Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Curse of T.E. Lawrence's Promise: The Phony Nation of Iraq
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/03/02 | Jack Wheeler

Posted on 10/03/2002 7:29:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Curse of T.E. Lawrence's Promise: The Phony Nation of Iraq

Jack Wheeler
Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2002
The most legendary American journalist of the 20th century was Lowell Thomas. I had the opportunity to meet him in 1978 when we were guests on the Merv Griffin show. Off camera, I asked him, "Do you feel you contributed, however inadvertently, to the political mess that is the Middle East today?”

He looked at me sharply and asked me what I meant. "Well, after all,” I answered, "it was you who gave Lawrence’s promise to the Hashemites so much power.” His eyes narrowed, and responded, "That was a long time ago.”

In 1917, Lowell Thomas was a young ambitious journalist in search of an interesting story in a lost backwater of World War I. In Jerusalem, he met a small (5-foot-4) British Army captain assigned as a liaison officer to Arabs living in a desert no one had ever heard of.

Thomas saw his chance. His breathless dispatches had the purpose of creating a myth around the liaison officer, who had begun teaching Arab tribes to blow up Turkish trains nobody cared about in the desert nobody ever heard of.

The liaison officer’s name was T.E. Lawrence, but Lowell Thomas called him "Lawrence of Arabia.” In 1919, Thomas went on a lecture tour in the U.K. and U.S., showing pictures of Lawrence posing in a sheikh’s robes in a London studio, and entranced audiences with stories about "the White King of the Arabs.”

By the time the Treaty of Sèvres was negotiated in 1920, with Lawrence in attendance and the media mob hanging on his every word, the British felt compelled to keep Lawrence’s promise to the chieftains of an Arab tribe called the Hashemites.

The political structure of the Middle East today is the result of that promise. The Treaty of Sèvres permitted the British to seize pieces of the Ottoman Empire, which had ruled the Middle East for centuries but joined the Germans in WWI. Instead of British colonies, the pieces were called League of Nations "Mandates,” for which the Brits needed puppet rulers.

One of these "mandated” areas was the west coast of Arabia, a desert region called the Hejaz. Lawrence had promised the chieftains of the Hashem tribe that if they would join the British against the Turks, they would get to rule the Hejaz as their own kingdom. Thus the Hashem patriarch, Hussein Ibn Ali, became the King of the Hejaz.

At Lawrence’s insistence, the Brits installed Ali’s son Feisal as ruler of the "mandate” of Syria, divided the "mandate” of Palestine in two, and installed Feisal’s brother Abdullah as ruler of the part east of the Jordan River (the western part eventually became Israel 28 years later, no thanks to the British).

Lawrence (and Thomas) had bought into the phony claim that the Hashem tribal leaders were directly descended from Mohammad himself. The Hashemites claimed that this assumed mantle of Islamic holiness gave them a right to rule, without elections, all Arabs everywhere. So the Brits created the Hashemite Kingdoms of Hejaz, Jordan and Syria.

The Invention of Saudi Arabia

Then a problem arose from out of the desert wasteland. The chieftain of the Wahhabi tribe from central Arabia, Abdul Aziz ibn Saud, kicked Ali out of Hejaz, took it over, and called his entire conquered area Saudi Arabia. The Hashemite Kingdom of Hejaz was no more.

In the meantime, the French claimed Syria was their "mandate” and kicked out Feisal. As a consolation prize, Lawrence insisted the Brits install Feisal as the ruler of yet another "mandate,” that of Mesopotamia. Created out of three former Ottoman vilayets (provinces) without any regard to national coherence, this area was renamed the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq.

Soviet-Saddam Connection

The Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan still exists (the current ruler, Abdullah II, is the first Abdullah’s great-grandson), but the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq was erased (with the entire "royal family” including Feisal’s grandson Feisal II slaughtered) by a military coup in 1958. Through the help of Soviet KGB agent Yevgeny Primakov, Saddam Hussein completed his control over the Iraqi military regime by 1979.

The bottom line to this saga is that Iraq is not a real country – like, say, Persia (Iran), which has existed for 2,500 years. It is an artificial construct and can only be held together by force.

The Phony Nation of Iraq

Iraq and its people have no history of nor familiarity with democratic institutions. The three former vilayets of which it is composed still have no mutual cohesiveness. Mosul in the north is Kurdish, Basra in the south is Shiite Arab, Baghdad in the middle is Sunni Arab. The Kurds, Shiites, and Sunnis all hate each other. It takes a Saddam to hold the place together.

And that’s why Saddam has been kept in place, and allowed to ignore all those U.N. resolutions. A disintegrated Iraq could easily mean an independent Kurdistan, which the millions of Kurds in Turkey, Syria and Iran would clamor to join, splitting apart those three countries. It could mean an independent Basra, or just an inchoate anarchy, another Somalia.

The fear of these post-Saddam scenarios is what drives much of the international frenzy against G.W. taking Saddam out.

It is to G.W.’s enormous credit that he has the intelligence to realize that the threat of Saddam’s rule vastly outweighs the threat of its dissolution, and has the determination to eliminate the former.

It will be near impossible, however, to eliminate the latter. Let us hope that G.W. accepts this reality and assiduously avoids desperate attempts to put the Humpty Dumpty of a post-Saddam Iraq back together.

America’s and the world’s security must no longer be held hostage to a promise made by a junior British officer to a bunch of camel-herders wandering around a lost desert 86 years ago – a promise made important by an ambitious journalist’s romantic froth of promotional puffery, resulting in incalculably tragic consequences as the Curse of Lawrence of Arabia.

© copyright 2002 Dr. Jack Wheeler and the Freedom Research Foundation

This article originally appeared in the October 2002 issue of Strategic Investment, an Agora publication.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Media Bias

Middle East

Saddam Hussein/Iraq


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: appeasement; babylon; baghdad; desertstorm; dictatorship; enduringfreedom; holywar; hussein; infinitejustice; iraq; islam; islamicjihad; israel; jihad; jimmcdermott; justcause; kurds; mcdermott; middleeast; mideast; muslim; nation; phony; poisongas; saddam; saddamhussein; terror; terrorism; terrorist; terrorists; war

1 posted on 10/03/2002 7:29:52 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Wow. Pretty interesting stuff.
2 posted on 10/03/2002 7:37:06 AM PDT by The G Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Great article.
3 posted on 10/03/2002 7:45:57 AM PDT by thisiskubrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Terrific article! Thanks for posting it. It answers my question of who made the Sauds "royalty." Had a feeling it was that way.
4 posted on 10/03/2002 7:58:53 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
It is amazing how much of the fighting the US has been involved in recently has been because of the the post WW I breakup of the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires and the failure of the League of Nations.
5 posted on 10/03/2002 8:10:05 AM PDT by KarlInOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
sounds like the perfect place to put the pals.
6 posted on 10/03/2002 8:47:21 AM PDT by Yehuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio
You could say that WWII followed as a result of WWI as well. Yet, somehow people in America feel that Europe has the answers to the world's problems because they've existed longer than us/US.
7 posted on 10/03/2002 10:23:18 AM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson