Bush: U.S. Has Case Against Iraq

Yahoo ^ | 9/7/02 | JENNIFER LOVEN

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Now we have a true madman who would think nothing of unleashing deadly weapons upon the world and the leftists are practicing bending over.

The enemy of my enemy is my friend.

[NormsRevenge]

BOOM!!! BOOM!!!

OUT GO THE LIGHTS!!

Let'S ROLL!!!!

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

"Yeah! Bring it all down, man!" </60's leftist rant>

[glock rocks]

deja vu?

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Why do they keep excluding Kuwait, Italy and Turkey?

You forgot to add: </rhetorical question>

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

Over my dead body, sheik. You'll get shot by a girl.

Maybe. Or a cruise missle or daisy-cutter. Or one of his own.

[NormsRevenge]

I'd like to send Wolf Blitzer and Phil Donahue to Baghdad about now!! ;-)

[glock rocks]

i concur.

[backhoe]

Thanks for looking-- if you run a web search for Yellow Rain you'll find Saddam & Iraq popping up...

[Mr. Mojo]

Once again, the liberal media slips in its "Bush is going it alone" talking point.

....The same liberal media that was so gung-ho - downright mongerish - about going to war in the Balkans, which posed absolutely NO threat to the U.S.

It's disgusting that even in times like these, when the U.S. is under direct attack from organized terrorist groups and their state sponsors (some of which have WMD, and wouldn't hesitite to use them on us), the media still chooses plays politics with thinly disguised leftist editorials.

[OldFriend]

??

[anniegetyourgun]

Here's my question. If Saddam is prepared with nukes next week, how would you suspect he would deliver them and what do you think he would target? What regions of the nation should be most concerned?

I'm trying to think ahead to the inevitable, because I suspect the Left will drag their feet and hinder this president just long enough to have many thousands of Americans killed by this maniac.

[allrightythen]

Blair said [snip] is government hoped to soon publish a dossier of evidence on the Iraqi president's efforts [snip]to develop weapons of mass destruction.[snip] Britain released a similar paper against Osama bin Laden ...

If this case is as thin (and embarrassing) as the last one, little wonder Dubya has Poodle Boy publish these things.

[allrightythen]

Here's my question. If Saddam is prepared with nukes next week, how would you suspect he would deliver them and what do you think he would target?

You could ask one of the jingoistic keyboard warriors on this board,..or you could ask Terry Ritter USMC, and recent Iraq weapons inspector. Ritter, says Saddam doesnt have WMD or the means to deliver.

[Mad_Tom_Rackham]

My point is: The Godless leftists support the Arabs and even to an extent Hussein because they are at odds with US interests. WE are the bad guys. It was OUR fault that the peace loving Arabs struck on 9-11. Saddam is a poor victim of agressive, imperialist, US governmenmt policy that is controlled by the evil corporate interests in collusion with Christians and Zionists. The reason Iraqi's are starving is not because Saddam has confiscated the wealth of the Iraqi nation, it is because of US policy. Same goes for Arafart and the Pali's. That's basically the script, wouldn't you agree?

[OldFriend]

Ohhhhh.....thanks for the clarification. I'm a little slow on the uptake. Agree completely....it's as you said, we're the enemy!

[FreedomFriend]

What's leftist about the article?

[FreedomFriend]

What would the Brits have thought in 1776 that 200 years later, we'd be forming a coalition to fight a greater threat to soveign nations?

The Bush administration has been strong in its support for measures that destroy American sovereignty. "Free Trade" and wide-open borders are threats to our sovereignty.

[OReilly]

....The same liberal media that was so gung-ho - downright mongerish - about going to war in the Balkans, which posed absolutely NO threat to the U.S.

Wasn't this the war that Clinton told us and the other side that he would not use ground troops. All the better to keep the media and the followers on his side.

[FreedomFriend]

WoW. They're supporting the UN, and claiming this is an international conflict that needs the help of the UN? Why is our administration giving credibility to the United Nations?