Posted on 09/05/2002 2:33:12 PM PDT by Tailgunner Joe
I don't know what you're referring to specifically, but a lot of what's objectionable is characteristic of modern American cities and not of any region. Are the goings-on in Atlanta, Phoenix or Dallas all that different from those in Seattle, Boston, or Chicago? I'd imagine many "red zone" cities have a wilder nightlife than Milwaukee, Buffalo or Philadelphia.
TV and mass marketing have made the country more uniform. Everyone who has a TV has probably been exposed to today's cultural rot, wherever they live.
And even in the Northeast, I'd imagine that the image is "Will and Grace" and the reality is "Married ... with Children." The image is of gays and swingers, but the reality is as often the kind of hardworking, religious, family people who were killed at the WTC.
It may be that urban America is decadent and depraved, but drawing borders to isolate the rot would be very difficult indeed.
Affluent yuppie strivers are the same South and West, North and East. The real dividing line isn't where they live, but when they have kids. You won't be able to keep them wholly out if you want to have a modern, functioning economy, and they bring their manners with them.
And even if you do, there's a trickle down or spill over of affluent decadence and immorality to those lower down on the social scale. America in the Forties and Fifties had been able to push drugs and promiscuity to the fringes of society. They've been creeping back up or down to the middle classes wherever you live, unless you're very lucky.
That's not to say that resistance is impossible, but secession or division looks like a bad bet to me. So long as people have leisure and affluence, you can't keep the initial commitment to virtue going, and things will start to creep back closer to what they are now.
I've seen similar things too. Bottom line is: if one treasures freedom and small government, don't let women vote.
Of course I was joking. I'd never advocate that. No, Never. Not me. No. Just kidding. Don't like those people in the white jackets.
From what I've observed, abortion seems to be the holy cause far above all others to female Dems. That is really the only thing they seem to care about.
So next time, casually ask your sisters/friend what they think of the state providing medical care to kids w/o parental consent...then work around to that being the case with the parental notification laws re: abortion. Also, the 'logic' behind these laws is supposedly that some families are so abusive the girl simply couldn't ask her parents on her own...hello, if the family is *that* abusive why is the state sending her back when it's done with the abortion? I think they know the parents would get upset...what parent would *not* get upset knowing their 13yr old had been having unprotected sex enough to actually get pregnant? Sheesh...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.