Big brain ping.
Posted on 09/27/2002 5:16:53 PM PDT by Condorman
By Seth Shostak
Senior Astronomer, Project Phoenix, SPACE.com
Relative to their size, humans have the biggest brains on the planet. Check out the guy sitting next to you on the bus: hunkered beneath a fringe of moussed hair and a few millimeters of skull are three crinkly pounds of brain -- the only substantive difference between you and species you regard as food or pets.
|
|
But how did this happen? What special circumstance, what unperceived evolutionary force, nudged our hulking, hairy ancestors toward intelligence, and silently trebled the size of their brains in two million years or less?
This question is seductive not only because it tells us something exquisitely interesting about ourselves, but also because the answer could give us insight into whether other intelligent beings really exist.
Many researchers have considered how the processes of natural selection might encourage higher IQ. For example, predator-prey relationships can do this. When a lioness bags an antelope, she’s more likely to snag one of the dumb ones. Result? The lioness has a meal, but the average ability of the antelopes has been raised. The next night, the dumber lions will have a harder time getting dinner, and will preferentially drop out of the leonine gene pool. In this animal arms race, the IQ of both species is ratcheted upward.
This is survival of the functionally fittest, and intelligence is certainly one component of making it in a competitive environment. But there’s another type of mechanism that might have been more important in creating our cerebral machinery. It’s called signaling for fitness, and it’s a widespread component of beastly behavior.
The way to understand signaling for fitness is to consider a canonical example: peacock tails. When choosing a mate, peahens prefer males with long, bright tails. This isn’t simply due to a quirk of their little pea brains; it’s good reproductive strategy. Those impressive tails are metabolically costly, and require both good health and success in finding food. In addition, a flashy tail can attract predators, which only the wily can avoid. So when a peahen spies a male with a well-endowed tail, she can be sure he has good genes.
If she chooses to get to know him better, their offspring will have a survival advantage.
For most species, males court and females choose. So it’s usually the males who are using these fitness signals as semaphores to indicate that they’re up to snuff. In the words of Geoffrey Miller, an evolutionary psychologist at the University of New Mexico, "evolution is driven not just by survival of the fittest, but reproduction of the sexiest."
So how does this dovetail with the evolution of intelligence?
Miller points out that musty theories claiming we developed our impressive cerebra from, for example, tool use, don’t seem to fit the facts. The stone axes chipped by our one-pound-brained ancestors were about as good as those made by their three-pound-brained successors. Instead, Miller suggests that the ramping up of IQ was the result of 100,000 generations of pre-human courtship operating on fitness signals made possible by brain power.
"The brain’s a really good indicator of fitness because its growth depends on at least half of the genes that humans have," he says. "A brain, after all, is very complex, very sensitive to genetic mutations, and costs a lot of energy to run."
If you have a good brain, you have good genes. They’re our flashy tail.
But it’s a messy business to literally display your brain. So how can a quality cranium signal its superiority to a mate? It does so with behaviors such as speaking well, or by demonstrating musical ability, a sense of humor, or creativity. These activities depend upon many parts of the brain, and consequently are reliable indicators of mental merit.
Brains are like the Dow Jones index, which is an accessible and generally trustworthy gauge of a complex system because it’s rooted in a number of important stocks.
So males strut their stuff by crooning, being witty, and speaking well, while the females use these clues to sort out the best one to take home to mom and dad. You might wonder why this mechanism would ever lead to women who are also clever. But that’s a natural consequence of the long maturation time of humans.
"Human males invest a whole lot more in being parents than any other primates," says Miller, "so the more they invest in their offspring, the choosier they should be about their long-term mate. This puts the females under evolutionary pressure; early in courtship to attract a high-fitness guy, but after that to keep him interested, to keep him from wandering off with some other woman. They’re strongly selected to tell interesting stories, to be continually amusing and charismatic in order to maintain the male’s commitment and investment in their children."
Miller’s ideas will no doubt affect your view of significant others. But what insights do they give into the likelihood of intelligence on other worlds?
"I think this is one of the key evolutionary processes that can produce intelligence anywhere in the universe," he says. "And it’s universal because any evolutionary system will have some kind of genetic code. That code will be vulnerable to mutations of some sort -- and fitness indicators reveal just how many mutations you have."
"Clearly, one of the best ways to signal is through behavior that can only be produced by a highly complicated nervous system whose growth depends on most of your genes. So in my view it’s a very powerful evolutionary process. There’s good evidence that it’s important in just about every other animal species. And we have one example -- us -- where it’s led to intelligence." And on other worlds around other stars? Miller laughs: "I think aliens who are obsessed with showing off their brain power to the opposite sex will be fairly common out there."
So if and when we discover the extraterrestrials, you shouldn’t be surprised to find that they are slick talkers, good musicians and -- unlike their Hollywood ciphers -- able to tell a decent joke.
Big brain ping.
My wife just told me that during our "nap". I knew she was smart!
Creationists have no sense of humor.
The only flaw in the doctor's theory.
That's not funny.
And conversely, the absence of such traits in the female should signal that she has become bored and disinterested.
Hmmm...this hypothesis seems to have some merit.
A magnificent arrangement! :-D
So many men, so little time.
Then why don't computer geeks get more women? Oh wait! We do. That 'geeks never get dates' thing is propaganda, intended to convince gullible women that we need them more than anyone else does.
Anybody buying this?
Please keep your quaint Victorian ethics to yourself. Life and love are meant to be savored, not hidden away in some moth-infested closet and simply trotted out for Sundays and Holidays.
It does so with behaviors such as speaking well, or by demonstrating musical ability, a sense of humor, or creativity.
Creationists have no sense of humor.
Yeah - but they make up for that with their creativity...
Oh yes, and replace the scent of boric acid and formadehyde with some expensive perfume. It might help.
Never figure the evolutionary angle on it though.
So what does it mean when a woman is totally computer illiterate? That she's aleady been bred, or won't breed? And the ones who get interested in it, that they're primping for reproduction? Gee, this sheds a whole new light on Customer Support.
The all-too-obvious translation for this is that you take what you can get. I prefer to be somewhat more selective.
14 posted on 9/27/02 6:32 PM Pacific by Piltdown_Woman
Well duh
; )
So use your great big brain to develop (or learn to convincingly fake) a smattering of social skills and be amazed at what happens.
Or maybe you don't get any chicks because you spend too much time whining about how you don't get any chicks...
Golly... With that sunny disposition and cheerful demeanor, I suspect you have your pick.
(You wanna back off the snark just a little bit?)
Actually, Scully is not a bad sort. There are other factors at work here.
I saw this sign at the local bakery
Coffee
Chocolate
Men
The richer the better.
Money has a lot more to do with procreation than many are willing to admit.
WOO-HOO! Ladies---Take a number! I got me a QUALITY cranium!
This could be problematic if you are dealing with an intelligent woman. ;-)
Consider my interference retracted, and I repent of my meddling ways for at least until the next time I meddle. ;^)
ROFL! But they've got good genes!
Ladies!.....Take a number!
If you lie a lot and promise extravagantly and you'll snag a chick who is either a) shallow enough to fall for a BS artist, or b) too stupid to tell the difference.
If this sounds like your dream girl, I'd say your course is set.
Ah but Darwininians have no sense, period.
This may be true for many, but personally I find materialism extremely boring. Everyone puts their pants (or pantyhose) on one leg at a time. Everyone dies. Those of us who are lucky enough to retain our looks past middle age have genetics to thank. Plastic surgery can help for a while, but there are only so many tucks and tweaks the surgeon can make.
Just keep thinking that way.
Perhaps, but atheistic evolutionists tend to better at abandoning themselves to the moment.
Nice of Seth Shostak to display his spiritual dearth in the second sentence.
When will hack scientists quit presuming they have anything more intelligent to say about theological matters than the average sanitation engineer?
What an unclever monkey.
Here is the Female Brain:
If that means senseless, I agree.
This assumes that sexual reproduction will be common elsewhere. As I understand it, sexual reproduction is a very big jump from an evolutionary prospective. Much bigger than even the move from single cell to multicellular organisms. Personally, I am quite sceptical that there are many worlds out there with lifeforms that reach beyond the single cell variety. There would be far less than that would have sexual reproduction where this mechanism could develop higher intelligence. In other words, Dr. Miller is dreaming.
Yes, to a point. Obviously, the growth enviroment for a child is very important was well, but smarts runs in families. This is clearly anectdotally demonstrated at any professional school.
But if you are referring to middle to upper-middle class wealth, I would agree that money makes the whole experience of child-rearing much easier.
However, as your screen name suggests, character to me is more important than wealth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.