Skip to comments.
HERE COME THE FAT POLICE
Fiedor Report On the News #287 ^
| 9-15-02
| Doug Fiedor
Posted on 09/14/2002 9:39:44 AM PDT by forest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
To: Eala
Thanks for reposting that; because I've never read it.
The more things change, the more they stay the same, huh?
To: forest
Even the liberal concerns, like Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, are targets.
To: forest; Gabz; SheLion; Madame Dufarge
43
posted on
09/15/2002 1:39:31 PM PDT
by
metesky
To: forest
You know, a long time ago I read a post on FR stating that lawyers would be suing for fat people next. I didn't comment, I considered that an absolute heavy tin-foil post. Boy, was I wrong.
44
posted on
09/15/2002 1:44:41 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: Smokin' Joe
the BMI is just the old chart in a formula. I'm 6 feet tall, weigh 228, and can pick up an engine block (stripped, no main caps) and put it on the stand (8 cylinder, not a 4-banger). The last time I weighed in at 180 lbs, I had been underfed (grad school) for eight months and spent one week of that time with no food at all. Muscle weighs more than fat.The article saying that a 6' tall man is considered obese at 200 lbs. caught my attention, too. My husband is 6', 200 lbs. (though maybe down to 195 now) and he is definitely not obese. When he weighed 170 lbs. a few years ago, he looked too thin. Now, he's built thicker, but with weightlifting, running, etc. he's still in good shape. Those weight charts are ridiculous sometimes.
To: forest
Even the liberal concerns, like Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream, are targets. Ben & Jerry's!? Those dioxin purveyors?
("The study shows that the level of dioxin in a sample serving of one variety of Ben & Jerry's brand ice cream is about 2,200 times greater than the level of dioxin allowed in wastewater discharged into San Francisco Bay from the Tosco oil refinery." study)
46
posted on
09/15/2002 2:45:01 PM PDT
by
Eala
To: xJones
You know, a long time ago I read a post on FR stating that lawyers would be suing for fat people next. I didn't comment, I considered that an absolute heavy tin-foil post. Boy, was I wrong.Good thing we are not gloaters...... we're not going to say, "We told you so." :-}
To: Great Dane
Good thing we are not gloaters...... we're not going to say, "We told you so." :-}Well, don't try and sue me, I never said anything! :)
48
posted on
09/15/2002 6:04:54 PM PDT
by
xJones
To: Great Dane
You know, when a doctor can explain why a vegan gets cancer, a man goes into the hospital for an operation and has the wrong body part removed, when a perfectly healthy fetus is sucked down a drain and why it's estimated that doctors kill 98,000 patients per year due to negligence and/or ineptitude....then I'll decide to listen to his preaching on smoking.
Why is it they call their job a "practice"? If you're still "practicing", you're not worth $75 for 10 minutes of your office time.
To: xJones
True. No one believed it then. You'll never believe what's next.
To: xJones
#48...... How could anyone possibly know all levels of governments would become so dependent on sin taxes.
To: Thumper1960
#49......... Mind if I borrow this, it will be my next reply to my good doctor. ??
To: Smokin' Joe
BTW, the BMI is just the old chart in a formula. I'm 6 feet tall, weigh 228, and can pick up an engine block (stripped, no main caps) and put it on the stand (8 cylinder, not a 4-banger). The last time I weighed in at 180 lbs, I had been underfed (grad school) for eight months and spent one week of that time with no food at all. Muscle weighs more than fat. The index should be a factor of total body fat as a percentage, not just body weight.I'm glad you mentioned this. What's also important is that they changed the rules a couple of years ago. What used to be acceptable BMI is now marginal or even "obese". My BMI is borderline obese under the new rules as well, despite my having a slightly better than average body-fat %. I'm not Arnold but I stay in shape.
53
posted on
09/15/2002 6:28:24 PM PDT
by
meyer
To: Uncle Meat
,,, first they sue the tobacco companies for giving them lung cancer; then the fast food places for making them fat; guess I can sue Budweiser for all the ugly women I've slept with.
To: shaggy eel
But you can thank Budweiser for giving you the courage to do it.
To: Great Dane
Be my guest!
To: SheLion
Bubba says "Just let him say something to me. I'm ready."I agree with Bubba.
My doctor always asks me if I've quit, I always reply that I'll quit when she can guarantee that I'll live to be 118 if I do.
That ends the converation.
To: Uncle Meat
And for inebriating the women as well!
To: j271
Yet the lawyers wouldn't do it if there wasn't money to be made. Is tort reform the answer, or are there broader issues that cannot be addressed through mere legislation? Eliminate punative damages. If its bad enough to be punished, then pass a law through the legislative process. Judicial legislation for the enrichment of lawyers must be stopped. Its destroying the very freedoms that make this country great.
59
posted on
09/16/2002 12:56:20 AM PDT
by
meyer
To: Eala
"In between come all the hundreds of little steps, some of them imperceptible, each of them preparing you not to be shocked by the next. Step C is not so much worse than Step B, and, if you did not make a stand at Step B, why should you at Step C? And so on to Step D." "And one day, too late, your principles, if you were ever sensible of them, all rush in upon you."
For want of a nail, a shoe was lost...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson