Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SMOKING GUN URANIUM-GERMANY WHILE Ritter Stokes Islamic Hate
AP ^ | 9/29/02

Posted on 09/28/2002 2:12:10 PM PDT by Diogenesis

SMOKING GUN LINKS URANIUM to GERMANY WHILE IRAQ's PR Ritter Stokes Islamic Hate.

This is a MUST-SEE.

======== Turkey ===========

In Turkey, captured weapons-grade urainum ~33 pounds.
Detained two men from an east European country, cost ~5 million dollars


========== London =====

Meanwhile in London, Scott Ritter, former American, inflames one hundred thousand.




TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Germany; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: germany; iraq; islam; london; ritter; ritterisatraitor; ritteriswrong; saddamritter; schroeder; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-365 next last
To: Publius Maximus
...because we have a real President, who knows what to do in situations like this.
Jumping in conclusions before getting the facts,is the least I expect from this President.
261 posted on 09/28/2002 8:25:49 PM PDT by danmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: copycat
two camps, but the pro-usa camp is more about freedom and justice than it is about religion and prejudice
262 posted on 09/28/2002 8:31:58 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: ALS
Well, if you are asking me, I am no expert,
but it looks like Youranuom is a transliteration
of the word for Uranium in the language
of some former Soviet Republic.
263 posted on 09/28/2002 8:33:43 PM PDT by Nogbad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: dwills
two camps, but the pro-usa camp is more about freedom and justice than it is about religion and prejudice

But the other camp is about hatred of Jews and Americans, and anyone else who worships the God of Abraham.

264 posted on 09/28/2002 8:44:51 PM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Okay, thanks. That makes sense. Still, I'll bet we have a couple of smugglers right now suffering from radiation sickness. And I hope those Turkish cops took some precautions, too, before setting up their display. I wouldn't want to be anywhere near that stuff!
265 posted on 09/28/2002 9:01:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
I checked out the pictures on the strange website you linked which seemed to show pictures of an apparently injured (or dead) Bin Laden.

I compared the pictures to some online pictures of the real Bin Laden. One of the things that stands out in the online pictures of the real Bin Laden is that his nose points to the right of the peak of his beard under his chin. Looking at his face, Bin Laden's face is very assymetrical, and his nose points to our left (his right) compared to the peaks of his beard under his mouth. The injured man in the website pictures has the same assymetry. It is a strong match on this feature.

The salt and pepper pattern in his beard roughly fits the real Bin Laden as well.

One other feature is less clear. The injured man in the website has a strong lateral crease high on the bridge of his nose. Some of the pictures of the real Bin Laden don't seem to show such a crease, but some might ambiguously. None of the ones of the real Bin Laden I saw had a clear, unambigous crease high on the bridge of the nose like the injured man on the website has.

Does anyone have any good links to real pictures (not joke pictures) of the real Bin Laden from the last few years? Creases can appear for a number of reasons when they weren't there before, including health, exposure to the weather, and a collapse of the small capillaries because of circulation problems. The other features I checked matched the real Bin Laden, but this one seemed probably not to match, but then maybe a better picture of the real Bin Laden might show his nose in more detail.

266 posted on 09/28/2002 9:06:59 PM PDT by The Person
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: copycat
irrational haters of all kinds belong in the other camp

the golden rule that informs the conscience of rational people is a gift of biology--with or without god's intervention

you do not have the capacity to know how others should worship, but are merely fortunate to live in a place and time where people are encouraged to respect the religious freedom that they would seek for themselves
267 posted on 09/28/2002 9:10:15 PM PDT by dwills
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
The uranium wouldn't be super dangerous if handled correctly. But you know that even Marie Curie suffered some ill effects from handling the small amounts of radium in her lab over a period of decades. All the same I wouldn't want a bar of uranium in the car without a good reason. Smuggling wouldn't be a good reason.
268 posted on 09/28/2002 9:10:26 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Any questions about the enemys willingness to do anything?

269 posted on 09/28/2002 9:13:39 PM PDT by Madcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALS
How come parts are in english and parts aren't??

I call it Euro-speak. Most folks in the scientific and military comunities use this type of labeling. As long as it is simple, everyone concerned can read it easily.

270 posted on 09/28/2002 9:33:55 PM PDT by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Madcelt
Continue posting these pictures on a daily basis. Thank you.

Never Forget 9-11 Let's Roll

This was an act of war ! You are either with us or against us. Choose-

Terrorize terrorists, or prepare to be terrorized, by terrorists. (like we already have been over the past 25 years)


271 posted on 09/28/2002 9:36:40 PM PDT by freepersup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Does anyone know how big a bomb 33 pounds of uranium will yeild?
272 posted on 09/28/2002 9:38:57 PM PDT by EricT.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
Are we still, technically, at war with Iraq? I thought there was only a cease-fire in 1991 and NOT a peace treaty.
273 posted on 09/28/2002 9:48:55 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Do you think this will be big news on the talk shows tommorrow?
274 posted on 09/28/2002 9:53:04 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]

Comment #275 Removed by Moderator

To: EricT.
Too Damn Many. trust me FAR TOO many (depending on the Megatonnage desired)
276 posted on 09/28/2002 9:59:11 PM PDT by Madcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Robert_Paulson2
Any ideas on #9 or the rusty steel "youranium" cannister?
277 posted on 09/28/2002 10:01:23 PM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: woofie
It should be, but given the poor editorial judgement shown by major media outlets, I'm beginning to wonder. The news directors can take two tactics: (1) go with the priorities listed in the fax they appear to receive from the DNC or (2) actually use their professional judgement. My guess is that ABC and CBS are more likely to not discuss this matter. If they do mention it, they may downplay it by putting it 3rd or 4th in the line up. Fox will put it highest in the line up. NBC may put it high in the priority of stories and then Russert will try to move to discuss other Senatorial issues. CNN will continue to cover the story and act like they are breaking the news on the "type" of uranium involved. If the self-interest rules the day, CNN will come up with a breaking news story around 8 to 9 AM EST and let it play (in an attempt to lure from NBC/ABC/CBS/Fox talking heads).
278 posted on 09/28/2002 10:02:45 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: freepersup
Can't Forget these guys keep these pictures up as a reminder.

http://www.ashevilletribune.com/breaking_news_pictures.htm

Just type in this address

279 posted on 09/28/2002 10:03:06 PM PDT by Madcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
more HERE

This is datelined: The New Yorker

The Talk of the Town

December 13, 1999, p. 44

Although Iraq remains under a strict United Nations embargo, the embargo does not cover medical supplies. Last year, the Iraqi government ordered half a dozen lithotripters, which are state-of-the-art machines for getting rid of kidney stones. (The word "lithotripter" comes from the Greek for "stone breaker.") A lithotripter uses a shock wave to pulverize these painful objects without surgery. Machines like the ones Iraq bought require a high-precision electronic switch that triggers a powerful burst of electricity. In addition to the lithotripters, Iraq wanted to buy a hundred and twenty extra switches. That is at least a hundred more than the machines would ever need

280 posted on 09/28/2002 10:04:35 PM PDT by anapikoros
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 361-365 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson