Posted on 09/13/2002 9:43:07 AM PDT by truthandlife
A new edition of the popular New Revised Standard Version (NRSV) commentary, The New Oxford Annotated Bible, reinterprets key sections of the Bible to negate or water down orthodox Christian beliefs about homosexuality, Jesus Christ’s sovereignty, and the sanctity of life.
The new Annotated Bible — edited in part by pro-"gay" and feminist scholars — adopts "gay" revisionist interpretations of Holy Scripture such as that God allegedly destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for the sin of inhospitality — not homosexual sin.
The nation’s leading church for homosexuals swiftly hailed the new politically correct Bible commentary. Rev. Troy D. Perry, founder of the homosexual Metropolitan Community Churches (MCC), wrote on the church’s Web site:
I’m excited to share with you today one of the most important theological breakthroughs in the 33-year history of Metropolitan Community Churches .. the world renowned biblical scholars who prepared The New Oxford Annotated Bible have adopted a great deal of MCC’s own scholarship and theology: There is no biblical condemnation of homosexuality — only prohibitions against its misuse, just as there is no biblical blanket condemnation of heterosexuality, only prohibitions against misuse of that gift.
I am pleased to commend this new study version of the Holy Scriptures. I believe it will be an important addition to the library of every MCC leader — and will be used by God to further open the doors of all faith communities to love, embrace and affirm God’s GLBT children.
Over the last several decades, the New Oxford Annotated Bible has gained wide acceptance in the large denominational churches as a valuable resource in Biblical interpretation. The Third Edition is a replacement for the Second Edition, which was published in 1991.
A comparison of selected commentaries between the two editions readily explains why homosexuals and their liberal allies are overjoyed.
SODOM SIN NOW ‘INHOSPITALITY’ For the last 3,500 years, the sin of Sodom was thought to be the widespread practice of homosexuality by the men of the city. The new Third Edition says differently:
Genesis 19:5-8: "…and they called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, so that we may know them." Lot went out of the door to the men, shut the door after him, and said, "I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly."
Second Edition: The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah impressed itself deeply upon later generations as an example of God’s total judgment upon appalling wickedness … the episode is told to illustrate the sexual excesses of Canaanites. 5. Know refers to sexual relations, here homosexual ("sodomy"). 8: Once guests had eaten in his house, Lot felt he had to obey the law of oriental hospitality, which guaranteed protection. Thus his proposal to hand over his daughters showed his determination to put first his obligation as a host.
Third Edition: The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was a prominent example in Israelite tradition of God’s total judgment. As in the case of 18:1-8, the main issue here is hospitality to secretly divine visitors. Here, however, the sanctity of hospitality is threatened by the men of the city who wish to rape (know) the guests. Though disapproval of male homosexuality is assumed here, the primary point of this text is how this threat by the townspeople violates the value of hospitality…As a result of his protection of his guests, he (Lot), like Noah, "finds favor" with God and he and his household are rescued out of destruction.
The new Oxford commentary ignores the fact that God had already decided to destroy the city because of the outcry over their grievous sins (see Genesis 18:20 and 19:13). The mission of the two angels who came to Lot’s door was to carry out God’s judgement.
Other key texts on homosexuality were similarly reinterpreted.
Romans 1:26-28: "For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions. Their women exchanged natural intercourse for unnatural, and in the same way also the men, giving up natural intercourse with women, were consumed with passion for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the due penalty for their error. And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind and to things that should not be done."
Second Edition: God gave them up, because in turning from God they violated their true nature, becoming involved in terrible and destructive perversions; God let the process of death work itself out.
Third Edition: While Torah forbids a male "lying with a male as with a woman," Paul’s Jewish contemporaries criticized a range of sexual behaviors common in the pagan world. Although widely read today as a reference to homosexuality, the language of unnatural intercourse was more often used in Paul’s day to denote not the orientation of sexual desire, but its immoderate indulgence, which was believed to weaken the body.
I Corinthians 6:9-11: "Do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived! Fornicators, idolaters, adulterers, male prostitutes, sodomites, thieves, the greedy, drunkards, revilers, robbers--none of these will inherit the kingdom of God. And this is what some of you used to be. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Spirit of our God."
Second Edition: Male prostitutes, young men or boys in a pederastic relationship; sodomites, the older homosexual.
Third Edition: The Greek term translated male prostitutes and sodomites do not refer to "homosexuals," as in inappropriate older translations; "masturbators" and male prostitutes might be a better translation.
THIRD EDITION AMBIGUOUS ON CHRIST’S SOVEREIGNTY, DIVINITY Most perniciously, the New Oxford Annotated Bible’s Third Edition commentary leaves questions regarding the sovereignty and divinity of Christ:
John 14:6 –7: "Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. If you know me, you will know my Father also. From now on you do know him and have seen him.’
Second Edition: Access to God is solely through Jesus.
Third Edition: Jesus is the gateway to God.
Note that the Third Edition removed the explicit declaration that Jesus is the only way to God.
Philippians 2:5-7: "Let the same mind be in you that was in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness."
Second Edition: In the form of God, that is, pre-existent and divine. Something to be exploited and never relinquished. But emptied himself, the extreme limit of self-denial.
Third Edition: In the form of God, equality with God, may refer to divine status, or simply preexistence as a heavenly being, or Adam’s original immortality, which Christ renounced by becoming subject to death. But emptied himself, the extreme limit of self-denial.
The Third Edition commentary removes the declarative statement of Jesus’ divinity and introduces several other interpretations that leave his deity an open question.
SANCTITY OF LIFE PASSAGE DISREGARDED Psalm 139:13-16: "For it was you who formed my inward parts; you knit me together in my mother’s womb. I praise you, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made. Wonderful are your works; that I know very well. My frame was not hidden from you, when I was being made in secret, intricately woven in the depths of the earth. Your eyes beheld my unformed substance. In your book were written all the days that were formed for me, when none of them as yet existed."
Second Edition: God formed the embryo in the womb (poetically called the depths of the earth) and knew the psalmist’s character from the moment of conception.
Third Edition: The mysterious process of creation.
The drastic changes in the Third Edition commentaries may have been influenced by new editors. The Second Edition was edited by Bruce Metzger and Roland Murphy. The Third Edition replaced Mr. Murphy with editors Michael D. Coogan, Marc Z. Brettler, and Carol A. Newsom. Dr. Newsom, in particular, is a feminist theologian who partnered with Dr. Sharon H. Ringe to produce The Womens’ Bible Commentary—a feminist perspective of scripture. Dr. Ringe serves as a Biblical consultant to the Reconciling Congregation Program of the United Methodist Church — an outreach to gay, lesbian, bi-sexual, and transgender Methodists.
Frankly, I wish the homosexual community would live their lives in peace, and allow us to do the same. If it weren't for their constant drum beat, I wouldn't be forced to evaluate their activites constantly. I'd rather leave it to God.
Humanity nears Judgement day. No matter what they call it it isnt' going to be pretty for many.
Well in that case there are a bunch of Yankees who're in big trouble...
The depraved deviants wanted to bugger the guests. That is a bit more specific than being inhospitable.
That anyone would even bother with this effort to distort and redefine, shows the fallacy in the purely verbal argument. The best defense to the Leftists who seek to revise our perceptions of reality by changing nomenclature and making devious verbal arguments, is to keep vivid pictures of reality in one's mind. When the Bible speaks about certain acts, it is referring to certain concrete and disgusting acts, not a philosophic abstraction.
I feel truly sorry for people who are afflicted with sexual dysfunction. I would not hurt such people. But it is absolutely intolerable, when advocates for such people, seek to deny reality, in order to pursue the looniest of all the looney versions of the myth of human equality--that which seeks to equate the perverse with the normal.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
I didn't know that you could go to hell for bad manners. Now I know why my mother was so adamant about not having your elbows on the dinner table.
Amen.
This has all become ludicrous and an annoyance to the intellect and the soul.
One lump or two, Bill?
This would be hilarious if it weren't so blasphemous.
Ezekiel 16: 49-50 - "This was the guilt of your sister Sodom: she and her daughters had pride, excess of food, and prosperous ease, but did not aid the poor and
needy. They were haughty and did abominable things before me; therefore I removed it when I saw it."
What abominable things?
Ge:19:1: And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
Ge:19:2: And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night.
Ge:19:3: And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.
Ge:19:4: But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:
Ge:19:5: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.
Ge:19:6: And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,
Ge:19:7: And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
Ge:19:8: Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
Ge:19:9: And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
Ge:19:10: But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
Ge:19:11: And they smote the men that were at the door of the house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied themselves to find the door.
Ge:19:12: And the men said unto Lot, Hast thou here any besides? son in law, and thy sons, and thy daughters, and whatsoever thou hast in the city, bring them out of this place:
Ge:19:13: For we will destroy this place, because the cry of them is waxen great before the face of the LORD; and the LORD hath sent us to destroy it.
Ge:19:14: And Lot went out, and spake unto his sons in law, which married his daughters, and said, Up, get you out of this place; for the LORD will destroy this city. But he seemed as one that mocked unto his sons in law.
Ge:19:15: And when the morning arose, then the angels hastened Lot, saying, Arise, take thy wife, and thy two daughters, which are here; lest thou be consumed in the iniquity of the city.
There is no doubt whatsoever the meaning of these words. Is homosexuality the only sin? Evidently Ezekiel didn't believe it was. But the omissions are not abominable actions. They might be abominable inactions, but they couldn't be abominable actions. And the attempt to have relations with these angels were clearly abominable actions. Therefore your attempt to whitewash the story of Lot (Sodom and Gomorra) is woefully inadequate and misguided.
Just to show how far off base you are, where in the story of Sodom and Gomorra does it relate that the poor were removed before their destruction? Furthermore, in Genesis it states, "But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:" "All the people of every quarter..." Another words, ever facet of society participated in this. That includes the poor and the hungry.
Get over it.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/749443/posts
. . . AND implications thereof.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/religion/749443/posts
which seems to articulate a similar attitude on God's part.
That's not the same thing as saying He wasn't annoyed with their other perversities at all. It merely speaks to the root of them.
There's your proof.
Did God destroy the poor and needy when he destroyed Sodom and Gormorrah? The story doesn't say one way or the other. Maybe he did.
If there were any poor and needy in Sodom or Gomorrah, they were undoubtedly wicked as well. Abraham asked God to spare Sodom and Gomorrah if there were but 10 righteous there. There weren't. The only ones spared were Lot's family, which numbered 4. Easy math.
Were innocent people not destroyed in the great flood?
The biblical account gives us no indication whatsoever that there were any just people other than Noah and his family on earth at the time. Gen 6 says that every imagination of man's heart was evil continually. Only Noah found grace in God's sight.
I suspct they will next hijack "Cake Soaker" . . . or "Cork Socker" . . . maybe even "Coke Sacker"!!! ;-))
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.