Skip to comments.
Senators Overwhelmingly Pass Pilot Gun Bill
Reuters
| 9/05/02
| Susan Cornwell
Posted on 09/05/2002 10:15:24 PM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
09/05/2002 10:15:24 PM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Way to go!
2
posted on
09/05/2002 10:17:47 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: Ciexyz
I say give the flight attendents the guns or tazers.
We dont wanna trick johnny from opening the cockpit door
3
posted on
09/05/2002 10:30:00 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: AnnaZ; HangFire
If Boxer believes that arming pilots will make the skies safer; I wonder why she doesn't think arming citizens will make the streets safer.
4
posted on
09/05/2002 10:35:07 PM PDT
by
Feiny
To: feinswinesuksass
>If Boxer believes that arming pilots will make the skies safer; I wonder why she doesn't think arming citizens will make the streets safer.
Boxer herself carries, so I presume there is another reason for disarming the law abiding citizenry.
To: kattracks
I'm surprised Boxer didn't tack on an amendment mandating plains to be equiped with an onboard abortion clinic as a prerequisite for pilots getting to carry guns.
To: GOPcapitalist
plains=planes
To: kattracks
Sen. Ernest Hollings, a South Carolina Democrat, agreed to vote for the measure after sponsors agreed to include a provision requiring cockpit doors to be secured and locked during flight. So pilots are not going to be able to use the bathroom or flirt with stewardesses during a flight?
Hollings is a complete moron.
8
posted on
09/05/2002 10:42:03 PM PDT
by
Mulder
To: Tancredo Fan; Sabertooth; sarcasm; sonofliberty2; PsyOp; holyscroller; B4Ranch; agitator; ...
PING.
Looks like those folks in Washington might have a smidgeon of common sense.
To: kattracks
"Those who want them and can use them and understand them should have the right to carry weapons," Burns said We Americans do have the Right to carry weapons.
That issue was settled at Yorktown some 200+ years ago.
The only problem is the failure of our government to recognize that Right (along with a host of others).
10
posted on
09/05/2002 10:44:07 PM PDT
by
Mulder
To: Marine Inspector
Looks like those folks in Washington might have a smidgeon of common sense. How do you justify that leap? Perhaps, you aren't aware that it is going to cost $900 million to allow pilots to carry?
11
posted on
09/05/2002 11:24:09 PM PDT
by
Nephi
To: Nephi
So, your against arming the pilots?!?!?
To: Nephi
Perhaps, you aren't aware that it is going to cost $900 million to allow pilots to carry So? 9-11 cost New York City ALONE up to 95 BILLION dollars, and that doesn't count what it is costing America as a whole.
Perhaps you haven't read that al-Qaeda was planning a SECOND wave of terrorist hijacked planes for early 2002.
I don't know where you're from, but it ain't over yet, and some pilots definitely want to have a last resort to defend themselves and their plane and passengers the next time someone blows up the door to the flight deck and comes in to cut their throats.
To: kattracks
Tangentially, one thing I will miss is the occasional cockpit visit.
Once when I was flying alone as a kid of about 14, the pilot called me up to the flight deck on a 747 and let me sit in the jump seat for a while during cruise.
Another time I was flying with my Dad to England on British Airways. He is a former Royal Air Force fighter pilot of WWII vintage and so he sent his business card up to the captain with his squadron number written on the back. Of course the captain was a former RAF man too, so we both got invited up to sit in the jump seats for an hour and watch the Great Lakes roll past as my dad and the pilots bullshitted about the old RAF days.
Those days are sadly gone.
-ccm
14
posted on
09/06/2002 2:18:03 AM PDT
by
ccmay
To: kattracks
Hope these pilots are 'armed and ready' soon. . .
15
posted on
09/06/2002 4:48:52 AM PDT
by
cricket
To: feinswinesuksass
If Boxer believes that arming pilots will make the skies safer; I wonder why she doesn't think arming citizens will make the streets safer.hmmm... logic?
16
posted on
09/06/2002 4:56:13 AM PDT
by
HangFire
To: feinswinesuksass
Boxer said she knew people were surprised at her support for the bill, since she was an advocate of gun control. "This isn't about guns in the hands of criminals. This is about a trained pilot, who volunteers, most of whom have training in the military," Boxer said.
You see, there are criminals and there are pilots. Presumably, since I am not a pilot, I am a criminal.
17
posted on
09/06/2002 5:01:51 AM PDT
by
BruceS
To: Marine Inspector
So, your against arming the pilots?!?!? No. I'm just not willing to credit them with common sense, especially when allowing pilots to carry is going to cost $900 million!
18
posted on
09/06/2002 9:18:13 AM PDT
by
Nephi
To: Nephi
them = congress/administration
19
posted on
09/06/2002 9:19:58 AM PDT
by
Nephi
To: Nephi
So, you would rather have untrained people carrying guns around?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson