Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Three Minute Discrepancy in Flight 93 Tape
Philadelphia Daily News ^ | Sept. 16, 2002 | William Bunch

Posted on 09/16/2002 5:34:36 AM PDT by ConservativeNewsJunkie

THE FINAL three minutes of hijacked United Flight 93 are still a mystery more than a year after it crashed in western Pennsylvania - even to grieving relatives who sought comfort in listening to its cockpit tapes in April.

A Daily News investigation has found a roughly three-minute gap between the time the tape goes silent - according to government-prepared transcripts - and the time that top scientists have pinpointed for the crash.

Several leading seismologists agree that Flight 93 crashed last Sept. 11 at 10:06:05 a.m., give or take a couple of seconds. Family members allowed to hear the cockpit voice recorder in Princeton, N.J., last spring were told it stopped just after 10:03.

The FBI and other agencies refused repeated requests to explain the discrepancy.

The cockpit voice recorder a roughly 30-minute tape loop, is supposed to record the sounds inside the cockpit right up until the moment of impact and usually does.

Aviation experts said there could be several explanations for the gap.

They said it could mean that the FBI and other government agencies either failed to properly synchronize the times, or there were other problems in the retrieving or handling of the tape from the so-called "black box" recovered from the wreckage at Shanksville, Pa.

Or, experts speculated, it could mean there was a major on-board electrical failure on the plane three minutes before Flight 93 crashed, causing the recorder to quit working.

What's not told

The broader significance is that the three-minute gap points to how little is really known about how and why Flight 93 crashed - even as the saga of the doomed jetliner and cell-phone calls from some of the 40 passengers and crew continue to captivate the nation.

"That's part of the whole war aspect - we don't want to tell about what we did and didn't do," said Vernon Grose, a former National Transportation Safety Board member who says he still has questions about the Flight 93 crash. He said he doubts there will ever be "a nice, open public hearing with eyewitnesses telling what they saw."

However, in recent weeks, two books about Flight 93 have topped the best-seller lists, while President Bush and other top government officials continue to invoke the story - based largely on the cell-phone calls - of fighting between the passengers and the hijackers as a "Let's roll" rallying cry to continue the war against global terrorism.

But the FBI has clamped a tight lid of secrecy on the flight data recorder - which could best show how Flight 93 actually crashed - and on the cockpit voice recorder.

"We have no comment at all on the tape issue," said Sam Dibbley, spokeswoman for the U.S. Attorney's office in northern Virginia that presented the tape to families.

An FBI spokesman, Steven Berry, said the bureau continues to officially list the time of the Flight 93 crash as 10:03 a.m. The NTSB referred all questions to the FBI.

But the relatives of Flight 93 passengers who heard the cockpit tape April 18 at a Princeton hotel said government officials laid out a timetable for the crash in a briefing and in a transcript that accompanied the recording. Relatives later reported they heard sounds of an on-board struggle beginning at 9:58 a.m., but there was a final "rushing sound" at 10:03, and the tape fell silent.

What can be heard

"There is no sound of the impact," said Kenneth Nacke, whose brother, Lou Nacke Jr., is one of the passengers believed to have fought with the hijackers. Nacke confirmed that the government said the tape ended at 10:03 a.m.

He added: "The quality of the sound is really poor."

Vaughn Hoglan, the uncle of passenger Mark Bingham, said by phone from California that near the end there are shouts of "pull up, pull up," but the end of the tape "is inferred - there's no impact."

New York Times reporter Jere Longman, who spoke with relatives of all but one of the 40 Flight 93 victims, writes in the epilogue to bestseller "Among the Heroes" that "at about three minutes after ten, the tape went silent."

Lisa Beamer, the wife of passenger Todd Beamer, who heard the tape while working on her No. 1 best-seller "Let's Roll," also gives 10:03 as the end of the flight.

Seismologists - experts in the earth's vibrations - have almost exactly pinpointed the time of the crash of Flight 93 at 10:06:05.

"The seismic signals are consistent with impact at 10:06:05," plus or minus two seconds, said Terry Wallace, who heads the Southern Arizona Seismic Observatory and is considered the leading expert on the seismology of man-made events. "I don't know where the 10:03 time comes from."

Likewise, a written study commissioned by the Department of Defense - carried out by seismologists from Columbia University and the Maryland Geological Survey - also determined impact was at 10:06:05.

Normally, such a large discrepancy might be cleared up when the National Transportation Safety Board releases a written transcript of the voice recorder - edited for sounds of suffering or profanity - right before holding public hearings on an air disaster. But because the Flight 93 crash was part of a criminal act, no NTSB hearings are expected.

The Justice Department has also insisted that the cockpit tape can't be released because it will be played to the jury at the trial of admitted al Qaeda terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui, now set for January.

Although Moussaoui is often referred to in the media as "the 20th hijacker," there's been no evidence that he was slated to be on board Flight 93 or the three other planes hijacked on Sept. 11. Moussaoui's court-appointed lawyers sought last week to block the use of the recording.

What could've happened

Last fall, as the saga of the Flight 93 passenger uprising became widely known, several relatives of the crash victims made an unusual request: They wanted to hear the actual tape. The FBI initially issued a cold refusal.

"While we empathize with the grieving families, we do not believe that the horror captured on the cockpit voice recording will console them in any way," FBI Assistant Director John Collingwood said last December. But under continuing pressure, the bureau changed its mind and agreed to the unusual April gathering at a Princeton Marriott hotel.

None of the family members interviewed for this story recalls any explanation of a discrepancy between the times on the tape recording and the actual crash at 10:06.

They were, according to the relatives and published accounts, given a talk by one of Moussaoui's prosecutors, who speculated that the passengers may have used a food cart to break into the cockpit.

But with government officials refusing to be interviewed, leading aviation experts interviewed for this story could only speculate about the tape discrepancy.

Possibilities they suggested:

• The FBI could have bungled this part of the investigation by failing to synchronize the time stamp of clocks onboard Flight 93 - which could have been set wrong - with air traffic control tapes and other tones that make it possible to determine the exact, correct times. Such a mistake would mean that the tape really did run until the impact, but that all the times given to the relatives on the transcript were off by three minutes.

Investigators typically nail down the correct times very early in a probe, experts said. Todd Curtis, who runs the Web site AirSafe.com, said the three-minute gap "does not make sense."

"From what I have heard about the flight's CVR [cockpit voice recorder], there was at least one transmission from the cockpit to air traffic control that would have been captured by the ATC tapes," Curtis said. "Those tapes should also have some kind of time reference."

• At 10:03, the hijackers - or possibly passengers and crew who were fighting to regain control of the plane - flipped a circuit breaker or switch that cut off power to the cockpit voice recorder.

Experts said this would explain why the tape ends abruptly, but they had no idea why the terrorists would do such a thing, especially so far along into their hijacking. And they noted that the location of cockpit circuit breakers makes it unlikely it was struck accidentally during a struggle.

"That would be a much tougher task than turning off the transponder," said R. John Hansman, an aviation professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "You would have to know exactly which circuit breaker to pull."

• There was a major on-board electrical failure before the crash - although it's not clear what could have triggered this. It has happened before. On Swissair Flight 111, which crashed off the coast of Nova Scotia in September 1998, the cockpit fire that caused the crash also killed power to the plane's two black boxes six full minutes before the crash.

New evidence that came out last week may support the electrical-failure theory. A federal air traffic controller from Cleveland, Stacey Taylor, told "Dateline NBC" that Flight 93's transponder, initially shut off by the hijackers, came back on briefly only to give out - at 10:03 a.m.

• There was some unknown problem either in retrieving the cockpit tape from the black box, or in its handling by government officials and contractors since last September, or in the presentation that was given in Princeton.

No one has stepped forward with any evidence of that.

But the three-minute gap is certain to fuel ongoing debates on the Internet over how Flight 93 really crashed, and whether the plane could have been shot down by military jet fighters that were sent aloft as the Sept. 11 hijackings unfolded. The government insists there was no shootdown.

Numerous witnesses in the Shanksville area have told the Daily News and other publications since last September that a mysterious, low-flying unmarked white jet, military in nature, circled the area at the time of the crash. The FBI has claimed this was a business jet that had been asked by air-traffic controllers to inspect the Flight 93 crater.

The debate has also been driven by the wide debris field from Flight 93 - including papers found eight miles away - and by conflicting accounts over whether a 911 caller reported an explosion and white smoke on board.

Grose, the former NTSB member, said he doubts the entire story of Flight 93 will ever be told.

"I don't think so," he said. "It's like David Crockett at the Alamo. We need heroes."

(Excerpt) Read more at philly.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fbi; flight93
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-147 next last

1 posted on 09/16/2002 5:34:37 AM PDT by ConservativeNewsJunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
There is another, more likely reason the tape MAY be missing the few moments of the flight.

As a trained and experienced aircraft mishap investigator I have listened to many tapes and let me tell you, sometimes the last few moments before a crash are heart-rendering and terrible to listen to as the aircrew fight to stay alive.

In this case, I suspect IF there is anything "missing" it would be to save the familes the pain of listening to a life and death struggle, with the confusion and fear associated with knowing they are about to die as they fight for control of the aircraft and see the ground coming at them--it would serve no purpose to play this part of the tape for the familes. Especially when, PERHAPS, a few people on that plane "lost it."

Not something you want to have as your last memory of your loved one.
2 posted on 09/16/2002 5:53:58 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
I have a theory. The clock on the recorder wasn't calibrated with the seismologists clock.
3 posted on 09/16/2002 6:09:57 AM PDT by sharktrager
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
...it would serve no purpose to play this part of the tape for the familes. Especially when, PERHAPS, a few people on that plane "lost it."

A more likely explanation is that the plane was shot down by a US fighter. Funny you didn't mention that as one of the possibilities.

4 posted on 09/16/2002 6:11:54 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
I wouldn't say that that's the likeliest reason for a missing three minutes on the tape.

The likeliest reason that the tape ended three minutes before the plane hit the ground is that the plane itself came to a end three minutes before hitting the ground.

I don't like to invoke conspiracy theories, but something just isn't right here.

First of all, the pattern of debris is not consistent with the plane hitting the ground in one piece. Parts of the plane were recovered miles from the point of impact, which would have been almost impossible if the plane came down in one piece.

Secondly, the missing three minutes of the voice recorder. If the passengers did in fact make it into the cockpit, there should have been at least some sign of it on the tape. It's hard to believe that the passengers and hijackers fought for control of the plane in relative silence.

And finally, if there's more to the tape than has been indicated, where's the transcript? Even if the last three minutes is very emotional, that's not a good enough reason to leave it out of an official transcript. There some be at least some indication as to what happened in the final few minutes of the flight, even if it is heavily edited for the sakes of the victim's families.




5 posted on 09/16/2002 6:12:11 AM PDT by altayann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
A more likely explanation is that the plane was shot down by a US fighter. Funny you didn't mention that as one of the possibilities.

This makes sense, but, I'm surprised that we have not heard from any witnesses. I keep thinking that someone on the ground must have seen something.

6 posted on 09/16/2002 6:22:22 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: altayann
Certainly sounds as if there's a chance it was shot down.
7 posted on 09/16/2002 6:23:27 AM PDT by jraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
The NTSB/FBI was able to suppress mainstream media coverage of the hundreds eyewitnesses who claimed to have seen a missile strike TWA Flight 800. There would be far fewer eyewitnesses to ignore in the farm country of Pennsylvania.
8 posted on 09/16/2002 6:30:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager
At this very moment, I have a cell phone that reads: 08:42 and a PC that reads: 08:36
9 posted on 09/16/2002 6:37:27 AM PDT by ChadGore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Glad I am not the only one who thinks this! I beleive it was shot down. Gov't. is hiding this. Why? If that is the case, they are still heroes (passengers aboard).If this is the case, let people know. Every terrorist in the world would realise our resolve as to that they will never win, no matter what the costs. My heart goes out to the man/men that carried out that order. Imagine the pain they are living with....
10 posted on 09/16/2002 6:42:08 AM PDT by TheWoodsarelovely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
And it took THREE MINUTES to fall???
11 posted on 09/16/2002 6:45:40 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TheWoodsarelovely
Last time I broached the subject that I thought Flight 93 was shot down I was attacked viciously. The fact that it was shot down does not take anything away from the courage of the passengers who took a stand. If I were President and three hijacked passenger jets had just attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and I knew a fourth hijacked plane was out there, I would order it to be shot down. It would be the only rational thing to do.

The main thing you have to understand about the federal government is that, like all psychotics, it would rather tell a lie than the truth, even when the truth would work better than the lie.

12 posted on 09/16/2002 6:45:50 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
And it took THREE MINUTES to fall???

Terminal velocity through the atmosphere is approximately 150 mph, depending on the aerodynamic properties of the falling body. Based on this estimate, it would take an object 3 minutes to fall from 40,000 feet.

That is in the ballpark.

13 posted on 09/16/2002 6:49:35 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TheWoodsarelovely

14 posted on 09/16/2002 6:50:14 AM PDT by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
At this very moment, I have a cell phone that reads: 08:42 and a PC that reads: 08:36

9 posted on 9/16/02 9:37 AM Eastern by ChadGore

.

.

And look what time you posted! :)

15 posted on 09/16/2002 7:03:24 AM PDT by dpa5923
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

It is well known that flight 93 was trailed by fighter jets that had asked for, and received permission to fire on the jet and take it down... They recieved permission from "the man"...

What would be the most likely scenario??? Do you think those fighter pilot(s) did nothing??

16 posted on 09/16/2002 7:03:43 AM PDT by Ferris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: altayann; E. Pluribus Unum
There was another FR thread that spoke to the theories about the mishap. I, along with many others, went into detail on the dynamics of aircraft mishaps and such.

I suppose some more expert in FR stuff can do a search and find it. Save you a lot of conjecture.

The clocks not being aligned is another excellent reason. On-board clocks are NOT linked to the US Naval Observatory Master Clock.
17 posted on 09/16/2002 7:13:58 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
How sad, if it's true the plane was shot down. What if the men on board were able to gain control of it, only to be shot down by our own military... Those words ("Pull up!") sound as if they did gain control of it.
18 posted on 09/16/2002 7:14:34 AM PDT by Tired of Taxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wrong ballpark. most commercial planes, if any ever fly at 40,000 feet. more likely they were at 30,000- 33,000 feet. how long would it take then?
19 posted on 09/16/2002 7:14:51 AM PDT by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Terminal velocity through the atmosphere is approximately 150 mph, depending on the aerodynamic properties of the falling body.

VERY dependent. We are talking about an object that routinely travels *500 mph* horizontally under, say, 80,000 - 90,000 lbs of thrust, but which weighs 200,000 lbs or so.

20 posted on 09/16/2002 7:15:05 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
Sounds like Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, got a hold of the tape.
21 posted on 09/16/2002 7:19:14 AM PDT by jws3sticks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
At 10:03, the hijackers - or possibly passengers and crew who were fighting to regain control of the plane - flipped a circuit breaker or switch that cut off power to the cockpit voice recorder.

The terrorists were trying to shut down the plane to cause a crash.

22 posted on 09/16/2002 7:20:34 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Not something you want to have as your last memory of your loved one.

Well, the families of the Flight 93 victims apparently wanted to hear it, unless they were informed beforehand that the tape was edited and have just kept their mouths shut about it.

23 posted on 09/16/2002 7:21:34 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
They recieved permission from "the man"...

Proof please.

24 posted on 09/16/2002 7:22:04 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
The clocks in my house are more than 3 minutes apart. I'm not suspecting a conspiracy.
25 posted on 09/16/2002 7:23:23 AM PDT by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
VERY dependent. We are talking about an object that routinely travels *500 mph* horizontally under, say, 80,000 - 90,000 lbs of thrust, but which weighs 200,000 lbs or so.

500 mph with two jet engines pushing it. You forgot about that part.

Pieces of a disintegrated aircraft are not very aerodynamic, so I probable overestimated their terminal velocity. On second thought, 120 mph is probably closer to the truth.

26 posted on 09/16/2002 7:24:03 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Do you have any idea how impossible it would be to keep what you allege secret?

My gawd, the pilots, the weapons loaders, the crew chiefs, the air traffic controllers, the base commanders (and their staffs), the national command authorties (and their staffs), the investigators. . .literally thousands of people would have had to spontaneously come together immediately after the shot and conspire to keep a secret of this nature. What?! This is nonsense.

BTW: It is not a "well known fact" that fighters were anywhere near the flight. It is a fact they were enroute, flying a front quarter intercept and were in no position, and were not in range of, the aircraft when it went down.

My gawd, the way Washington leaks there is no way we could have kept it quiet if we even had aircraft close to the flight, let alone actually shot it down.

27 posted on 09/16/2002 7:24:42 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Last time I broached the subject that I thought Flight 93 was shot down I was attacked viciously. The fact that it was shot down does not take anything away from the courage of the passengers who took a stand.

Tell me about it. It takes a brave soul to bring up the fact that there is a high probability that it was shot down - and there was nothing wrong with doing that.

The main thing you have to understand about the federal government is that, like all psychotics, it would rather tell a lie than the truth, even when the truth would work better than the lie.

AMEN!! It couldn't be put any better.

28 posted on 09/16/2002 7:25:47 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Snowy
This makes sense, but, I'm surprised that we have not heard from any witnesses.

You've heard what various news editors and TV producers have wanted you to hear. Even if there is no conspiracy of silence to cover-up eyewitness reports, I would think that many news people are reluctant to be seen as pushing the shoot-down theory, simply because of the potential PR problems.

29 posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:05 AM PDT by Trailerpark Badass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
Maybe one of the clocks was running fast...
30 posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:10 AM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The clocks in my house are more than 3 minutes apart. I'm not suspecting a conspiracy.

The clocks in your house are not as accurate as clocks used for global positioning, which can locate a plane to within +/- 2 inches based on the amount of time it takes for a radiofrequency wave to travel from a GPS satellite to the GPS receiver on board the aircraft.

31 posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:41 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
>>The clocks in your house are not as accurate as clocks used for global positioning, which can locate a plane to within +/- 2 inches based on the amount of time it takes for a radiofrequency wave to travel from a GPS satellite to the GPS receiver on board the aircraft.<<

GPS is not linked to the in-flight recorders.

Oh, and BTW, the 2-3" accuracy, we wish! That would make JDAM and other weapon systems a heck of a lot more accurate than they already are.
32 posted on 09/16/2002 7:29:32 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It was widely reported on TV and radio just days after the attacks by both Dick Cheney and the Pres that permission had been asked for and granted to fire upon the passenger jet after it had been acquired and trailed by the fighter jets...

In fact, the entire premise that flight 93 was shot down would not even exist at all unless massive amounts of people knew that flight 93 was actually trailed by armed fighter jets that had actually asked for and had actually been given permission to take it down...

The concept that the passengers and crew would just fly it straight into the ground with armed military jets locked on target becomes less and less plausible...

33 posted on 09/16/2002 7:30:03 AM PDT by Ferris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
My gawd, the pilots, the weapons loaders, the crew chiefs, the air traffic controllers, the base commanders (and their staffs), the national command authorties (and their staffs), the investigators. . .literally thousands of people would have had to spontaneously come together immediately after the shot and conspire to keep a secret of this nature. What?! This is nonsense.

You are telling me all those people were there? If you aren't, then there would be no need for a conspiracy BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T F*****G KNOW!!!!!

I get so weary of you conspiracy nuts who say that the government can do no wrong because it would require a conspiracy. It wouldn't. All it would take is for the small number of people involvled in any given incident to keep their yaps shut or have them shut for them.

34 posted on 09/16/2002 7:31:40 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
So your telling me the clocks on aircraft are no more accurate than the clocks in your house? Is that what you are telling me?
35 posted on 09/16/2002 7:32:55 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
It was widely reported on TV and radio just days after the attacks by both Dick Cheney and the Pres that permission had been asked for and granted to fire upon the passenger jet after it had been acquired and trailed by the fighter jets...

If it is so widely reported, perhaps you could point us to some of that "reporting".

36 posted on 09/16/2002 7:33:34 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Rendering????
37 posted on 09/16/2002 7:37:18 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
Oh man, that would be horrible to hear, I hope they never release it if that is the case.
38 posted on 09/16/2002 7:37:49 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yes.

Part of the pre-flight is to make sure the internal clock is running correctly. The on-board clocks are not tied to the GPS signal or the US Naval Observatory Master Clock.

As far as conspiracies go. . .don't know how else to describe what it would take to silence thousands of people.

Permission was granted to intercept and, if necessary, down a civlian airliner (with aircraft that had nothing but 20mm and no missiles), this in no way makes the case that the fighters were even close to the flight.

Well known fact the order to intercept--yes.
Well known "fact" that the flight was being trailed--no.

Time to calm down, bubba, and wipe the spit off your computer.
39 posted on 09/16/2002 7:42:29 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
So, sue me. . .
;-)
40 posted on 09/16/2002 7:43:47 AM PDT by Gunrunner2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
The article does not say whether the words "Pull up" came from a person, or from the ground avoidance system which produces a mechanical voice that says that.

Congressman Billybob

Click for major article on turnover in the House of Representatives: "Til Death Do Us Part."

Click for latest column: "The Star-Spangled Banner, Part II, & More Lies from the Media"

41 posted on 09/16/2002 7:44:56 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
As far as conspiracies go. . .don't know how else to describe what it would take to silence thousands of people.

That's what a conspiracy is, that is true, Boo-Boo. However, all those people you mentioned were not there, were they?

42 posted on 09/16/2002 7:46:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
I think such misuse of the English language speaks frankly of your intellect. Your reply is a reflection of your arrogance and lack of civility and good manners. I hope no one here takes what you have to say too seriously.
43 posted on 09/16/2002 7:51:36 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ferris
In fact, the entire premise that flight 93 was shot down would not even exist at all unless massive amounts of people knew that flight 93 was actually trailed by armed fighter jets that had actually asked for and had actually been given permission to take it down...

An outrageous falsehood. Go look at the FR threads from 9/11 when this was breaking news -- as soon as we knew there was a plane crash in rural PA, there was lots of (perfectaly reasonable) speculation of a shoot-down.

44 posted on 09/16/2002 7:51:40 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
500 mph with two jet engines pushing it. You forgot about that part.

I did? Really? Hmmm... then what did I ludicrously claim was providing the "80,000 to 90,000 pounds of thrust"?

45 posted on 09/16/2002 7:53:10 AM PDT by Sloth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
If the ground proximity alarm was sounding. There goes your 3 minute gap theory. It would be more like 30 sec, if was shot down that low.

46 posted on 09/16/2002 7:54:00 AM PDT by bluecollarman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
The plane was likely shot down by the military.
47 posted on 09/16/2002 7:54:07 AM PDT by Edmund Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
A couple of weeks ago I saw an interview with Jere Longman, the reporter who wrote "Among the Heroes". He carefully researched the crash and said categorically that the pattern of distribution of the plane's wreckage was totally inconsistent with the plane being shot down and totally consistent with an intact plane crashing at extremely high speed.
48 posted on 09/16/2002 7:55:05 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gunrunner2
interesting insight, there GR2....I've always had the 'shot down/brought it down...either way' attitude. Those people on Flt 93 were heroes, no matter what....but I appreciate your insight.

cool homepage, too, btw.....well, for an AF guy (ha ha....sorry...my brother flew an A-6 in the Gulf War....and is still in the Navy....gotta lean that way!)

49 posted on 09/16/2002 7:55:28 AM PDT by ZinGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeNewsJunkie
After listening to the entire tape, I thought that it ended rather abruptly. The plane is in the air—somewhere near cruise altitude (on would assume), then, suddenly, another aircraft reports smoke.
50 posted on 09/16/2002 7:56:08 AM PDT by TankerKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson