Evidence Disproving Evolution

myself | 10/11/02 | gore3000

[Junior]

Mea culpa.

[Youa right]

[AndrewC]

Why do you bother? We both know that the link in question was provided solely to demonstrate the weakness in the creationists' line of argumentation, by providing a counter-example of their own "guilt by association" style of propaganda -- and which was specifically labeled as such.

Why was your post pulled then? It was offensive. The proof is in the pudding.

[Condorman]

You are here.

[Junior]

I am the walrus. Koo koo kajoob.

[placemarker]

[PatrickHenry]

Freedom, reason, evolution!
Evolution = family values!
Bash the socialist dems!
God Bless America!

[Junior]

Boy, this thread died.

[gore3000]

As he pointed out, the link was not to cast aspersions on creos by association,

We know that favorite Ciceronian rhetorical gambit the 'I am not going to say that Verres was a motherless bastard, even though he was because it has nothing to do with this...'. All Patrick does is try to paint all opponents with the brush of the few who do wrong. You are not fooling anyone about Patrick's intentions or of your atheism.

[Junior]

You, dear child, try to cast aspersions on evolutionists by linking them to Hitler and Stalin; PH was simply showing you the shallowness of such a tactic. Or, contrapositively, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

[gore3000]

You, dear child, try to cast aspersions on evolutionists by linking them to Hitler and Stalin;

Christians are not the followers of pedophiles. Hitler and the Communists based their degenerate philosophies on evolution - as I and others have already abundantly shown on this thread. Big difference. Also that you join your atheist friend in broad brushing Christians in this manner, shows your own atheism.

[Junior]

Christians are not the followers of pedophiles.

However, certain Christian leaders are pedophiles.

Hitler and the Communists based their degenerate philosophies on evolution - as I and others have already abundantly shown on this thread.

And you've been wrong. Hitler based his philosophies on a combination of Theosophy (look it up) and Lutheranism. Anti-Semitism was as old as Europe. Stalin based his beliefs on Marx and Lysenko, and was most assuredly not an evolutionist.

Also that you join your atheist friend in broad brushing Christians in this manner, shows your own atheism.

I'm not broad-brushing anyone. PatrickHenry was simply pointing out the fallacious nature of the creos' guilt-by-association argument in regards to evolution. One can no more blame communism or pedophilia on Christians than one can blame Naziism on evolutionists. That you cannot grasp this simple fact does not speak well for your cognitive abilities.

[PatrickHenry]

I can't decide if this thread or the one on crop circles should win the "Greatest Waste of Bandwidth" prize.

[f.Christian]

Main Entry: tech·noc·ra·cy
Pronunciation: tek-'nä-kr&-sE
Function: noun
Date: circa 1919
: government by technicians; specifically : management of society by technical experts



Main Entry: 1ca·bal
Pronunciation: k&-'bäl, -'bal
Function: noun
Etymology: French cabale cabala, intrigue, cabal, from Medieval Latin cabbala cabala, from Late Hebrew qabbAlAh, literally, received (lore)
Date: 1614
: the artifices and intrigues of a group of persons secretly united to bring about an overturn or usurpation especially in public affairs; also : a group engaged in such artifices and intrigues
synonym see PLOT

[PatrickHenry]

Self-search list bump.

[longshadow]

Or, contrapositively, what's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

What an utterly fowl thing to say.....

;-)

[PatrickHenry]

Dead thread, last-chance, self-search bump.

[RadioAstronomer]

Not quite dead yet bump! :-)

[merak]

placemarker

[f.Christian]

dwp...

So you have proven little, except that religious fundamentalism is a continuing embarrassment to thinking conservatives.


10 posted on 10/11/2002 9:23 PM PDT by DWPittelli


fC...

You must be a liberal fundamentalist if your beliefs // life // politics is evolution ideology // dynamics ! ! !

[f.Christian]

dwp...

As you can probably tell, my point is that there is no possible creationist theory which is logically consistent and compatible with the physical evidence, with one exception: God, or the Devil with God's aquiescence, has gone out of his way to fool us into believing evolution. In which case, doesn't God want us to believe in evolution, and so isn't it a sin to be a creationist?

Finally, if you are afraid or unable to answer these questions, then why shouldn't we dismiss you out of hand as a hopelessly confused hack?


194 posted on 10/12/2002 10:08 AM PDT by DWPittelli



fC...

God isn't obligated to operate according to your dumb // backward // lame thinking - - - mind // time frame . . .

what is choking off anything smart from coming out of your collapsed brain is your big // fat // overblown over estimation of yourself - - - EGO . . .

blocking any brains // Truth from happening ! ! !


God can create an any age universe instantaneously - - -

but the rules aren't going to change much just to keep the death row losers like your self from saying . . .

God is arbitrary // 'tricky' // unfair - - - "railroaded" // "I wasn't told" // "framed" ! ! !

Everyone has sufficient evidence // warning ! ! !

[f.Christian]

dwp...

So you have proven little, except that religious fundamentalism is a continuing embarrassment to thinking conservatives.


fC...


Is the universe absolute(conservative) . . . or - - - flux // relative(liberal) ? ? ?