Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay flies turned on by heat
NewScientist.com news service ^ | September 16, 2002

Posted on 09/17/2002 12:15:14 AM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: N. Theknow
ne = be
21 posted on 09/17/2002 10:01:11 AM PDT by N. Theknow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
Does this explain the increasing gay communities in Miami & Key West?

....And their love of bath houses.

22 posted on 09/17/2002 10:03:32 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
They start listening to Babs Streisand and wearing apricot ascots.
23 posted on 09/17/2002 10:31:54 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
HOW on earth does one determine that a fly is gay?

Considering that insects do not have SEXUAL genitalia this article is complete B$

24 posted on 09/17/2002 10:33:32 AM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Bonobos also pick and eat bugs off one another and other such 'civilized' behaviors. I wouldn't say that these apes having homo sex makes it okay for humans, unless, of course, they days also want to start eating bugs off each other.
25 posted on 09/17/2002 10:38:25 AM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
Bonobos also have LOTS of sex, and the only sexual union that never happens is between close family members. Otherwise they run the whole gamut of sex .....from homo, to hetero, to even occasional orgies!

I guess that takes care of the "single-mated pair" theory.

26 posted on 09/17/2002 10:54:15 AM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gundog
Pretty ignorant comment, taxonomically speaking.

Not as ignorant as thinking you came from a monkey.

I think Ross Perot said it best: "If they look different, they are different."

27 posted on 09/17/2002 2:08:37 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
"Plain silly"

Correction- that's "Plain thilly"

28 posted on 09/17/2002 2:10:48 PM PDT by mafree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt; All
You have it all wrong, pal. Monkeys are as close to humans as snakes are to porcupines. In fact, if these monkeys you are talking about so alike with humans, how come they do not talk, read, write, or drive? Why don't you take you pro-homosexual propoganda BS over to DU, where it belongs?

Why are you attacking me? What wrong did i do?

As for the stuf on the Bonobo go to your local library and do research on them ...you will notice that every single thing i wrote about them is true! I am not the one who created the Bonobo ....hence you should not accuse me of having a homosexual agenda for saying what they do!

And by the way i have never been to DU (whatever that is), and i have no pro-homosexual propaganda! However that does not mean the bonobo doesn't do what i said it does.

And as for the closeness of the bonobo to humans again you should not blame me for that .....instead of calling me names go ask God why he created the Bonobo DNA structure to be 98% similar to Human DNA! I did not do that! Yet you come forth and write me off. And also to be honest with you with a 98% genetic similarity Bonobos are in truth closer to humans than foxes are to dogs! That is a fact.

And i am sure somehow i have rattled your little world, and maybe that is why you attacked me. However you should know that attacking someone does not change a thing ....and i am not the type to not post something because i fear i may offend someone called Houmatt!

And if you check my post you will notice there was nothing pro-homosexual in it! All i did is say what the Bonobo does ....and if you think that is not true do some research for yourself and prove me wrong instead of looking like some fool and accusing me of propaganda! I have no position on this ....i was just answering a post about flies by saying there is a mammal that regularly engages in all sorts of sex, including homosexual sex, and is not human ....the Bonobo.

And if that angers you go curse its creator ......however i have nothing to do with the Bonobo's behavior nor about its genetic closeness to humans.

29 posted on 09/17/2002 2:24:34 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
If you are not trying to spread pro-homosexual propganda, then why did you bring that $hit up in the first place?

And I did not call you names, either.

Lesson to be learned: Watch what you say in a conservative website, lest you get flamed.

30 posted on 09/17/2002 2:39:31 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt; gundog; All
To. Houmatt: By the way Houmatt, the premier sign of ignorance and atrophied intellectual acumen is attacking someone for saying something you did not agree with without providing backing for your point of view. All you did is attack me with your mindless vitriol and accuse me of spreading 'propaganda' and telling me to go off to some place called DU (i guess the D has to do with democrat) yet you gave no evidence of how i am spreading propaganda and why you attacked me.

And as for the Bonobo being propaganda: check out the Bonobo. It exists and it does what i said it does. I guess your ilk is the same type that said during the middle ages that the Sun and the rest of the Universe revolved around the Earth, and severely chastized anyone who said different. Something also tells me you might be among the bunch that believe the world is 6,000 years old or some hock like that!

And by the way you called me pro-homosexual (saying i have a pro-homosexual agenda means i am intrinsically pro-homosexual). I am not and am against it! I do not attack them though but i do find the behavior abhorrent (Christ did say hate the sin not the sinner so that is what i do).

However just because i am not pro-homosexual does not mean i cannot write about the Bonobo and its behaviors! And yes, Bonobos have loads of homosexual sex and have been doing so for ages!

And yes, they do share 98% of genetic similarity with man, making them closer than foxes are to dogs! This is an established fact that can be clarified and further proven if you could do a DNA sequencing between the Genetic Matter of a bonobo and that of a human! This does not make humans the same as Bonobos .......however we are 98% similar!

And as for your analogy :you saud that if Bonobos look so alike with humans, how come they do not talk, read, write, or drive?

I am sorry but there is no logical progression in that argument! It is terribly weak. First of all bonobos talk ......they do not speak German or English or any human tongue, but they are extremely efficient communicators.

And as for driving if that is your measure of 'being human' i pity your logic! If you go to New Guineau or to some of the more remote regions of Tibet you will discover communities of people who have yet to even see a car let alone drive it! They cannot drive. According to your above sentence they cannot be human!

And in South Africa there is the Khoi-San tribe (it is comprised of the Khoi-khoi and the San who are desert bush people)! There language is traditionally composed of clicks, whistles and other similar sounds (it is said it developed as their only language because they spent all their time hunting). The KhoiSan do not 'talk' in the way you think of talk ....but they are surely human (there DNA is 100% the same as yours ...unless now you want to tell me DNA does not exist).

I am not sayoing Bonobos are human. They are not. However they are 98% similar to humans, and just because they do not 'drive cars' does not mean they are not 98% similar.

I wish instead of attacking me and calling me pro-gay and that i am 'all wrong' you could give me evidence on why i am wrong! And if you read my post (no. 5) you will notice that no where did i say i was pro-gay or the like. Yet (because of issues only you can explain for yourself) you got annoyed that i mentioned the Bonobo.

To be honest with you people like you make me laugh. They get worked up whenever someone says something they never learnt in grade school and promptly attack the person. A couple of months ago some guy was saying i was a 'warlock' (seriously) and a 'habevite hashebavist' (whatever that is) and then started asking for a Red Heifer (according to some Jewish tradition the sacrifice of a pure Red Heifer will bring the Messiah)!

Maybe you know that guy, hmmm?

31 posted on 09/17/2002 2:48:39 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
And as for driving if that is your measure of 'being human' i pity your logic! If you go to New Guineau or to some of the more remote regions of Tibet you will discover communities of people who have yet to even see a car let alone drive it! They cannot drive. According to your above sentence they cannot be human!

Of course, they can drive. Give them a car and find out. I'm sure they could drive as well as you or I could the first time we got behind the wheel. And they can do calculus and trigonometry, too, if they have a teacher. And why are you so fascinated with chimpanzees having sex that you have to repeat it over and over. What are you, 12?

32 posted on 09/17/2002 3:03:03 PM PDT by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: far sider
Actually, I found the chimp story interesting FWIW, and while his reply to the driving point was quite weak - as you pointed out - this hardly alters his basic point (and the previous statement he responded to was, indeed, profoundly ignorant).

I find it curious that people are jumping all over him in the first place. Geeez. Some of you people need to deal with your issues...
33 posted on 09/17/2002 3:08:00 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: far sider
However, I do concur that having heard about the chimp issue once, I don't necessarily need to hear it another dozen times... ;^)
34 posted on 09/17/2002 3:09:57 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: far sider
First of all i ma not at all interested in Chimp sex .....however the fact that the Bonobo sub-species engages in mannerisms that are extremely unorthodox in the animal kingdom (and i do not just mean their sexual behavior) is something i find interesting.

And the reason i wrote a lot about Bonobo sexual behavior is because this thread was about animals with gay behavior ....and the Bonobo is obiously an animal with gay traits!

As for the reason why i repeated it several times it is because people like Houmatt seem to be getting annoyed that i brought up the Bonobo and they claim it is 'pro-homosexual propaganda' on my part. Obviously i had to ask them what part was 'pro-homosexual propaganda' and thus references to Bonobo sex sprouted up.

35 posted on 09/17/2002 3:14:32 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
i am off to alaska
36 posted on 09/17/2002 3:15:25 PM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: far sider
Furthermore look at what Houmatt posted to me in post no. 30! I am a conservative ....however according to people like Houmatt i should ignore factual evidence if it does not argur well with some of the beliefs of the 'conservative amalgamation.'

Trust me, i only intended to post about the Bonobo once. However when i get accused of spreading 'pro-homosexual propaganda' i have to at the very least defend myself, and in the process stuff about the Bonobo gets mentioned again.

37 posted on 09/17/2002 3:19:35 PM PDT by spetznaz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: spetznaz
(yawn)

See msg # 30.
38 posted on 09/17/2002 3:29:32 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Why do you think that's "pro homosexual propaganda" in the first place?! That's what perplexes me. Like I noted: some people have unresolved issues they should deal with...
39 posted on 09/17/2002 3:38:36 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
So what's new?
Most laboratory Flies have always been Fruit Flies.
8-))

So9

40 posted on 09/17/2002 3:41:44 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson