Skip to comments.Bush dead wrong about Iraq
Posted on 10/03/2002 3:24:16 PM PDT by Heartlander2
The Islamic Jihad will strike America after Bush invades Iraq. The level of violence and damage will likely exceed Sept. 11, 2001! This I can promise you.
Right now there are unguarded nuclear weapons in the U.S. waiting to be used by terrorists against us. Known as SADMs (Small Atomic Demolition Munitions) or "suitcase nukes," these pocket bombs have the blast power of 5,000 tons of TNT. Moreover, their surface radiation contamination and "fallout" magnifies the footprint of these man-portable weapons.
SADMs are part of the many Soviet Unconventional Warfare caches secreted throughout America (as we did in Europe) during the cold war in anticipation of general war between the USA and USSR.
There will be no extreme acts of Islamic terrorism in the United States if Bush does not massively damage innocent Arab lives, property, infrastructure and economic means. This I can also promise you.
The 9-11 attack was in direct retaliation for such "collateral" destruction during Desert Storm - even as Pam Am 103 (Dec. 1988) was retribution for the U.S. downing of an Iranian AirBus 300 (July 1988).
I am a loyal American citizen - not a mind reader, or in communication with any terrorist contact. The reason I know what will happen is because I understand the Holy Koran and Islam. I trained Afghan Muhajadeen, was an advisor in Saudi Arabia, and have conducted operations in East/West Africa (Muslims), Indonesia and Bangladesh. While this was more than 10 years ago, the Koran has not changed a single scintilla.
After the WTC and Pentagon bombings, I publicly assured Americans that there would be no further acts of Islamic violence as long as Bush did not go beyond reason in searching out and exterminating the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan.
The Koran is specific in concerning jihad warriors, revenge, and spiritual rewards. Islam cannot attack an enemy until attacked; then they must respond in a like degree - ergo following the Desert Storm blitz, the jihad targeted the WTC representing coalition economy, while the Pentagon was the primary military nerve center.
We had no Islamic terrorism in American until we attacked Iraq. The jihad assaults against the U.S. Marines in Beirut, U.S. Airmen in Saudi Arabia, and U.S. Navy in Yemen were in opposition to U.S. military occupation in Islamic nations. There are many ancient Arab sayings - the thrust of many being: If you don't want trouble with Arabs, leave them alone.
Not since the Goebbels and Hitler stage-production of the invasion of Poland, has the world witnessed such a snow job by the cast of George "mini-me" Bush and company trying to justify a second blitz of Iraq. They have failed to tie Saddam with Al-Qaeda, or prove that he has weapons of "mass destruction" beyond what we gave him during his seven-year war against Iran. What makes the Bushwhacker's cry for hair, eyes and teeth even worse is the means he intends to use.
General Wayne Downing is a friend of mine. Before serving in the White House as chief advisor to NSC-head Condoleezza Rice and Tom Ridge (Homeland Security), Wayne was CincSOCom (Commander-in-chief, Special Operation Command, at McDill AFB, Florida). Every Navy SEAL, Army Ranger, Paratrooper, Green Beret, and Delta Force operative was under his command. Wayne walked away from the White House on 26 June because he could no longer support the Bush plan for taking out Saddam Hussein.
The "Downing Plan" called for a small group of special forces working with Kurds and some dissident Iraqis to "cut the head off the snake" allowing the body to die, while placing only a handful of Americans in harm's way. Tommy Franks favored a 200,000-man military force to accomplish the same task. Bush gave the nod to Tommy and his army.
Back to my warning and promise. General Downing's plan is completely within the Muslim law forbidding any retaliation. The Bush-Franks solution demands an equal reaction - more homeland terrorism - this time possibly big-time!
More terrorism means more homeland defense. Where does it end? A slave is an example of a perfectly secure person. This is our country. We can stop the deployment of 18-year-old National Guardsmen and the invitation for greater terrorism in America. As individuals we can't do everything, but we can all do something. Notify our three congressmen to act for us in keeping our military guarding America so we can sleep peacefully at night. The Attorney General may say that Bush doesn't need Congress to attack Iraq, but it doesn't mean Congress can't bulldog mini-me before he stampedes the herd!
GIVE ME LIBERTY, OR BRING ME DEATH!
I mean, not to sell Bo short or anything, but the Downing plan depended on a lot of things going right at the same time.
Be Seeing You,
Why not expend about one twentieth of our nuclear arsenal starting in North Africa following the Islamic cresent on through to Indonesia. We can rid the World of this scurge. We don't have to beg for death.
Yeah, I brought this up a year or so ago because that ex-Russian (Colonel Lunev?) had mentioned in a radio interview that he knew for a fact that they had them stowed in the U.S.
Then several people jumped in saying that even if they were here, they require maintenance and would not be operational if just buried in the desert since 1970. Evidently they have more knowledge of nuclear weapons than I do, so I'll have to defer to their expertise...
But a couple of things we do know is that they do exist (even some ex-U.S. Army personnel have said that - designed to damage mountain passes, etc), and that they may be here. Whether they are operational, or whether they can be used for other purposes (contaminating something) I don't know...
Mr. Gritz is functioning as a mouthpiece of the Islamic Jihad, is that it? Is that also really the case with all the other nutcases out therè? If so, why are they out of jail?
LOL! You got that right. Besides, should we believe anyone with a name like Gritz? I mean I like my grits[z] with fish and lots of ole sour(salted key lime juice). But hell, I mean Bo Gritz! Sounds awful.
Any residual respect I had for Bo just vanished. He doesn't seem to understand the difference between the mind of a truly defeated enemy and an undefeated one. It may not end with Iraq, but I can guarantee Bo this: When President Bush's (mini-me?...what an a** you are, Bo Bo) vision of the war has played out, there will be NO MORE attacks on America by camel humpers.