:41 AM PDT
by
linn37
To: Mike Darancette
Hillary just claimed in another NYS paper that she's sat in on top-secret classified briefings on Iraq. And that the info she's gotten at those briefings leads her to believe that that military action is not warranted at this time. This was in a paper yesterday. Since when does Hilliary sit in on classified briefings? And if she's not lying, why the heck is she broadcasting the info discussed in public?
44
posted on
08/31/2002 7:15:15 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Mike K
ooo...now that's a good description!
To: giznort
oh gross...he's an incessant floater!
To: Joy Angela
Actually this goes all the way back prior to Clinton when we were at war with Kuwait. The only purpose was to empower the U.N in 1991 under Bush Sr. We should have taken Saddam out. He is in violation of the U.N. treaty where he was to allow them to inspect for biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction. He is laughing at us now as he is stocking up on dirty bombs containing the smallpox virus and God knows what else.
To: Dallas
"That's a hard question to answer. And one that I think there needs to be a lot of public debate on," he said. What a hypocrite - all this hot air from a guy who ordered American troops in harms way to attack Iraq as nothing more than a diversion to his impeachment proceedings.
This "man" is a disgrace to our nation and the world.
48
posted on
08/31/2002 10:25:37 AM PDT
by
NorCoGOP
To: Dallas
Doesn’t this administration or the GOP have anyone, even a surrogate, that would just “bitch-slap” this a** hole in a public forum, preferably on some national talking-head show? If this jerk is not set back on his heals, the GOP may just as a well kiss the oval office good-bye because Bubba is laying the groundwork for Hillary’s non-candidacy. She’ll sneak in the side door to the oval office just like she did to the Senate seat in New York.
Bush has a bulls-eye painted on his forehead and everyone is beginning to take pot-shots at him and he becomes more and more vulnerable with each passing day. He is being judged. He (Bush) made a big to-do about getting OBL, which has not been the case. Granted the Taliban was routed from Afghanistan but the Al Queda is alive and well in Pakistan, Iran and Iraq and a multitude of other nations including the USA. Kicking the Taliban’s a** was equal to stomping Haiti. Not really a whole heck of a lot to write home about.
Now he is broadcasting that he is going to topple SH in Iraq. Well, that is a completely different ball game, militarily and politically, and he better start providing some definitive proof of being able to do what he says he is going to do and one of the first things would be to cut Bubba down to size. If he can’t defeat his political enemies at home, who in the hell will have confidence in him defeating political and military enemies on a global scale?
49
posted on
08/31/2002 10:41:19 AM PDT
by
varon
To: Dallas
Freepers question press coverage given to Clinton
To: Dallas
A U.S. attack on Iraq could give Saddam Hussein an excuse to use weapons of mass destruction against the United States As if Saddam thought he needed an excuse.
As if a U.S. attack on Iraq were a legitimate excuse for Iraq's use of WMD.
To: Mike Darancette
If Sadaam does have WMD, and we do nothing. Then he gets to pick the time, and the place when he'll use them.
Juxtaposed with our attacking him now, and forcing his hand. We may not like the outcome, but at least the element of suprise is taken away. At least the U.S./Israel can be somewhat prepared.
52
posted on
08/31/2002 1:04:38 PM PDT
by
Dallas
To: Dallas
What we've learned from this asshole is that the failure to deal with the other assholes on there own terms results in escalalting attacks on America and Americans.
He is, was and will always be a spineless SOB.
53
posted on
08/31/2002 1:09:31 PM PDT
by
jwalsh07
To: Dallas
is anyone REALLY suprised about this? (yawn)
To: Dallas
I could not believe what x42 said this morning on CNN. He said, "if we hit Iraq, they will use their weapons of mass destruction on us".
Oh really??
Excuse me ... aren't these the same people who said we had to wait until Sadaam GOT weapons of mass destruction before we could strike?? I think these people need to get their stories straight!!!!
This only proves what idiots they are!
55
posted on
08/31/2002 3:48:03 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: Dallas
56
posted on
08/31/2002 5:50:14 PM PDT
by
Cindy
To: Dallas
Clinton also questioned attacking Osama bin Laden when his people bombed the WTC and the USS Cole. Look at what that brought us.
To: Dallas
Is anyone else of the opinion that it is time for GWB to turn the tables on Billy-boy?
If Bush REALLY wants to engender support for attacking Iraq, he ought to tell the truth about what Clinton did --and did not do --and how it put our country in jeopardy.
Yes, people will be angry. They might be so angry they might actually want to go to war.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
