Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sniper Shootings Prompt Call for More Gun Control
CNS ^ | 11 Oct 02 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 10/11/2002 8:05:05 AM PDT by white trash redneck

If the United States had a federal law requiring so-called "ballistic fingerprinting" of every firearm in the country, could police have already caught the murderer coming to be known as the "Beltway sniper?"

That is the assertion in a message sent to supporters of the group formerly known as Handgun Control, Inc.

"As police try to track down and stop this killer, we do know this: sensible gun laws can help law enforcement solve crimes as well as prevent gun violence," wrote Sarah Brady, chairwoman of the Brady Campaign.

Brady noted that ballistic comparisons of the bullets recovered from the victims' bodies had helped authorities link several of the shootings.

"[But] we have also seen the limitations to ballistic fingerprinting laws in their current form," she continued, complaining that the laws are only in force in two states, only cover newly purchased weapons, and only apply to handguns.

"These limitations speak to a need for a national ballistics fingerprinting law for all firearms," Brady argued.

She also used the letter to begin lobbying for a continuation of the federal ban on certain types of military-looking firearms, commonly referred to by opponents of their ownership as "assault weapons," and to solicit funds for her organization.

Americans for Gun Safety (AGS), a group founded by former Handgun Control, Inc. board member Andrew McKelvey, also supports universal ballistic fingerprinting. Matt Bennett, spokesman for the group, said the idea behind the process is similar to that of fingerprinting.

"A particular set of markings [on a bullet] can be matched to all the other [ballistic records] in the system and the top five or six matches come up and then a human expert will look at them and determine if there's a real match," he explained.

AGS argues that the system is accurate even if someone intentionally tries to alter a weapon, or subjects it to heavy use.

"It can degrade slightly, but it is still recognizable," Bennett claimed. "The metaphor we're using is it's like having a scratch on a record. It does degrade the quality of the sound, but it's still a recognizable sound."

Kevin Watson, legislative director for the Law Enforcement Alliance of America (LEAA) - a coalition of current and former law enforcement officers and citizen supporters - disagrees.

"It sounds really neat when you hear just the basic description of it, but when you go into the description of how it would actually work," he said, "it kind of falls apart."

Watson said the "ballistic fingerprint" of a weapon will change over time, and can be altered intentionally.

"In a lot of firearms, you can replace the equipment that leaves these marks," he said, "and, as the firearm is used on occasion, that degrades the marks that are left and sometimes can change them."

Watson described the lack of a basis for comparing ballistic markings to human fingerprints.

"Imagine a fingerprint database where people can switch their fingerprints and their own fingerprints wear down over time after use," he added. "It makes it not that useful of a system."

Attorney Lisa Steele, who specializes in appellate criminal defense cases, agreed. She said it would be relatively easy for a ballistics examiner to make a mistake.

"A recovered bullet has been through a lot. It's gone down a gun barrel, it's been fired into something. It's chipped. It's damaged. It's fragmented," Steele explained.

She said examiners are trained to expect some of the marking on two bullets fired from the same weapon not to match. They are also told, Steele said, to expect many markings to match on two bullets fired from two different weapons of the same caliber and model.

"They're trained to do this. They observe this in the lab," she said. "What the training standards say is, eventually you develop a 'gut instinct' for which of these striation matches are important and which of them aren't."

Steele calls the phenomenon of seeing matches that don't really exist "suggestion bias," explaining that the examiners are not intentionally giving false reports, they simply "expect to confirm what they already believe."

Investigators can also bias ballistics examiners, she claimed, by sharing too much information about a case or the evidence being examined.

"You know some things won't match. You know some things will. You have to make a 'gut,' instinctive decision, and in the back of your head, somebody has given you information that it's supposed to match," Steele said. "Odds are, you're going to say it does match."

The biggest part of the problem, she added, is that unlike classifying human fingerprints, there is no objective reference standard for ballistic "signatures.

Images of human fingerprints can be laid one on top of the other and the number of points of similarity can be counted, Steele explained. In most jurisdictions, criminal judges have established the minimum number of points of similarity that they will accept to validate a fingerprint match.

"There's no such objective measure for ballistic fingerprints," she said.

Watson said another failing of ballistic fingerprints opponents of armed self-defense often ignore is the sheer number of firearms already in private hands in the United States.

"If you were just to do new firearms, that basically means that there would be 200 million firearms that would not be traceable in this system," he explained. "Any criminal would know or would learn that if they wanted to make sure their gun was not traceable in the new system, they would simple make sure they were using a gun that was made before the enactment of the system."

Watson speculated that law-abiding gun owners might not be willing to bring their weapons in for ballistic fingerprinting because of the de facto registration of gun owners such a system would create.

He also disputed Brady's claim that the so-called "assault weapons" ban - which actually banned military-looking semi-automatic firearms, not fully-automatic assault weapons - could have had any effect on the sniper's armament.

"They could be using a gun that they could lawfully purchase today in Maryland, even if the 'assault weapons' ban is in place or renewed," Watson argued. "The notion that, if we renew this ban then we'll somehow pretend to keep certain guns off the street is really kind of nonsense."

Brady's attempt to capitalize on the murders to promote her anti-Second Amendment agenda is "quite honestly shameless," Watson said, especially while police are still looking for the sniper.

"This is a group that, every time tragedy happens, they jump out and say 'We need these [gun control laws] we need these," he alleged. "It's not really all that surprising to see it happen, but it's still shameless."

The premise that a gun control law could somehow affect the behavior of a murderer is puzzling to Watson.

"It's just a nonsense comment to say that somebody is going to break the law about murder, but obey the law about which tools they can use," he said. "It's pretty obvious that people who are not influenced by laws banning murder aren't going to be too influenced by laws banning what tools of murder they can use."

Both Watson and Steele believe that, once a suspect is in custody and ballistics examiners can compare his or her weapon to the bullets and shell casings recovered at the crime scenes, authorities will be able to use that evidence to aid in obtaining a conviction.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: banglist; beltwaysniper; guncontrol
As with Columbine, the gun controllers are dancing in the victims' blood.
1 posted on 10/11/2002 8:05:05 AM PDT by white trash redneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
I suppose we should outlaw murder as well.
2 posted on 10/11/2002 8:06:30 AM PDT by Skooz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Does anyone know if bullet-proof vests are illegal for the public to buy and use for safety reasons?

If they are they shouldn't be!

3 posted on 10/11/2002 8:13:38 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
What nonsense. To change the "fingerprint" one need only change the barrel. Fingerprint all barrels? A machinist can easily make or change the barrel. Make manufacturing of or changing of barrels a crime? How do you enforce that? You can change the marks left on a bullet by a barrel by use of a file on the barrel. Register all files? What if the weapon used is a shotgun? They have no rifling, hence no marks. Outlaw shotguns since they can't be identified that way? Where will all this end?
4 posted on 10/11/2002 8:14:45 AM PDT by maximus@Nashville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
Here you go

http://www.uscav.com/shop/uscsearchresultsr.asp

5 posted on 10/11/2002 8:16:38 AM PDT by always vigilant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
"If you were just to do new firearms, that basically means that there would be 200 million firearms that would not be traceable in this system,"

No problem (for the gun grabbers). The simply pass a law forcing all FFL holders to turn over their Form 4473's and then a law to attempt to force all gunowners to bring their guns in for "fingerprinting". While you are at it, you can leave a DNA sample for the police.

6 posted on 10/11/2002 8:17:15 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Of course they blame it on the gun.

But the gun needs one important thing before it goes off. That is the human pulling the trigger, the human eyes that look in the sights, the human hands to load. Should we outlaw humans because they might be dangerous?
7 posted on 10/11/2002 8:17:41 AM PDT by o_zarkman44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
Oops that didn't work so well. Go to www.uscav.com and search for vest.
8 posted on 10/11/2002 8:17:49 AM PDT by always vigilant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
How about banning evil thoughts?

A fanatic lunatic like this one would get a gun or something worse, regardless of any laws.

But the chorus of idiots from the left calling for more gun control is unabated. If every gun in the hands of law-abiding citizens were removed tomorrow, this would still go on, and then they would be complaining about pictures about guns and books on guns.

They are actually nuttier and scarier than the sniper. There is only ONE of him.
9 posted on 10/11/2002 8:19:26 AM PDT by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
...and of course, anyone bent upon mass murder would be decent enough not to modify his weapon to alter the markings.
10 posted on 10/11/2002 8:19:51 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Gee, I see that the "sniper" really cares about the fact that guns are outlawed in Washington, DC. I see that the laws against murder are really stopping him as well.
11 posted on 10/11/2002 8:20:05 AM PDT by FormerLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
The gun control issue defeated Gore in his own home state, the Demoncrats would be well advised to treat this issue like a hot and unwanted potato.
12 posted on 10/11/2002 8:21:49 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
These disarmed victims in legislated gun-free kill-zones are dependent on luck.

Registration gimmick reducing crime? Peace in our time? Only if it is Rest in Peace. We're subject to registration both ways.

Fix bayonets.
13 posted on 10/11/2002 8:23:51 AM PDT by SevenDaysInMay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Thanks for the link...
14 posted on 10/11/2002 8:26:13 AM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
This should be a call for people to get armed.
15 posted on 10/11/2002 8:27:28 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: krodriguesdc
What use would you have for a bulletproof vest? Try to provide yourself some protection against a sniper in your town! Yeah, like that will happen. Only people with crime and shootouts with the police on their minds want body armor. /endsarcasm
17 posted on 10/11/2002 8:49:39 AM PDT by MichiganConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: o_zarkman44
That is the human pulling the trigger

Please, the people who commit murder should be coddled and given therapy to get over how their mommy and daddy were mean to them when they were 12. You're also totally discounting the intrinsic psychic powers of firearms, knives and other weapons. They make people just go nuts or think they're cowboys and start shooting or stabbing. /endsarcasm

18 posted on 10/11/2002 8:53:34 AM PDT by MichiganConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Typical lame ass liberals, like offenders use registered legal guns. *sigh* Brains are so scarce these days!
19 posted on 10/11/2002 8:55:22 AM PDT by dokmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

To: Skooz
Exactly. If more gun control laws would eliminate this kind of thing, why don't the lefties call on the Israelis to enact more "suicide bomber control" laws? Then that'll disappear as well.
21 posted on 10/11/2002 9:02:31 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
You know, if only it WERE that simple, I'd be the happiest woman alive. But the technology for mayhem will always run ahead of the laws to "control" it - especially if they're not enforced.

What a terrible waste of resources.
22 posted on 10/11/2002 9:06:52 AM PDT by mrs. a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wny

23 posted on 10/11/2002 9:12:19 AM PDT by Jzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
And did you notice how the TV coverage of the ATF "Show and Tell" about the TYPE of weapon suspected focused on those nasty looking -- shudder -- "assault rifles," almost completely neglecting the far more accurate bolt action hunting arm???

These stories are typically reported by bubble-headed infobabes who have never even handled a weapon, let alone FIRED one. And an equally ignorant public buys this crap!

If you're going to take ONE SHOT, the weapon of choice is a scoped bolt action rifle with a heavy competition barrel, NOT the nasty looking assault rifle designed for rapid-fire combat situations.

HERE'S ONE SOLUTION! Hey, it worked for Adolph!!

CAMP GUNFREE.
A common sense and historically proven way to keep those dangerous and destructive GUNS out of YOUR life.
MEMBERSHIPS AVAILABLE NOW!
Details below

Concerned about the easy availability of guns in our society?

Alarmed about the "gun nuts" and other freedom wackos the government allows to run loose?

Wish the government would just repeal the Second Amendment and confiscate all the guns because you believe sensible people shouldn't suffer because of some idiotic notion about some antiquated “right?”

While we can't take the guns away from the people, we CAN take the people (or at least SOME of them) away from their guns.

At CAMP GUNFREE, we have created an atmosphere of near-total tranquility where you and your family will experience the benefits of a GUN FREE environment.


The unique main gate at Camp GunFree. Most arriving camp guests never see this view from their comfortable rail cars.

Each of our camps is a gated community designed to keep guns away from camp guests. Firmly enforced security measures ensure that these dangerous and destructive devices are kept outside. Each camp boasts 24 hour, 7 day a week sentries and state-of-the-art enclosure systems, guard dogs, trenches and surveillance equipment to absolutely GUARANTEE that no firearms enter the facility. Rigidly controlled access ensures that no guns can ever be smuggled in.

No cost has been spared to ensure that Camp GunFree remains gun free.

All camp members are given distinctive uniforms to distinguish them from any gun-toting barbarians who might attempt to evade our security measures. Each camp member is also assigned a distinctive ID number to ensure that only the right people are allowed within the camp.


Room and board are provided to each member in exchange for rewarding tasks designed to provide a sense of accomplishment and to demonstrate that large numbers of people CAN exist in a gun violence free community.

Camp members engaged in one of our many fun-filled organized work activities.


The current headlines prompt us to remind you that there has NEVER been a shooting by a student in any of the camp schools and we can GUARANTEE that there never will be!!

For more information, call 1-800-GUNFREE
OR visit our new website at
http://www.privategunsareabadthingandwe'llseethatyouare”safe”.batf.gov

(This idea from a pamphlet originally created by The Minnesota Center for Individual Liberty, PO Box 32170, Minneapolis, MN 55432-0170)

24 posted on 10/11/2002 9:19:07 AM PDT by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
Murder and mayhem were UNHEARD of before guns were invented. /sarcasm.
25 posted on 10/11/2002 9:20:28 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
If all firearms were ballistically fingerprinted, what idiot would use a gun that could be traced to himself.
26 posted on 10/11/2002 9:22:10 AM PDT by ampat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dick Bachert
," almost completely neglecting the far more accurate bolt action hunting arm???

Darn! Didja hafta tellem the truth??

27 posted on 10/11/2002 9:22:32 AM PDT by litehaus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
HI. MY NAME IS HILLARY.
I WANT TO RUN THE UNITED STATES SENATE!!

DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN! GO TO:

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate

28 posted on 10/11/2002 10:08:34 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
Want to receive free headline firearms news sent right to your email box?

Then CLICK HERE or click on the graphic below!


29 posted on 10/11/2002 10:16:46 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Watson argued. "The notion that, if we renew this ban then we'll somehow pretend to keep certain guns off the street is really kind of nonsense."

STOP giving them ideas!

Damn, at this rate, the Crime Bill will not only be renewed, it will be altered to flat out ban the items that it affected the manufacture of the first time.

30 posted on 10/11/2002 10:17:54 AM PDT by FreeTally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
A simple way to get around this ballistic finger printing is to re-barrel your rifle or pistol with an after maket barrel...

Why dont we just label the anti-gunners as traitors for not upholding the constitution, then they can all be hanged...wouldn't want to shoot them, that would give firearms a bad name.
31 posted on 10/11/2002 10:35:15 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
go to this website http://www.bulletproofme.com/

This is the cutest vest I've seen:

32 posted on 10/11/2002 10:37:30 AM PDT by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Skooz
"I suppose we should outlaw murder as well."

-Since that isn't working so well, maybe we should make murder doubly illegal. With two laws for the same crime, no one will be murdered.

33 posted on 10/11/2002 10:40:12 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Keep in mind that gun control will help establish garage gunsmithing as a leading "cottage industry". This could be very lucrative, indeed!!!! I have several books on the subject already.
34 posted on 10/11/2002 11:20:24 AM PDT by You Gotta Be Kidding Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maximus@Nashville
? Where will all this end?

When we have the same situation here that they now have in the UK. People like Sarah Brady and McKelvey won't be satisfied until we are in the same boat as the Brits. Total ban on all handguns, and such severe restrictions on long guns that most hunters and target shooters over there are getting rid of their sporting firearms because keeping them isn't worth the expense and hassle. I understand there are some real bargains available over there on fine high-grade English shotguns and rifles.

35 posted on 10/11/2002 12:59:14 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: epow
The key line in this piece is..."to solicit funds for her organization." enough said
36 posted on 10/11/2002 1:08:44 PM PDT by bybybill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
"An Open Letter to the Maja Rushie...EnviroWhackos Responsible For Anthrax Terror!!"
Posted on 10/17/2001 1:43 PM Eastern by Mudboy Slim

"IMHO, the Anthrax mailings are far more likely to be the handiwork of the anti-American Leftists who make up the Enviro-Whacko Community, including the Effete Elite who comprise the Tenured Class within our American Universities!!!....Yes, my Wise FRiend, I said the Leftists in the Environmental Movement have got to be the Number One Suspects in the ongoing Domestic Terrorism Movement...please allow me explain!! You have always said that Lib'rals are the most hilarious when they are outta Power because they go absolutely crazy and yet can do no damage to this Country. Well, THE LEFT IS MOST DEFINITELY OUT OF POWER and it's driving them to measures that would have been unthinkable just six weeks ago. How do you think the Left feels when they read about Dubyuh's 89%+ Approval Ratings?! Well, on the DemocRATic Underground website, they are going absolutely NUTS!! Dick Cheney is well-advised to be making himself scarce with these deranged LeftistLoonies on the loose...THEY HATE US WITH A PASSION that they could never muster for Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein!!!"

Watch for this guy to be killed authorities in the next few days, but a suicide note will reveal him to be a DemonRAT Sympathizer!!

SITYS...MUD

37 posted on 10/11/2002 1:27:32 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
a need for a national ballistics fingerprinting law for all firearms

The ship of dreams has already left port and moved to a point beyond the horizon where reality is no longer visible even in the distance.

38 posted on 10/11/2002 1:31:40 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
Hey Einstein Brady...ever heard of valve-grinding compound ? Figured. One bullet dipped in that...and there go your genius barrel fingerprints. Frauds.

But that won't stand in your way of making more taxmoney jobs for "lawmakers" making more laws instead of enforcing the ones we already have. That would put your friends out of business.
39 posted on 10/11/2002 1:37:42 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator

To: white trash redneck
Sniper Shootings Prompt Call for More Gun Control

Article is meaningless. Headline says it all. But to be most accurate and save newspaper space, the headline should read...

Everything Prompts Calls for More Gun Control

41 posted on 10/11/2002 3:00:48 PM PDT by DakotaGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: krodriguesdc
No, body armor, according to Massad Ayoob, is legal to purchase and wear in all 50 states unless you are a convicted violent criminal or drug trafficker, or are committing a violent crime or drug trafficking.

Second Chance makes comfortable, lightweight concealable body armor that fits like a sweatshirt under your clothing. You may have some difficulty purchasing from them unless you have a character reference from someone in law enforcement, a CCW permit from some state, or some other indication that you're a card-carrying good guy.

42 posted on 10/11/2002 5:14:52 PM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: always vigilant
Oops that didn't work so well. Go to www.uscav.com and search for vest.

This item is restricted to Law Enforcement and Military only

43 posted on 10/12/2002 2:14:59 PM PDT by AStack75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #44 Removed by Moderator

To: krodriguesdc
Does anyone know if bullet-proof vests are illegal for the public to buy and use for safety reasons?

Don't get your hopes up on Kevlar stopping a center-fire rifle round that isn't pretty spent. It's mainly effective for handgun bullets.

45 posted on 10/12/2002 7:15:32 PM PDT by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
A couple of points about these HCI losers (/oxymoron):

1) Changing a ballistic "fingerprint" is incredibly easy - change the firing pin and barrel, or fire-lap the barrel and change the firing pin, or just fire the gun a few hundred times with several cleanings in between.

2) How about bullets fired from a saboted round? Get a sabot that is .308 in diameter and fire a .223 bullet - I guarantee you that there won't be a single mark on the bullet from the rifle used.

3) Criminals who are as disciplined and intelligent as this sniper (who is, just for clarification, an evil SOB that is absolutely devoid of any morality), won't be caught by any such system. They will either take the steps listed above to make the bullets they fire untraceable, will pay some underground gunsmith to do it, or will steal someone else's highly-accurate bolt gun (or pay a fence to get one). In short, this is another scheme to make the law-abiding pay for the crimes of criminals and/or the mentally deranged. No one should be surprised.

4) This scheme, even if it COULD work like human fingerprints, requires the ballistic "fingerprinting" of every gun in the US. Again, we have a back-door registration scheme (no surprise there); also, that couldn't possibly work, since there are tens of millions of guns that were never on 4473s (pre-1968 guns, war trophies and guns brought into the country "illegally" by the mafia, drug gangs, etc.)

5) The biggest point is that these HCI Dassholes are concentrating only on guns. What about other means of killing people? Does ANYONE recall that the largest mass murder in US history was accomplished using about $1.00 of gasoline in NYC in 1990? To refresh memories, some wacked-out imbecile was P.O.'d at his girlfriend after an argument, so he made a Molotov cocktail and tossed it into the Happy Land Social Club and thereby murdered 87 people (check out http://vikingphoenix.com/news/stn/1999/stn99005.htm for more details). Anyway, I don't recall anybody campaigning for permits to buy gasoline, registration of gasoline "arsenals," etc. Everybody knew that the gasoline didn't put itself in the bottle, carry itself to the Happy Land, stuff a rag in the bottle, open the door, light the rag and toss itself into the club. Well, guns have the same capacity to kill/murder human beings as the gasoline used in 1990 to murder 87 people - i.e. NONE. What disturbs me is that there are so many ignorant people out there that this kind of $hit spewed by HCI and the media actually is believed.

To me, the ultimate solution is education - take someone to the range who has no familiarity with guns, or is afraid of them, and teach them a thing or two. Write letters to the newspapers, etc. to show how they are ignorant (esp. about ballistic "fingerprinting") and never hesitate to make someone with whom you are discussing/arguing this issue look like the fool that they are.

End of rant.
46 posted on 10/13/2002 7:45:05 AM PDT by Ancesthntr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Thanks for the link!
47 posted on 10/13/2002 1:46:00 PM PDT by krodriguesdc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson