Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Muslims Misjudged Us
city journal ^ | Winter 2002 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 10/14/2002 4:45:22 AM PDT by dennisw

 

 

 

Why the Muslims Misjudged Us

Victor Davis Hanson

Letter S.ince September 11, we have heard mostly slander and lies about the West from radical Islamic fundamentalists in their defense of the terrorists. But the Middle Eastern mainstream—diplomats, intellectuals, and journalists—has also bombarded the American public with an array of unflattering images and texts, suggesting that the extremists’ anti-Americanism may not be an eccentricity of the ignorant but rather a representative slice of the views of millions. For example, Egyptian Nobel Prize–winning novelist Naguib Mahfouz reportedly announced from his Cairo home that America’s bombing of the Taliban was “just as despicable a crime” as the September 11 attacks—as if the terrorists’ unprovoked mass murder of civilians were the moral equivalent of selected air strikes against enemy soldiers in wartime. Americans, reluctant to answer back their Middle Eastern critics for fear of charges of “Islamophobia” or “Arab smearing,” have let such accusations go largely unchecked.

Two striking themes—one overt, one implied—characterize most Arab invective: first, there is some sort of equivalence—political, cultural, and military—between the West and the Muslim world; and second, America has been exceptionally unkind toward the Middle East. Both premises are false and reveal that the temple of anti-Americanism is supported by pillars of utter ignorance.

Few in the Middle East have a clue about the nature, origins, or history of democracy, a word that, along with its family (“constitution,” “freedom,” and “citizen”), has no history in the Arab vocabulary, or indeed any philological pedigree in any language other than Greek and Latin and their modern European offspring. Consensual government is not the norm of human politics but a rare and precious idea, not imposed or bequeathed but usually purchased with the blood of heroes and patriots, whether in classical Athens, revolutionary America, or more recently in Eastern Europe. Democracy’s lifeblood is secularism and religious tolerance, coupled with free speech and economic liberty.

Afghan tribal councils, without written constitutions, are better than tyranny, surely; but they do not make consensual government. Nor do the Palestinian parliament and advisory bodies in Kuwait. None of these faux assemblies is elected by an unbound citizenry, free to criticize (much less recall, impeach, or depose) their heads of state by legal means, or even to speak openly to journalists about the failings of their own government. Plato remarked of such superficial government-by-deliberation that even thieves divvy up the loot by give-and-take, suggesting that the human tendency to parley is natural but is not the same as the formal machinery of democratic government.

Our own cultural elites, either out of timidity or sometimes ignorance of the uniqueness of our own political institutions, seldom make such distinctions. But the differences are critical, because they lie unnoticed at the heart of the crisis in the Muslim world, and they explain our own tenuous relations with the regimes in the Gulf and the Middle East. Israel does not really know to what degree the Palestinian authorities have a real constituency, because the people of the West Bank themselves do not know either—inasmuch as they cannot debate one another on domestic television or campaign on the streets for alternate policies. Mr. Arafat assumed power by Western fiat; when he finally was allowed to hold real and periodic elections in his homeland, he simply perpetuated autocracy—as corrupt as it is brutal.

By the same token, we are surprised at the duplicity of the Gulf States in defusing internal dissent by redirecting it against Americans, forgetting that such is the way of all dictators, who, should they lose office, do not face the golden years of Jimmy Carter’s busy house-building or Bill Clinton’s self-absorbed angst. Either they dodge the mob’s bullets or scurry to a fortified compound on the French coast a day ahead of the posse. The royal family of Saudi Arabia cannot act out of principle because no principle other than force put and keeps them in power. All the official jets, snazzy embassies, and expensive press agents cannot hide that these illegitimate rulers are not in the political sense Western at all.

How sad that intellectuals of the Arab world—themselves only given freedom when they emigrate to the United States or Europe—profess support for democratic reform from Berkeley or Cambridge but secretly fear that, back home, truly free elections would usher in folk like the Iranian imams, who, in the manner of the Nazis in 1933, would thereupon destroy the very machinery that elected them. The fact is that democracy does not spring fully formed from the head of Zeus but rather is an epiphenomenon—the formal icing on a preexisting cake of egalitarianism, economic opportunity, religious tolerance, and constant self-criticism. The former cannot appear in the Muslim world until gallant men and women insist upon the latter—and therein demolish the antidemocratic and medieval forces of tribalism, authoritarian traditionalism, and Islamic fundamentalism.

How much easier for non-voters of the Arab world to vent frustration at the West, as if, in some Machiavellian plot, a democratic America, Israel, and Europe have conspired to prevent Muslims from adopting the Western invention of democracy! Democracy is hardly a Western secret to be closely guarded and kept from the mujaheddin. Islam is welcome to it, with the blessing and subsidy of the West. Yes, we must promote democracy abroad in the Muslim world; but only they, not we, can ensure its success.

The catastrophe of the Muslim world is also explicable in its failure to grasp the nature of Western success, which springs neither from luck nor resources, genes nor geography. Like third-world Marxists of the 1960s, who put blame for their own self-inflicted misery upon corporations, colonialism, and racism—anything other than the absence of real markets and a free society—the Islamic intelligentsia recognizes the Muslim world’s inferiority vis-`a-vis the West, but it then seeks to fault others for its own self-created fiasco. Government spokesmen in the Middle East should ignore the nonsense of the cultural relativists and discredited Marxists and have the courage to say that they are poor because their populations are nearly half illiterate, that their governments are not free, that their economies are not open, and that their fundamentalists impede scientific inquiry, unpopular expression, and cultural exchange.

Tragically, the immediate prospects for improvement are dismal, inasmuch as the war against terrorism has further isolated the Middle East. Travel, foreign education, and academic exchanges—the only sources of future hope for the Arab world—have screeched to a halt. All the conferences in Cairo about Western bias and media distortion cannot hide this self-inflicted catastrophe—and the growing ostracism and suspicion of Middle Easterners in the West.

But blaming the West, and Israel, for the unendurable reality is easier for millions of Muslims than admitting the truth. Billions of barrels of oil, large populations, the Suez Canal, the fertility of the Nile, Tigris, and Euphrates valleys, invaluable geopolitical locations, and a host of other natural advantages that helped create wealthy civilizations in the past now yield an excess of misery, rather than the riches of resource-poor Hong Kong or Switzerland. How could it be otherwise, when it takes bribes and decades to obtain a building permit in Cairo; when habeas corpus is a cruel joke in Baghdad; and when Saudi Arabia turns out more graduates in Islamic studies than in medicine or engineering?

To tackle illiteracy, gratuitous state-sanctioned killing, and the economic sclerosis that comes from corruption and state control would require the courage and self-examination of Eastern Europe, Russia, South America, even of China. Instead, wedded to the old bromides that the West causes their misery, that fundamentalist Islam and crackpot mullahs have had no role in their disasters, that the subjugation of women is a “different” rather than a foul (and economically foolish) custom, Muslim intellectuals have railed these past few months about the creation of Israel half a century ago, and they have sat either silent or amused while the mob in their streets chants in praise of a mass murderer. Meanwhile millions of Muslims tragically stay sick and hungry in silence.

Has the Muslim world gone mad in its threats and ultimatums? Throughout this war, Muslims have saturated us with overt and with insidious warnings. If America retaliated to the mass murder of its citizens, the Arab world would turn on us; if we bombed during Ramadan, we would incur lasting hatred; if we continued in our mission to avenge our dead, not an American would be safe in the Middle East. More disturbing even than the screaming street demonstrations have been the polite admonitions of corrupt grandees like Crown Prince Abdallah of Saudi Arabia or editor Abdul Rahman al Rashed of Saudi Arabia’s state-owned Al Sharq al Awsat. Don’t they see the impotence and absurdity of their veiled threats, backed neither by military force nor cultural dynamism? Don’t they realize that nothing is more fatal to the security of a state than the divide between what it threatens and what it can deliver?

There is an abyss between such rhetoric and the world we actually live in, an abyss called power. Out of politeness, we needn’t crow over the relative military capability of 1 billion Muslims and 300 million Americans; but we should remember that the lethal, 2,500-year Western way of war is the reflection of very different ideas about personal freedom, civic militarism, individuality on the battlefield, military technology, logistics, decisive battle, group discipline, civilian audit, and the dissemination and proliferation of knowledge.

Values and traditions—not guns, germs, and steel—explain why a tiny Greece of 50,000 square miles crushed a Persia 20 times larger; why Rome, not Carthage, created world government; why Cortés was in Tenochtitl`an, and Montezuma not in Barcelona; why gunpowder in its home in China was a pastime for the elite while, when stolen and brought to Europe, it became a deadly and ever evolving weapon of the masses. Even at the nadir of Western power in the medieval ages, a Europe divided by religion and fragmented into feudal states could still send thousands of thugs into the Holy Land, while a supposedly ascendant Islam had neither the ships nor the skill nor the logistics to wage jihad in Scotland or Brittany. Much is made of 500 years of Ottoman dominance over a feuding Orthodox, Christian, and Protestant West; but the sultans were powerful largely to the degree that they crafted alliances with a distrustful France and the warring Italian city-states, copied the Arsenal at Venice, turned out replicas of Italian and German cannon, and moved their capital to European Constantinople. Moreover, their “dominance” amounted only to a rough naval parity with the West on the old Roman Mediterranean; they never came close   to the conquest of the heart of Western Europe.

Europeans, not Ottomans, colonized central and southern Africa, Asia and the Pacific, and the Americas—and not merely because of their Atlantic ports or ocean ships but rather because of their long-standing attitudes and traditions about scientific inquiry, secular thought, free markets, and individual ingenuity and spontaneity. To be sure, military power is not a referendum on morality—Pizarro’s record in Peru makes as grim reading as the Germans’ in central Africa; it is, rather, a reflection of the amoral dynamism that fuels ships and soldiers.

We are militarily strong, and the Arab world abjectly weak, not because of greater courage, superior numbers, higher IQs, more ores, or better weather, but because of our culture. When it comes to war, 1 billion people and the world’s oil are not nearly as valuable military assets as MIT, West Point, the U.S. House of Representatives, C-Span, Bill O’Riley, and the G.I. Bill. Between Xerxes on his peacock throne overlooking Salamis and Saddam on his balcony reviewing his troops, between the Greeks arguing and debating before they rowed out with Themistocles and the Americans haranguing one another on the eve of the Gulf War, lies a 2,500-year cultural tradition that explains why the rest of the world copies its weapons, uniforms, and military organization from us, not vice versa.

Many Middle Easterners have performed a great media charade throughout this war. They publish newspapers and televise the news, and thereby give the appearance of being modern and Western. But their reporters and anchormen are by no means journalists by Western standards of free and truthful inquiry. Whereas CNN makes a point of talking to the victims of collateral damage in Kabul, al-Jazeera would never interview the mothers of Israeli teenagers blown apart by Palestinian bombs. Nor does any Egyptian or Syrian television station welcome freewheeling debates or Meet the Press–style talk shows permitting criticism of the government or the national religion. Instead, they quibble over their own degrees of anti-Americanism and obfuscate the internal contradictions of Islam. The chief dailies in Algiers, Teheran, and Kuwait City look like Pravda of old. The entire Islamic media is a simulacrum of the West, lacking the life-giving spirit of debate and self-criticism.

As a result, when Americans see a cavalcade of talking Middle Eastern heads nod and blurt out the party line—that Israel is evil, that the United States is naïve and misled, that Muslims are victims, that the West may soon have to reckon with Islamic anger—they assume the talk is orchestrated and therefore worth listening to only for what it teaches about how authoritarian governments can coerce and corrupt journalists and intellectuals.

A novelist who writes whatever he pleases anywhere in the Muslim world is more likely to receive a fatwa and a mob at his courtyard than a prize for literary courage, as Naguib Mahfouz and Salman Rushdie have learned. No wonder a code of silence pervades the Islamic world. No wonder, too, that Islam is far more ignorant of us than we of it. And no wonder that the Muslims haven’t a clue that, while their current furor is scripted, whipped up, and mercurial, ours is far deeper and more lasting.

Every Western intellectual knows Edward Said’s much-hyped theory of “Orientalism,” a purely mythical construct of how Western bias has misunderstood and distorted the Eastern “Other.” In truth, the real problem is “Westernism”—the fatally erroneous idea in the Middle East that its propaganda-spewing Potemkin television stations give it a genuine understanding of the nature of America, an understanding Middle Easterners believe is deepened by the presence in their midst of a few McDonald’s franchises and hired U.S. public-relations firms. That error—which mistakes ignorance for insight—helps explain why Usama bin Ladin so grossly miscalculated the devastating magnitude of our response to September 11. In reality, the most parochial American knows more about the repressive nature of the Gulf States than the most sophisticated and well-traveled sheikh understands about the cultural underpinnings of this country, including the freedom of speech and inquiry that is missing in the Islamic press.

Millions in the Middle East are obsessed with Israel, whether they live in sight of Tel Aviv or thousands of miles away. Their fury doesn’t spring solely from genuine dismay over the hundreds of Muslims Israel has killed on the West Bank; after all, Saddam Hussein butchered hundreds of thousands of Shiites, Kurds, and Iranians, while few in Cairo or Damascus said a word. Syria’s Assad liquidated perhaps 20,000 in sight of Israel, without a single demonstration in any Arab capital. The murder of some 100,000 Muslims in Algeria and 40,000 in Chechnya in the last decade provoked few intellectuals in the Middle East to call for a pan-Islamic protest. Clearly, the anger derives not from the tragic tally of the fallen but from Islamic rage that Israelis have defeated Muslims on the battlefield repeatedly, decisively, at will, and without modesty.

If Israel were not so successful, free, and haughty—if it were beleaguered and tottering on the verge of ruin—perhaps it would be tolerated. But in a sea of totalitarianism and government-induced poverty, a relatively successful economy and a stable culture arising out of scrub and desert clearly irks its less successful neighbors. Envy, as the historian Thucydides reminds us, is a powerful emotion and has caused not a few wars.

If Israel did not exist, the Arab world, in its current fit of denial, would have to invent something like it to vent its frustrations. That is not to say there may not be legitimate concerns in the struggle over Palestine, but merely that for millions of Muslims the fight over such small real estate stems from a deep psychological wound. It isn’t about lebensraum or some actual physical threat. Israel is a constant reminder that it is a nation’s culture—not its geography or size or magnitude of its oil reserves—that determines its wealth or freedom. For the Middle East to make peace with Israel would be to declare war on itself, to admit that that its own fundamental way of doing business—not the Jews—makes it poor, sick, and weak.

Throughout the Muslim world, myth and ignorance surround U.S. foreign policy toward the Middle East. Yes, we give Israel aid, but less than the combined billions that go to the Palestinians and to Egypt, Jordan, and other Muslim countries. And it is one thing to subsidize a democratic and constitutional (if cantankerous) ally but quite another to pay for slander from theocratic or autocratic enemies. Though Israel has its fair share of fundamentalists and fanatics, the country is not the creation of clerics or strongmen but of European émigrés, who committed Israel from the start to democracy, free speech, and abundant self-critique.

Far from egging on Israel, the United States actually restrains the Israeli military, whose organization and discipline, along with the sophisticated Israeli arms industry, make it quite capable of annihilating nearly all its bellicose neighbors without American aid. Should the United States withdraw from active participation in the Middle East and let the contestants settle their differences on the battlefield, Israel, not the Arab world, would win. The military record of four previous conflicts does not lie. Arafat should remember who saved him in Lebanon; it was no power in the Middle East that brokered his exodus and parted the waves of Israeli planes and tanks for his safe passage to the desert.

The Muslim world suffers from political amnesia, we now have learned, and so has forgotten not only Arafat’s resurrection but also American help to beleaguered Afghanis, terrified Kuwaitis, helpless Kurds and Shiites, starving Somalis, and defenseless Bosnians—direct intervention that has cost the United States much more treasure and lives than mere economic aid for Israel ever did. They forget; but we remember the Palestinians cheering in Nablus hours after thousands of our innocents were incinerated in New York, the hagiographic posters of a mass murderer in the streets of Muslim capitals, and the smug remonstrations of Saudi prince Alwaleed to Mayor Giuliani at Ground Zero.

Saudi Arabian and Kuwaiti Westernized elites find psychological comfort in their people’s anti-American rhetoric, not out of real grievance but perhaps as reassurance that their own appetite for all things Western doesn’t constitute rejection of their medieval religion or their thirteenth-century caliphate. Their apologists in the United States dissemble when they argue that these Gulf sheikhs are forced to master a doublespeak for foreign consumption, or that they are better than the frightening alternative, or that they are victims of unfair American anger that is ignorant of Wahhabi custom. In their present relationship with the terrorists, these old-fashioned autocrats are neutrals only in the sense that they now play the cagier role of Franco’s Spain to Hitler’s Germany. They aid and abet our enemies, but never overtly. If the United States prevails, the Saudis can proclaim that they were always with us; should we lose a shooting war with the terrorists, the princes can swear that their prior neutrality really constituted allegiance to radical Islam all along.

In matters of East-West relations, immigration has always been a one-way phenomenon. Thousands flocked to Athens and Rome; few left for Parthia or Numidia unless to colonize or exploit. People sneak into South, not North, Korea—in the same manner that few from Hong Kong once braved gunfire to reach Peking (unless to invest and profit). Few Israeli laborers are going to the West Bank to seek construction jobs. In this vein is the Muslim world’s longing for the very soil of America. Even in the crucible of war, we have discovered that our worst critics love us in the concrete as much as they hate us in the abstract.

For all the frothing, it seems that millions of our purported enemies wish to visit, study, or (better yet) live in the United States—and this is true not just of Westernized professors or globe-trotting tycoons but of hijackers, terrorists, the children of the Taliban, the offspring of Iranian mullahs, and the spoiled teenage brats of our Gulf critics. The terrorists visited lap dancers, took out frequent-flier miles, spent hours on the Internet, had cell phones strapped to their hips, and hobnobbed in Las Vegas—parasitic on a culture not their own, fascinated with toys they could not make, and always ashamed that their lusts grew more than they could be satisfied. Until September 11, their ilk had been like fleas on a lazy, plump dog, gnashing their tiny proboscises to gain bloody nourishment or inflict small welts on a distracted host who found them not worth the scratch.

This dual loathing and attraction for things Western is characteristic of the highest echelon of the terrorists themselves, often Western-educated, English-speaking, and hardly poor. Emblematic is the evil genius of al-Qaida, the sinister Dr. al-Zawahiri: he grew up in Cairo affluence, his family enmeshed in all the Westernized institutions of Egypt.

Americans find this Middle Eastern cultural schizophrenia maddening, especially in its inability to fathom that all the things that Muslim visitors profess to hate—equality of the sexes, cultural freedom, religious tolerance, egalitarianism, free speech, and secular rationalism—are precisely what give us the material things that they want in the first place. CDs and sexy bare midriffs are the fruits of a society that values freedom, unchecked inquiry, and individual expression more than the dictates of state or church; wild freedom and wild materialism are part of the American character. So bewildered Americans now ask themselves: Why do so many of these anti-Americans, who profess hatred of the West and reverence for the purity of an energized Islam or a fiery Palestine, enroll in Chico State or UCLA instead of madrassas in Pakistan or military academies in Iraq?

The embarrassing answer would explain nearly everything, from bin Ladin to the intifada. Dads and moms who watch al-Jazeera and scream in the street at the Great Satan really would prefer that their children have dollars, an annual CAT scan, a good lawyer, air conditioning, and Levis in American hell than be without toilet paper, suffer from intestinal parasites, deal with the secret police, and squint with uncorrected vision in the Islamic paradise of Cairo, Teheran, and Gaza. Such a fundamental and intolerable paradox in the very core of a man’s heart—multiplied millions of times over—is not a healthy thing either for them or for us, as we have learned since September 11.

Most Americans recognize and honor the past achievements of Islamic civilization and the contribution of Middle-Eastern immigrants to the United States and Europe, as well as the traditional hospitality shown visitors to the Muslim world. And so we have long shown patience with those who hate us, and more curiosity than real anger.

But that was then, and this is now. A two-kiloton explosion that incinerated thousands of our citizens—planned by Middle Easterners with the indirect financial support of purportedly allied governments, the applause of millions, and the snickering and smiles of millions more—has had an effect that grows not wanes.

So a neighborly bit of advice for our Islamic friends and their spokesmen abroad: topple your pillars of ignorance and the edifice of your anti-Americanism. Try to seek difficult answers from within to even more difficult questions without. Do not blame others for problems that are largely self-created or seek solutions over here when your answers are mostly at home. Please, think hard about what you are saying and writing about the deaths of thousands of Americans and your relationship with the United States. America has been a friend more often than not to you. But now you are on the verge of turning its people—who create, not follow, government—into an enemy: a very angry and powerful enemy that may be yours for a long, long time to come.

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: clashofcivilizatio; hanson; muslims; terror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

1 posted on 10/14/2002 4:45:22 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw
bump
2 posted on 10/14/2002 4:52:13 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
BTTT for a very good read - thanks for posting this.
3 posted on 10/14/2002 5:03:32 AM PDT by VaMarVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Finally, a thoughtful essay on the subject.

Rather long, but reading even every fourth paragraph is worthwhile.
4 posted on 10/14/2002 5:11:20 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
So a neighborly bit of advice for our Democrat Party friends and their willing accomplices in the press: topple your pillars of ignorance and the edifice of your anti-Americanism. Try to seek difficult answers from within to even more difficult questions without. Do not blame others for problems that are largely self-created or seek solutions from government when your answers are mostly within your reach. Please, think hard about what you are saying and writing about the deaths of thousands of Americans and your relationship with the people of the United States. The American people have elected you to power more often than not. But now you are on the verge of turning its people—who create, not follow, government—into an enemy: a very angry and powerful enemy that may be yours for a long, long time to come.
5 posted on 10/14/2002 5:14:47 AM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
WOW! Victor Davis Hanson

EXCELLENT READ!!!!

6 posted on 10/14/2002 5:15:46 AM PDT by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Travis McGee
Thoughtful but sobering reading.
7 posted on 10/14/2002 5:17:35 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
But for terrorism, the Muslims don't matter. The way to reduce terrorism is to kill the terrorisms and to make the heads of Arab governments fear us more than they fear the terrorists or their own street. Appeasement didn't work.
8 posted on 10/14/2002 5:18:20 AM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
This was written in Febuary 2002 and posted back then. I re-posted it because it is still very good and will be for a long time.
9 posted on 10/14/2002 5:21:17 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
As the Australians mourn their dead in the Bali nightclub bombing, it becomes quite clear that this is nothing less than a war between the predominant voices of Islam and Western Civilization.

This is the third great World War, better get ready for it. And when all the voices speaking for Islam seem to be telling you that their goal is to overthrow Western Civilization and supplant it with an Islamic dictatorship, we should listen to them. We need to get out of denial and recognize that Islam, as an institution, is the enemy, with a possible few exceptions.

The "Religion of Peace" Muslims have had over a year to make themselves known, I have seen very few to this date. I will consider them all my mortal enemies until they demonstrate otherwise.

10 posted on 10/14/2002 5:36:13 AM PDT by Kenton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"Most Americans recognize and honor the past achievements of Islamic civilization and the contribution of Middle-Eastern immigrants to the United States and Europe..."

I must disagree. The war, death, and destruction that Islam perpetrates upon the "Jews, Christians, and Infidels" far outweighs any contributions it has made. We can adduce much evidence that Islam is more of a threat than it is anything else.
11 posted on 10/14/2002 5:40:20 AM PDT by Neever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
We are militarily strong, and the Arab world abjectly weak, not because of greater courage, superior numbers, higher IQs, more ores, or better weather, but because of our culture. When it comes to war, 1 billion people and the world’s oil are not nearly as valuable military assets as MIT, West Point, the U.S. House of Representatives, C-Span, Bill O’Riley, and the G.I. Bill.

Yup. That about sums it up. Thanks for the great repost. I am bookmarking it this time.

12 posted on 10/14/2002 5:41:32 AM PDT by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thanks for the great article. I have sent it to many of my friends. Great reading.
13 posted on 10/14/2002 5:41:49 AM PDT by PLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Bump for great article!

14 posted on 10/14/2002 5:43:47 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
BTTT
15 posted on 10/14/2002 5:44:17 AM PDT by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The author has made some mistakes.

It is limited government, not democracy, that brought freedom to the Western World.

Freedom, not democracy, brought prosperity to the Western World.

Limited government, not egalitarianism, makes democracy work in the Western World.

The Islamic fundamentalist doesn't not covet what the Western World has wrought. He objects to having his faith shown to be flawed by the successes of the West while his people live out their lives in Medieval fashion. His thinking is that his people live as they should and the high living standards of the West are an Abomination.

This thinking is also the reason why Israel, so successful in the heart of the beast, denying them claim that the Western World is successful by it's placement across the world's resources.

I believe this thinking also reveals the consistency in the demonstrated lusts of the Arab in America, all the while hating us.

The Islamic fundamentalists' hatred for America runs deeper than mere jealousy. It's founded on the complete incompatibility of their belief system and Western success, and prosperity.

They do not want what we have, they want to destroy us to deny proof of the flaws in their belief system.
16 posted on 10/14/2002 5:49:42 AM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
the temple of anti-Americanism is supported by pillars of utter ignorance.

There is indeed a streak of ignorance in the Arab anti-Americanism, but it is no more "the pillar" or the main cause of this ugly feature than "poverty" or "Zionist oppression" are. The guys have their agenda, and, they reckon, in its pursuit all the means are good. And they do know that America is the last redoubt in defence of the free world, so their hatred is based on knowledge, not on ignorance.

As to the Western anti-Americanism, there is no ignorance in it whatsoever, since Leftie academia and liberal intelligentsia are the main culprits.

Why, a former Australian diplomat Bruce Heigh (spelling?) told this morning on the Aussie Prime TV that if Americans didn't support Israel the terrorist act in Bali wouldn't happen! Surely a diplomat would know that the goal of the Indonesian Muslims is to create an Islamic super state incorporating the Phillippines, Malaysia, Singapore and parts of Thailand... and even if Israel never existed at all it wouldn't change anything for the Indonesian Muslims.

17 posted on 10/14/2002 5:49:42 AM PDT by Neophyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
One of the best articles I've read here in a good while. Excellent find.
18 posted on 10/14/2002 6:07:54 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenton
... it becomes quite clear that this is nothing less than a war between the predominant voices of Islam and Western Civilization.

Psalm 2 comes to mind. Even successful conspiracies against the God of the Bible have expiration dates. Communism flared up, engulfed 1/3 of the world, than suddenly died within a single human lifespan. Islam has been hostile to humanity for a longer period of time, but its days are numbered.

Finally, secular humanism will have its date with destiny.

19 posted on 10/14/2002 6:09:08 AM PDT by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
"So a neighborly bit of advice for our Democrat Party friends..."

Excellent essay. And I was thinking the same thing as you so aptly transposed this toward the political party of the liberal elitist. Very well transposed...

Kudos SubMareener

And it is so frighteningly true of the final statement that they - anti-Americans are "turning its people—who create, not follow, government—into an enemy: a very angry and powerful enemy"

Like the saying in some recent movie, "May God have mercy on your souls, for we will not"

20 posted on 10/14/2002 6:10:44 AM PDT by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thank you for re-posting it. Excellent read. All of it.
21 posted on 10/14/2002 6:12:33 AM PDT by el_texicano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte
As to the Western anti-Americanism, there is no ignorance in it whatsoever, since Leftie academia and liberal intelligentsia are the main culprits.



These are the same folks who never admitted to faults with a Communistic world view. Anti-American is their Keyword.
22 posted on 10/14/2002 6:16:27 AM PDT by maica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
<< .... think hard about what you are saying and writing about the deaths of thousands of Americans and your relationship with the United States. America has been a friend .... to you. But now you [Have turned Our] people—who create, not follow, government—into an enemy.

A very angry and powerful enemy that [WILL] be yours for a long, long time to come.
23 posted on 10/14/2002 6:31:40 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Dads and moms who watch al-Jazeera and scream in the street at the Great Satan really would prefer that their children have dollars, an annual CAT scan, a good lawyer, air conditioning, and Levis in American hell than be without toilet paper, suffer from intestinal parasites, deal with the secret police, and squint with uncorrected vision in the Islamic paradise of Cairo, Teheran, and Gaza.

This is why we will win in the end. Even our enemies recognize our moral superiority.

Thanks for the great post from an excellent writer.

24 posted on 10/14/2002 6:41:36 AM PDT by jalisco555
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Excellent.
25 posted on 10/14/2002 6:52:40 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
I agree with your critiques of what is otherwise an extrordinarily great piece of thinking and writing.

You can edit me anytime! ;-)

EV
26 posted on 10/14/2002 6:54:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Whereas CNN makes a point of talking to the victims of collateral damage in Kabul, al-Jazeera would never interview the mothers of Israeli teenagers blown apart by Palestinian bombs. Nor does any Egyptian or Syrian television station welcome freewheeling debates or Meet the Press–style talk shows permitting consisting of criticism of the government or the national religion and of most of the audience (i.e., religious people . . . ).
Dale Carnegie's rules are, first, not to criticize, condemn, or complain and, second, to give honest, sincere appreciation. That is effective personal relations, and the reason effective personal relations aren't as commonplace as we would like is that that is hard work.

In my observation, journalism consists primarily of people trying to attract attention by doing just the opposite--and calling that "objectivity" . . . in truth defining yourself as being objective is the teltale sign of the ideologue.


27 posted on 10/14/2002 7:03:45 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
I would quibble with the erudite and eloquent Mr. Hanson on one other point as well: Be not too sure that ignorance, rather than malevolence, is at the heart of the Middle Eastern Muslims' slanders of the West, and particularly those of America. They're losing their brightest and best to us, in a steady stream. Their emigres are earning (by Middle Eastern standards) fortunes they can't commandeer, are associating with "infidels" in relative harmony, and are raising their children in a vein closer to that of liberal Christian America than to that of Wahhabi-dominated Saudi Arabia or Shi'a Iran. Their emigres are making them look bad.

If there's one thing a man who claims to have a purchase on Absolute Truth doesn't want, it's to look like an ineffectual, unwashed moron. He won't like you for it.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

28 posted on 10/14/2002 7:05:22 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Neophyte
As to the Western anti-Americanism, there is no ignorance in it whatsoever, since Leftie academia and liberal intelligentsia are the main culprits
. . . and leftist intellectuals are ignorant of nothing.

</sarcasm>

29 posted on 10/14/2002 7:08:46 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: *Clash of Civilizatio
Indexing.
30 posted on 10/14/2002 7:08:46 AM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
"The Islamic fundamentalists' hatred for America runs deeper than mere jealousy. It's founded on the complete incompatibility of their belief system and Western success, and prosperity.

They do not want what we have, they want to destroy us to deny proof of the flaws in their belief system"

You would be about the first person I have seen that really gets it. Socialist/liberals world wide are so crazy as to think they can negotiate with people like this. It's beyond their mental capacity to grasp that they have finally come nose to nose with the ultimate in diversity. An utterly alien deadly group think, known as Islam, that flies in the face of what the West understands as "human nature".

31 posted on 10/14/2002 7:14:57 AM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Thanks for the repost. Bookmarked!
32 posted on 10/14/2002 7:21:51 AM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Worth reading every word.
33 posted on 10/14/2002 7:40:46 AM PDT by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dutchgirl
Christian Infadel Bump!!
34 posted on 10/14/2002 8:08:39 AM PDT by Puppage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
ping
35 posted on 10/14/2002 8:24:27 AM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
An utterly alien deadly group think, known as Islam, that flies in the face of what the West understands as "human nature"

The "institutionalization of evil" might be the only parallel the western world can comprehend.

36 posted on 10/14/2002 8:29:29 AM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: windcliff
VDH...always an investment.
37 posted on 10/14/2002 8:52:34 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
It is limited government, not democracy, that brought freedom to the Western World.
Freedom, not democracy, brought prosperity to the Western World.
Limited government, not egalitarianism, makes democracy work in the Western World.

Excellent insights, Maelstrom. To improve on Victor D. Hanson...that is quite an accomplishment!

38 posted on 10/14/2002 8:56:49 AM PDT by TonyRo76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Very interesting article. I particularly appreciated the section: Values and traditions—not guns, germs, and steel—explain why a tiny Greece of 50,000 square miles crushed a Persia 20 times larger... Here, Hanson makes clear what divides our views and politics are not the result of accidents of geography (as Jared Diamond hypothesizes in Guns, Germs, and Steel), but result from the underlying culture of the people. (The left hates this argument because they believe holding cultures responsible for backwardness is racist; there must be some "objective," external-factor explanation.)

Second, I would like to agree with Maelstrom's critique (#16). The decay we observe in the West arises from the growth of government beyond that which is most desirable for the well-being of a free people. Indeed, a "modern" form of barbarism has grown in the soil of the West's relative political/economic freedom. That barbaric ideology/movement is socialism. It shares many of the same characteristics of fanatic Islam. And, in the long run, represents a much greater danger to our culture than does Islam.

39 posted on 10/14/2002 10:33:47 AM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
BTTT
40 posted on 10/14/2002 10:36:35 AM PDT by EdReform
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Great analysis! Well said.
41 posted on 10/14/2002 10:59:47 AM PDT by M. T. Cicero II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Brilliant insights. I completely agree with your comments.
42 posted on 10/14/2002 11:10:33 AM PDT by fatidic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
No wonder, too, that Islam is far more ignorant of us than we of it. And no wonder that the Muslims haven't a clue that, while their current furor is scripted, whipped up, and mercurial, ours is far deeper and more lasting.

Thanks for this thread. It's an excellent read and I'll bookmark and finish reading it later. I'll also pass it around.

43 posted on 10/14/2002 11:24:00 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
The Islamic fundamentalist doesn't not covet what the Western World has wrought. He objects to having his faith shown to be flawed by the successes of the West while his people live out their lives in Medieval fashion. His thinking is that his people live as they should and the high living standards of the West are an Abomination.

If this is true then I detect a bit of hypocrisy in those who visit America, when out from under the oppressive restrictions of Islamic fundamentalism, have no problem indulging in all America has to offer.

44 posted on 10/14/2002 4:21:44 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
They're on Jihad...

...anything goes when on Jihad.

Wrap them in pork before burying them...it should help to dissuade the living.
45 posted on 10/14/2002 4:26:00 PM PDT by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
Just to carry your thought a little further, there is no doubt the west will win this war. But, I think we have to be prepared to use different tactics. The tactic of waging war during their religious festivals (rama-dama-ding-dong for example) should be adopted, not avoided. We should let them know that further attacks would put their 'holy' cities at great risk, maybe during the 'haj'. These people mock our civility and only understand strength.

In fact, this might be WW III. We should treat it as such. All bets are off and so are the gloves. When provoked the west wages war differently than these 13th century barbarians.

46 posted on 10/14/2002 5:08:17 PM PDT by Former Proud Canadian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Excellent read, although "Occidentalism" would be a better construct that Westernism, in comparison to Orientalism.
47 posted on 10/14/2002 6:38:09 PM PDT by rmlew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservatism_IS_compassion
. . . and leftist intellectuals are ignorant of nothing.

In a way... even your pet dog stealing a steak knows it's guilty.

48 posted on 10/14/2002 7:05:42 PM PDT by Neophyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; COB1; humblegunner; Flyer; dix; antivenom; bobbyd; eastforker; iamright; PetroniDE; ...
Looks like more good stuff!!


Stay safe; stay armed.


49 posted on 10/14/2002 7:14:46 PM PDT by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
But now you [Have turned Our] people — who create, not follow, government — into an enemy.

Yes, that's where I invest my hopes. Let's hope that peoples of the free world will wake up and create governments ready to acknowledge that it's not possible to counterfight Musli terrorism on the basis of our humanistic principles.

Only if we respond in kind and with hundredfold force shall the Islamics stop the carnage.

Bali wouldn't happen if in response to 9/11 Medina seased to exist.

Muslims whine about collateral damage in Afghanistan only for the sake of Western media, in the reality they don't give a damn.

Look how they are battling against the existence of Israel... to the last Palestinian.

50 posted on 10/14/2002 7:23:52 PM PDT by Neophyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson