Skip to comments.
What are your kids learning? {COMMUNISM!!}
World Net Daily ^
| October 19, 2002
| Henry Lamb
Posted on 10/19/2002 7:09:57 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
They are, however, finding refuge in the nation's private schools. On with the revolution!
Guys,
YES!!!!!! People ARE becoming aware. Peace and love, George.
To: Carry_Okie; *"NWO"; *"Free" Trade; *Education News; *Geopolitics; *gov_watch; *Enviralists; ...
Guys, GO HENRY!! Peace and love, George.
Comment #3 Removed by Moderator
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Home schooling and private schools may be the revolution that collapses this public brainwashing system. De-programmed my kids 9 years ago!!!
Rescued my children from the public school system, while they still had a chance.
YOU ALL SHOULD!!!
What is more important, 3 new cars, designer clothes, and fine dining, or "training up your child in the way they should go"?
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
When did environmental concerns become "Communism"? Protecting the environment is not in itself "communist". The communist part is that Enviromentalism has become the cover for implimenting various provisions of the communist plank/gameplan.
#1 is the taking of privatly owned land, due to some alleged enviromental concern, be it a ferry shrimp or spotted owl, or ancient plantlife.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
Most states have a "proficency" test (by any other name...) required to gradumuate high skool. Your local library probably has a "sample" test available, I was browsing one day and glanced over a copy.
Communism is invariably portrayed as a governmental system that provides equal distribution of goods and services.
They make it sound rather benign.
6
posted on
10/19/2002 7:41:10 AM PDT
by
fone
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
Yes, and they (the communists) learned how they could subvert governmental process by using environmentalism because the people have been so brainwashed that they react in a reflexive way every time the environment is mentioned.
Here is a quote for you :
In 1989 Gorbachev was quoted speaking to the Politburo saying the following " In October 1917 we parted with the old world rejecting it once and for all. We are moving toward a new world, the world of communism. We shall never turn off that road." He also said "Gentlemen, comrades, do not be concerned about all you hear about glasnost and perestroika and democracy in the coming years. These are primarily for outward consumption. There will be no significant change within the Soviet Union, other than for cosmetic purposes. Our aim is to disarm the Americans and let them fall asleep." During 1989 when the Berlin wall came down he proclaimed " I am a convinced Communist. For some this may be a fantasy but for me it is my main goal"
Gorbachev's blueprint for the future is manipulating the world's people into accepting a one world government under the pretense of saving the environment. He has created a global Foundation called Green Cross which has as it's magna carta " The Earth Charter" which he hopes will rival the Ten Commandments. He is helping to initiate a complete restructuring of our economy,our political system and also our religious views. He has also been instumental in the scaling back of our armed forces while at the same time increasing the presence of foreign troops on our soil.
http://www.rense.com/general12/gobie.htm
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
"Environmental" concerns are the new and improved, revamped, repackaged and polished up version of communistic/socialistic thought, since the needs of human beings is trumped by the needs of the brown bellied sand flea (endangered). Boycott fast food? What sort of rubbish is that? And to your question if the matter needs more consideration, the answer is a resounding "NO". Now go back to your redwood hot tub, fire up a big fatty and think about another way to saddle the human race with more societal guilt inducing non-issues. As for the devastion caused by Three Gorges, do you live on the banks of the Yangzee? I didn't think so.
8
posted on
10/19/2002 7:41:47 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
1.Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.
2.A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3.Abolition of all right of inheritance.
4.Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5.Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6.Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state.
7.Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8.Equal obligation of all to work.
9.Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of child factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
...devastation that will be caused by future dam projects in China. What's wrong with that?
Hank
To: Clovis_Skeptic
post#9 I forgot to mention are the 10 planks of Communism by Karl Marx
To: Hank Kerchief
I think the problem is that it's done by a dictatorship in the best interests of the fascist corporate masters with no regard for the people or lives in the way of the dam. China ain't exactly free.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
The federal government is increasingly running our schools and is doing so in a manner that is inconsistent with our being a free country.
The Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution says education is a state and local prerogative.
13
posted on
10/19/2002 8:04:14 AM PDT
by
shetlan
To: Black Agnes
for your ping list
14
posted on
10/19/2002 8:06:04 AM PDT
by
Cacique
To: Clovis_Skeptic
Really??? I thought they were the positions of the democRATic party. Couldn't tell the difference.
To: Black Agnes
I think the problem is that it's done by a dictatorship in the best interests of the fascist corporate masters with no regard for the people or lives in the way of the dam. China ain't exactly free. Of course. I was intentionally panning that ignorance that does not distinguish between what oppressive governments do and what free enterprise does.
Hank
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
My friend, you have fallen victim to their spin.
There are many good references available that will get you past tha BS on "Global Warming".
The most neutral of the references posted here calls attention to the incompetence of our current super-computer technology to correctly measure the atmosphere and make reasonable projections.
Just follow your own curiousity and check out the facts. The media does its best to misguide us and it's easy to just fall in line and believe the spin, but there are many good articles on the subject posted on this forum that can give you a wider view.
To: George Frm Br00klyn Park
I thought it was all about self esteem.
To: Elisha_Ben_Abuya
Its da turd way mon...gotta read your Rifkin
To: Free the USA; Carry_Okie; 2Jedismom; 2sheep; 4Freedom; Aliska; Alabama_Wild_Man; Aquinasfan; ...
Henry Lamb ping!
20
posted on
10/19/2002 8:33:30 AM PDT
by
madfly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-93 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson