Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ben-Eliezer: Israel has information that Syria is hosting Al-Qaida terrorists
The Jerusalem Post ^ | September 6, 2002 | THE JERUSALEM POST INTERNET STAFF

Posted on 09/06/2002 1:49:31 PM PDT by anotherview

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: hchutch
The thing is, Iran could decide to help their warlord in Herat out while we're dealing with Saddam.

No problem. Maybe he'll get brave enough to come out into the open. Buh-bye!

21 posted on 09/06/2002 2:35:30 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
"Question is, will the Egyptians go along with it?" Oh, no question they will. The Egyptians will not forego their billions in subsidies and U.S. tank plant just to try to save Assad's skanky behind. They cut that tie when they made a deal with Israel to get back Sinai and left Assad Sr. on his own to get back the Golan. If they fooishly tried to attack Israel they'd probably end up losing Sinai again. The Egyptians would sputter and protest but like the Saudis they'd do nothing. The great thing about the Middle East is that the duplicitous vipers in charge of the Arab countries can almost always be relied upon to act in their self interest, regardless of what they say.
22 posted on 09/06/2002 2:38:22 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
You're right. The CIA has armed Predators now, don't they?

I love it when CIA imposes "sanctions." They work so much better than those of the State Department.

:)
23 posted on 09/06/2002 2:42:09 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Iraq is the first target, but definitely not the least.
24 posted on 09/06/2002 2:51:14 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
and we are concentrating soly on Iraq because????

Because the syria funding comes from Iraq I am betting. One day it will be revealed that all of al-queda was/is funded by Iraq. That is just my opinion.

25 posted on 09/06/2002 2:53:34 PM PDT by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah; Travis McGee
>>> If we need that kind of fire support, we need to build new ships with new technology.<<<

You should have seen the vessel I saw about a month ago leaving San Diego harbor. I guessed it at 400-450' long flush flat deck with a very small house midships, no weapons showing - in fact no protrusions at all - tall freeboard and a radical prow that can only be described ad radical fast looking - large long bulb breaking the water and severely flaired topsides at the bow. It looked like the transom was fold down to let amphib or aircushon vehicles out. It was as Buck Roger-ish a boat as I have ever seen.

Its markings were something like HSTV.....High Speed Test Vessel?? Travis - do you know what she was??

26 posted on 09/06/2002 2:53:45 PM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Oops, I meant (in #24): Iraq is the first target, but definitely not the last.
27 posted on 09/06/2002 2:56:29 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HardStarboard
Yes, I know what you're talking about. The Marines are looking at it for intratheater troop transport.
28 posted on 09/06/2002 3:01:11 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
...and we are concentrating soly on Iraq because????

Because in order to go after Syria/Lebanon and Iran, we need Hussein out. Plus, we need Iraq as a staging ground. Understand now?

29 posted on 09/06/2002 3:09:37 PM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
They cut a deal with Sammy "The Bull" Gravano.

Yep, and he was convicted today for running an extacy ring and sentenced to 10 years in prison.

30 posted on 09/06/2002 3:11:04 PM PDT by SunStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
...and we are concentrating soly on Iraq because????

One answer is because of the Gulf War and Saddam's failure to live up to the terms of his surrender visa vis WMDs. Actually it seems to me we should be able to go into Iraq on the basis of the Bush doctrine, as Iraq is almost certainly harboring terrorists. Anyway, here is the "real" reason, I suspect:

Of the three main regional states sponsoring terrorism -- Iraq, Iran and Syria -- Iraq's government is the easiest to topple, and is therefore the place to start. Iraq has a narrowly supported autocracy: a single dictator with a very small constiuency sharing interest in his continued rule. This is the easiest type of government to overturn by external action, but very hard to overturn internally because the vital constituency the government depends on for support is so small and is easily controled or paid off.

Iran is the opposite, an autocratic government with (relatively) wide support among the tens of thousands of mullahs who share and benefit from the government's rule. This type of government is easier to topple internally because of the larger constituency that needs to be protected and/or paid off. Protests by prodemocracy orgs have been continuing and intensifying in Iran for a year now, so it makes good sense to wait a bit for this problem to take care of itself through revolution. Further, the liberation of Iraq is likely to provide a stimulus to the revolution in Iran, assuming it has not already occured by then.

Finally, I don't know a great deal about Syria, but the impression I have is that their military is (relatively) more professional and more loyal to the government than Saddam's is. Saddam reportedly controls his military with operatives who are personally loyal to him and who shadow the various unit commanders. IOW he can't trust the loyalty of his own officer corp. If Syria is a tougher nut to crack, it will nevertheless be easier or, alternatively, more responsive to threats or diplomatic pressure, after we have demonstrated our resolve in Iraq.

31 posted on 09/06/2002 3:14:10 PM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: anotherview
BUT BUT BUT, Clinton thinks we can only focus on Saddam. One at a time you know.
33 posted on 09/06/2002 3:31:01 PM PDT by finnman69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
I have never understood why Isreal hasn`t cleaned out the Baaka[sp] Valley in Lebanon.

Also, don`t forget that Syria sent an armored division that helped lberate Kawait in 91.

34 posted on 09/06/2002 4:25:39 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Watch what happens in Syria once we take out Saddam: they will become the epitome of democracy and justice.
35 posted on 09/06/2002 5:01:00 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Iran is very close to a full scale rebellion. <P It will be interesting to see what happens in Iran after the cleanup gets undre way in Iraq. My guess: a rebellion.
36 posted on 09/06/2002 6:18:17 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
The great thing about the Middle East is that the duplicitous vipers in charge of the Arab countries can almost always be relied upon to act in their self interest, regardless of what they say.

Add: They really have no other choice. Play or pay. Thus the monarchs there have two messages, one for their "people" and the "world", and quite another for US presidents behind closed doors. Even yesterday's sortie against Iraq was launched, in part, from Saudi Arabia!

37 posted on 09/06/2002 6:28:13 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Mixer
One day it will be revealed that all of al-queda was/is funded by Iraq. That is just my opinion.

Don't forget our "friends" in Saudi Arabia, and, sadly, al-queda's network in the USA (including Saudi-sponsored mosques).

38 posted on 09/06/2002 6:31:12 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
We have time to deal with Iran (2-3 years before it gets serious), and we ought to use it. Recommission the Iowa-class battleships so they can neutralize Iran's silkworm batteries, and allow the Marines to make an amphibious landing, for a start.

It cost over a quarter of a million dollars just to light off the boilers on the Iowa and pull away from the pier. I can think of a better platform for that dollar figure.

39 posted on 09/06/2002 6:34:21 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
BUT BUT BUT, Clinton thinks we can only focus on Saddam. One at a time you know.

That's because HE could only think about one thing at a time, and ususally that was how far away he was from George Staphanopolous' sink.

40 posted on 09/06/2002 6:34:54 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson