Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This was released tonight for the morning political talk shows. It will be rereleased Monday morning to the media. Some people here on FR added comments in support of the previous release, but I can tell you that until now, only a handful of people knew anything about this. Details of the system are not being disclosed.
1 posted on 10/19/2002 6:37:58 PM PDT by 1stFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 1stFreedom
High Tech is wonderful.

But, actually, for now I would be satisfied if people just had to show a driver's license (or government ID) to be allowed to vote. Liberals think that showing ID is the equivilent of a $1000 poll tax.

2 posted on 10/19/2002 6:44:11 PM PDT by 07055
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
Glory, glory, hallelujah!
3 posted on 10/19/2002 6:49:07 PM PDT by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
Faceprints -
that will also get Matt Drudge going.
4 posted on 10/19/2002 6:51:57 PM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
In South Dakota, several hundred requests from Democrats for absentee ballots were mailed in to the registrar in a single envelope.

Too f***n cheap to spend for separate envelope postage!

5 posted on 10/19/2002 6:53:05 PM PDT by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
"Thompson said “I can tell you that we are going to use it in New Jersey, Minnesota, Missouri, South Dakota, Florida, and possibly Wisconsin.”

Good! Here in NJ, I would like to see this IPOL, and cameras, and fingerprinting, and handwriting analysis, and photo ID's, and a Bible on hand to swear on.

6 posted on 10/19/2002 6:53:11 PM PDT by Exit148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
I am still a little skeptical of the effort if it is funded by well-heeled Democrats, particularly if they are doing a "See, OUR victories are honest, honest!" This high-tech stuff is capable of being manipulated both ways. I would be happy if the DOJ was there also, good Republican nominees. Remember, it was the "angry mobs" of FReepers who kept the Dems from stealing Florida when they tried to take the effort into the back room.
7 posted on 10/19/2002 7:04:32 PM PDT by alwaysconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
The most surprising aspect of this group is that over half of the $1.6 million dollar budget the group has to work with comes from a handful of wealthy Democrats. They are intent on proving that the Republican accusations of voter fraud are baseless.

Don't trust it already. Any more ideas?

13 posted on 10/19/2002 8:22:14 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
Something smells here. If the Rats(perps of almost all voter fraud) are funding it, then it is some sort of smoke cover for them. There will be massive votor fraud, and they will find a couple of direlct REPs, and pay them to vote twice, and say "see, the Republicans do it too".

However it may backfire, if thier tapes are supeoned in any legal action that might insue. We just need a few people with phot graphic memories stationed at the most likley poling areas.
16 posted on 10/19/2002 9:27:05 PM PDT by stubernx98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
I hope this gets well publicised. Just the fear of being detected may deter many!
17 posted on 10/19/2002 10:15:44 PM PDT by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
We need to start putting people in jail for vote fraud. They are destroying our Constitution.
18 posted on 10/19/2002 11:34:04 PM PDT by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom

Torricelli-Lautenberg-DNC Two-Step Not 1st Foray into Virtual Reality

NJ Senators Tested "RUNet 2000," DNC Switcheroo Scheme Precursor, in 1998


21 posted on 10/20/2002 2:18:41 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom

SENATORS FOR VOTE FRAUD

By ARNOLD ALHERT

October 19, 2002 -- IT'S more than a little ironic. On the same day it was announced that Saddam Hussein has been "unanimously" re-elected, the only two senators preventing a unanimous vote in the Senate on the election-reform bill were New York's own Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton.

Why? "This would make it more difficult to vote in New York. It's designed to suppress minority voting participation," said Sen. Clinton.

The "this" Sen. Clinton is referring to is the new anti-fraud provisions in the bill. They require that every person wanting to vote show a driver's license, Social Security number or other approved ID in order to cast a ballot.

Clinton and Schumer preferred a system where a potential voter merely had to sign his or her name.

So who is it exactly that this bill is "suppressing"? U.S. citizens have all the requisite ID - no matter what their ethnicity. Could it be that Clinton and Schumer are "sensitive" to some of the leftist fringe groups in this country who are clamoring for the right of illegal aliens to vote?

It is no secret that New York is home to thousands of undocumented "residents" - who would vote overwhelmingly Democratic if they could just get past these darn ID requirements.

New York's dynamic duo have a lot more 'splainin' to do on this one.

E-mail: ahlert@mindspring.com

Q ERTY4 double bagel REALITY CHECK

bump!

 
 
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
--an old roadside ad, Pushme-Pullyou
 
 
 
 

22 posted on 10/20/2002 2:20:07 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
This is a joke. No way this group can delver on this. Of course, they really do not have to deliver, they merely have to convince people they will deliver.
23 posted on 10/20/2002 7:57:17 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
bump
25 posted on 10/20/2002 9:08:30 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
~~~Some people here on FR added comments in support of the previous release~~~

Can you explain more please?
26 posted on 10/20/2002 9:15:03 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1stFreedom
bump
29 posted on 10/21/2002 12:12:43 PM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson