That might get a little closer to a "unified field theory"?
(With thanks to A.J.Galambos)
Originally the word liberal meant social conservatives(no govt religion--none) who advocated growth and progress---mostly technological(knowledge being absolute/unchanging)based on law--reality... UNDER GOD---the nature of GOD/man/govt. does not change. These were the Classical liberals...founding fathers-PRINCIPLES---stable/SANE scientific reality/society---industrial progress...moral/social character-values(private/personal) GROWTH(limited NON-intrusive PC Govt/religion---schools)!
Evolution...Atheism-dehumanism---TYRANNY(pc-religion/rhetoric)...
Then came the SPLIT SCHIZOPHRENIA/ZOMBIE/BRAVE-NWO1984 LIBERAL NEO-America---
I'm fairly certain Bock knew him.
(Let's face it: the number of freedom-minded individuals in the '60s with the capacity to convey their ideas beyond their immediate family was pretty small. Today's group is somewhat larger, to the point that there are even different flavors of objectivists.)