Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Average American Lifestyle Called "Total Bull---t" by Environmentalist
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 9/09/02 | Marc Morano

Posted on 09/09/2002 4:03:23 AM PDT by kattracks

Johannesburg (CNSNews.com) - One of participants at the "People's Earth Summit," a parallel (protest) event to last week's United Nation's-sponsored Earth summit, said, "If anyone in a developing country looks to the U.S. and wants a lifestyle like the average American--it's total bull---t!"

Paula Snyder, an American who is traveling around the developing world to promote various Green causes, told CNSNews.com , "Greed is the enemy - the underlying problem is greed, and that leads into most of the problems with the ecological system and the political system."

The People's Earth Summit was held at St. Stithians College near the U.N.'s main summit site in Johannesburg.

"We're going to need 16 more planets if everyone aspires to be like an average American," Snyder added.

'Social change project'


Snyder is traveling throughout the developing world as part of her "social change project," sponsored in part by the Earth Island Institute and Patch Adams, the famed doctor, known for his social activism and irreverent style.

Snyder said she has learned through her travels that residents of the world's poorer nations only think they want to emulate America.

"They want what we have -- but they don't realize how ugly it is," Snyder said.

Snyder implored her fellow Americans to "stop using so much...stop driving everywhere or carpool, stop wearing clothes that have brand names on them, stop using paper napkins for everything, stop using paper cups, carry your own travel mug, read Julia 'Butterfly' Hill's book, One Makes a Difference . It's the little things that really do make change." Hill is the young woman who lived in a California redwood tree for two years to protest logging practices.

"I wish I could make a total redistribution [of wealth]," Snyder said. "Things are going to change. They have to," she added.

"A lot to learn"


Katie Silberman told CNSNews.com , "I think the developing world has a lot of lessons for us as Americans in terms of limiting our consumption and reducing our waste."

Silberman is from the Oakland-based Center for Environmental Health, the group that led the heckling of Secretary of State Colin Powell during his address last week at the Earth Summit. (see story: American Environmentalist: 'I'm Ashamed For My Country')

"The American way of life at this point is so overblown in terms of materialism and consumption," Silberman explained. "We actually have a lot to learn from the Southern Hemisphere in terms of community health," she added.

Silberman cautioned against too much growth in the developing world. "We live on this one small planet and it only has a certain carrying capacity," she said.b?

'The natural way'

Eleven-year-old Akshit Batra, an Indian representative of the "Children's Earth Summit," said "greed of the people" is destroying the earth.

"People are very corrupt, they are not worried about the environment, they are not worried about the next generation," Batra said.

He said U.S. citizens "should try to change their lifestyle according to the natural way and farmers should decrease the use of pesticides."

'Ecological debt'


Richard Navarro, the chairman of Friends of the Earth International (FoEi) spoke at a People's Earth Summit conferences entitled, "Earth Democracy: Your Earth Rights."

FoEi played a prominent role in the main summit, and Navarro was sharply critical of the summit's final outcome. He said the world gathering was "hijacked by free market ideology, by a backward-looking, insular and ignorant U.S...."

Navarro's speech to the "People's Earth Summit" focused on the "ecological debt" owed by the industrialized "North to the [developing] South" for the North's pollution and consumption habits.

"How can a person on this planet have more right than others to consume more?" asked Navarro.

According to Navarro, men also owe the women a "debt" for gender bias, and he spoke of the debt that a "white person has with colored persons and indigenous peoples" because of racial discrimination.

In fact, all of mankind has "a debt from our species to the rest of nature," according to Navarro.

"Other species take from nature only what they need to survive," he stated. "Which other species has the capacity to destroy the earth?" Navarro asked.

Navarro said that the September 11th terrorist attacks on the U.S. were a tragic criminal act, but he noted, "That very same day, there were 7,000 people dying of diseases related to water [sanitation]. Isn't that also a crime?"

'New equality'


Herbert Girardet, chairman of the British-based Schumacher Society, said he was unhappy with the main Earth Summit because it was reduced to the "lowest common denominator - in other words, what the Americans think is okay."

Girardet said the agenda of the People's Summit was not to look at "what is possible, but what is necessary."

"The Earth is in such a profound sense of emergency" and "we must create a new equality between human life and the natural world," explained Giradet.

People at the People's Earth Summit waved posters reading, "Earth Spirituality"; "Free Trade Means Famine"; and an anti-genetically-modified-food poster reading, "Seed to Bread, Farmer to Farmer."

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: callousliberals; environazis; environmentalism; leftists; poverty; povertylobby; wssd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Cincinatus
"I wish I could make a total redistribution [of wealth]," Snyder said.

Dang! All my wealth has gone into guns. Of course she can come around and collect them. :)

41 posted on 09/09/2002 5:49:50 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I wish I could make a total redistribution [of wealth]," Snyder said.

Come get it.


42 posted on 09/09/2002 5:57:12 AM PDT by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus
I wish I could too.....I could take everything these enviro-wackos have, so I could live in opulence, while they live in squalor. According to their comments and desires (as well as my own), that appears to be a total win-win situation all around.
43 posted on 09/09/2002 5:59:31 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I wish I could make a total redistribution [of wealth]," Snyder said. "Things are going to change. They have to," she added.

Proof positive these people have never worked a day in their life, have been spoiled rotten to the point of a bona-fide neurosis, not to mention brainwashed at taxpayer expense via our public educational system.

Things are going to change, but not the way you think, the time for your nonsense has passed and gone away, thankfully.

44 posted on 09/09/2002 6:07:39 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Reading this has changed my life. After I quit my job and burn all of my belongings, I shall weave a set of hemp clothing and wander to South America where the living is good. Hrmm, those villages that cow Sally Struthers is always wallowing through look pretty enlightened, and the combination sewer/well of the muddy trench is pretty efficient.

Spotted owls taste just like chicken.
45 posted on 09/09/2002 6:11:41 AM PDT by Neckbone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Brand names verboten?

She probably means that our clothing should be manufactured by noble Arizona native-Americans on primitive looms, and by northeastern liberal ladies on spinning wheels.

All clothing should be biodegradable and recyclable. Washing instruction labels would be blank so that soap won't pollute the waterways when the outfits turn into old crusties.

In fact, the ideal clothing for these whackos would be a couple of strategically-placed fig leafs so that we can all get back to the natural conditions of the Garden of Eden.

Leni

46 posted on 09/09/2002 6:11:45 AM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Considering the new age enlightenment of these people, don't you mean the natural conditions of the great Earth-Mother Gaia when she was first born??
47 posted on 09/09/2002 6:17:26 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl
"I'm just trying to figure out what this one has against brand-name clothing"

It's called sew your own or better yet just cut 3 holes in a potato sack.

Other than that, we have a real problem until the public schools are put out of business. All these whackos are a direct product of them and we have millions of them that we have to deal with. The schools have made them incapable of reason and individual decision and they are quickly becoming a majority.
48 posted on 09/09/2002 6:18:08 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Snyder said she has learned through her travels that residents of the world's poorer nations only think they want to emulate America.

Mostly I think they'd settle for clean water and enough to eat, at least for starters.

49 posted on 09/09/2002 6:26:50 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
she claims the problem of the West is "greed."

Just shows how ignorant these people are.
What they see as "greed" is the basic human nature to try to advance ourselves and increase our standard of living. "Greed" alone does not accomplish this - hard work, and the exceeding efficiency generated by a free capitalist society are what increases the standard of living for everyone.

Capitalism may use the "most" resources, but it also is the engine for the most efficient use of resources.

I need further statistics on this, but -
that old saw about "America is 5% of the world's population and uses 25% of the resources" or some such. The rest of the statistic is never quoted. America produces over 30? (need this number) percent of the world's gross output of goods and services. This points to the overwhelming efficiency of the free capitalistic system that is the engine of liberty and standard of living.

I need numbers for other countries - how much of the world's resources do they use to produce what reduced amount of the world's output?

50 posted on 09/09/2002 6:31:56 AM PDT by MrB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: WindMinstrel
I actually enjoyed this earth summit. They really let the mask slip and admitted that it's about redistribution of wealth, not the environment. Since the Soviet Union fell the commies needed some place to escape to, and they chose the environmental movement.

But it's different. The old Soviet-style commies at least claimed their way served human needs better. They also liked industrial production, though they were none too good at it.

With the enviros, human needs are off the agenda.

51 posted on 09/09/2002 6:34:10 AM PDT by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Salman
That's true -- if these neocommunists had their druthers we'd be scratching at the dirt with sticks (if we were allowed to live, of course). Excellent point
52 posted on 09/09/2002 6:35:54 AM PDT by WindMinstrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze
LOVE your screen name!
53 posted on 09/09/2002 6:42:05 AM PDT by technochick99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Caesar Soze
You have a lot farther to go than you think. Keep striving though, because the bar is always being raised. :>()
54 posted on 09/09/2002 6:42:23 AM PDT by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This writer is a true nut-case.
55 posted on 09/09/2002 6:48:47 AM PDT by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Paula, you are hereby sentenced to read this book 100 times or until committed to memory:

Marxism is NOT good Paula. Not good.

56 posted on 09/09/2002 6:58:43 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cincinnati65
Not wearing clothes with brand names means instead wearing Patagonia, Teva, Columbia, North Face, Marmot, Western Mountaineering, Stonewear Designs, riding a Santa Cruz or Litespeed and wearing any hiking gear that can be bought at Galyan's, although any outfitter store in Ann Arbor would be, like, better. Like the Bivouac, where they have outstanding sales. And camera gear, don't get me started.

After all, the best back packs are made for hiking and you can find the best colors.

It's been my experience people like these wear MORE brand name stuff than ANYONE I have ever seen. They create their frigging lifestyle around it.

57 posted on 09/09/2002 6:59:36 AM PDT by Benrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: Benrand
No kidding! They are more brand conscious than just about any other group that comes to mind!
59 posted on 09/09/2002 7:12:10 AM PDT by missycocopuffs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: KS Flyover
What Katie needs is a nice bag of oats.
60 posted on 09/09/2002 7:25:23 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson