Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jerry Falwell is our Hero!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Ops4 ^ | 10/7/02 | Ops4

Posted on 10/07/2002 2:34:48 PM PDT by OPS4

The National Council of Churches is attacking Jerry Falwells stance on 60 minutes. Please email him and support him through all news outlets and at his Liberty University Site.

Christians and Jews are under enormous attacks worldwide, and it is time we all unite with one voice.

God Bless America! Ops4


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: falwell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-182 next last
To: dubyagee; chookter
Quite often, throughout the Old Testament, He used heathen nations to try and 'wake up' His people. When the prophets would try to warn them in advance, they were murdered.

Yes, and God also struck people down and allowed them to suffer and die from horrible diseases several places in the Bible.

Would that justify us going into the Hospitals where people have terminal diseases and tell them their own sins are to blame for what's happened to them?
We could easily point out verses in the Bible that are examples of this, just as some on this board are doing.

This simple-minded application of scripture by those who think the Bible is there for them to judge others with, especially those who have just suffered a horrible crime or misfortune...is reprehensible and meanspirited.

141 posted on 10/08/2002 4:25:15 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Comparison is perfectly valid. The argument on this forum put forward by yourself and others was that it is "sick" (your word) to believe that God would punish a nation as a whole for the sins of a portion of its populace. Your argument I suppose is that it is unfair to punish a "nation" and therefore innocent people for the sins of individuals. Maybe yes, maybe no. All I'm saying is that Lincoln clearly held that this was something which God in his wisdom would impose. In this respect Lincoln's position was absolutely consistent with what Falwell suggested. I'm not even saying I agree with Falwell on this. But if Falwell's philosophy on this is "sick", than so is Lincoln's.

Get's a little stickier when you find yourself on the other side of the table from old Abe, doesn't it Buckoo?

142 posted on 10/08/2002 4:49:28 PM PDT by mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
This simple-minded application of scripture by those who think the Bible is there for them to judge others with, especially those who have just suffered a horrible crime or misfortune...is reprehensible and meanspirited.

I do not judge others. I do judge actions. And I am not offended when someone calls me a sinner. The last time I checked, I am and so is everyone else on this earth. The fact is we sacrifice our children and any scruples we might have to the god of Self. This is a fact and one I'm certain God is not pleased with.

143 posted on 10/08/2002 4:54:03 PM PDT by dubyagee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Why you think an atheist's opinion on Falwell is noteworthy is beyond me.

144 posted on 10/08/2002 4:58:09 PM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: beckett
He is an utter fool.

Pot, meet kettle.

145 posted on 10/08/2002 5:32:30 PM PDT by Jim Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
There is a difference between God's punishment and His not protecting us or blessing us because of our sin. Falwell never said God caused or blessed or was pleased with the events of 9/11 because of our sin (and no doubt Osama and company will go straight to Hell). Falwell merely said that God stepped aside from protecting us and allowed the evil intent of others to succeed.
 
Not only that.... but he was saying it to Pat Robertson on The 700 Club. Who the heck watches it anyway? Maybe some Christians, and obviously anti-Christians looking for the rope to hang him with.
 
The way people were carrying on you would have thought he'd issued a press release to The New York Times.

146 posted on 10/08/2002 5:38:25 PM PDT by AnnaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott
A non-responsive reply. Why am I not surprised?

Furthermore, in a interesting display of your cognitive abilities, your reply can only lead one to believe that you agree Falwell is an utter fool. And here I thought you were defending the guy.

147 posted on 10/08/2002 5:43:55 PM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: mosby
The argument on this forum put forward by yourself and others was that it is "sick" (your word) to believe that God would punish a nation as a whole for the sins of a portion of its populace.

Wrong. That is not the argument at all.

The disagreement is with sanctimonious self-righteous people who claim to have some devine knowledge of a correspondence between some horrible crime, such as the murder of 3,000 innocent and unsuspecting civilians..and some sin or sins they decide this act is punishment for.
And the fact that they point their fingers at those things which just happen to be their pet peeves.
Big surprise.

The idea that anyone would exploit such a horrific crime against so many humans as an opportunity to push their personal agenda is warped and meanspirited.

Get's a little stickier when you find yourself on the other side of the table from old Abe, doesn't it Buckoo?

I didn't disagree with Lincoln at all.
I disagreed with your unbalanced and inaccurate application of his words to this situation.
Saying a nation is suffering for it's own doing is not the same thing as blaming a nation for an attack by murdering terrorists.
A distinction which seems to have gone over your head.

148 posted on 10/08/2002 5:56:25 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Ah, I see. So only you can divine when a national tragedy is a punishment from God and when it isn't. Falwell can't, but you can. Sounds like you have a flaming case of sanctimomy yourself. By the way your distinction is senseless. In both cases the "sin" for which the punishment is claimed to be visited is America's. Slavery (I assume) in one case, and abortion, homosexuality, etc, in the other. The only distinction is the vehicle for delivering the punishment. Are you suggesting that God would never use a "non-American" source for exercising his wrath. If so, please explain where this amazing new "theology" comes from. If it's a civil war, it's a punishment from God, if it's a terrorist attack it isn't?
149 posted on 10/08/2002 6:30:52 PM PDT by mosby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
bad link, what was on the program?
150 posted on 10/08/2002 6:32:34 PM PDT by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
I'm no fan of Falwell either, but I wouldn't call his comments 100% inaccurate. Once again, I'm not trying to denigrate Muslims or Islam as a whole, just some history.

Like many of you have said, most people aren't refuting what Falwell said, they're just attacking him for his character.

On the whole Muhammad=terrorist thing, I'd just like to quote from the history textbook I'm currently studying from (which is, for the most part, left-of-center in how it describes coditions):

At Medina, Muhammad established the ummah, a single community distinct from other people. But the Muslims were not content to confine themselves to a minor outpost at Medina. Above all, it was essential for the success of the new religion to control Mecca, still a potent holy place. In 624, Muhammad led a small contingent to ambush a huge Meccan caravan brimming with goods; at the Battle of Badr, aided by their position near an oasis, he and his followers killed forty-nine of the Meccan enemy, took numerous prisoners, and confiscated rich booty. This was a major turning point for the fledgling religion. With the Battle of Badr, traditional Bedouin plundering was grafted to the Muslim duty of Jihad (literally "striving", but often translated as "holy war").

The battle of Badr was a great triumph for Muhammad, who was not able to consolidate his position at Medina, gaining new adherents and silencing all doubters. For example, the Jews at Medina, whom Muhammad had at first seen as allies, had not converted to Islam as he had expected. Right after the Battle of Badr, suspecting them of supporting hostile tribes, Muhammad atacked the Jews at Medina, eventually expelling, executing, or enslaving them.

Source:The Making of the West:Peoples and Cultures Volume A:To 1500 P.284

151 posted on 10/08/2002 6:55:35 PM PDT by zapiks44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mosby
Ah, I see. So only you can divine when a national tragedy is a punishment from God and when it isn't. Falwell can't, but you can. Sounds like you have a flaming case of sanctimomy yourself.

What are you talking about?
Nowhere did I ever claim the ability to "divine when a national tragedy is a punishment from God and when it isn't."

How silly. Try to respond to positions I actually take instead of making up those you want to argue against.

By the way your distinction is senseless.

Huh? The distinction between blaming a nation of people for what they are clearly doing to themselves, and blaming them for what some outside force comes and does to them.... is senseless?
It's amazing to me that you cannot, or refuse to recognize the difference.

Anyone who cannot see the difference between blaming a person for what they do to themself, and on the other hand blaming them when so maniac commits a horrible crime against them, has totally lost their moral compass.

If you don't get the distinction now, I guess you never will.

152 posted on 10/08/2002 7:58:25 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: steve-b
YOu people are as stupid and deliberately thick headed as any liberal! Incredible! Can I not state a hypothesis for reasonable discussion without being attacked by you pack of dogs? Can you no discertain the difference between stating what has happened in the past and drawing a possible conclusion and a person who claims to know God's will?

I am getting so sick of you people! I believe that you are as rabidly anti-Christian as the liberals!
153 posted on 10/08/2002 8:42:54 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
You are a fool as well as a Christian basher.
154 posted on 10/08/2002 8:43:54 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: mosby
that it is "sick" (your word) to believe that God would punish a nation as a whole for the sins of a portion of its populace

Not 'a nation'--America on 9/11/2001. Not 'a nation as a whole'--3000 countrymen. Not 'a portion of its population'--just the ones you don't like. You couldn't bear to say the specifics, could you?

What does that tell you?

155 posted on 10/08/2002 9:19:43 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
I believe that you are as rabidly anti-Christian as the liberals!

I AM a Christian. Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. He is the risen Messiah, to know him is to know His Father. I ask Him into my heart that he may wash away my sins and make me worthy of his Grace. Amen.

I still vehemently disagree that God 'let' 3000 of my countrymen die at the hands of murderous arabs 'cuz of the homos, abortion, nudie pictures, or Disney Gay Day.

156 posted on 10/08/2002 9:30:25 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Would that justify us going into the Hospitals where people have terminal diseases and tell them their own sins are to blame for what's happened to them?

That's exactly right. 'See I told you so' is not a Christ-like emotion, it's sick and self-gratifying.

157 posted on 10/08/2002 9:36:37 PM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: chachacha
I understand and agree. But like you say most will not discern the message.
158 posted on 10/08/2002 9:41:04 PM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Islam is a sick cult and a false religion.
159 posted on 10/08/2002 9:44:07 PM PDT by southland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OPS4
"Every good Christian should line up and kick Jerry Falwell's ass."
--Barry Goldwater

I agree with Barry......

redrock

160 posted on 10/08/2002 9:47:04 PM PDT by redrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson