Skip to comments.
Lautenberg up by 5 in new poll
politics NJ ^
| 10-21-02
| Eagleton Poll
Posted on 10/21/2002 5:54:12 AM PDT by frmrda
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
To: chimera
It was a choice between an honest Republican and a patently corrupt 'Rat, and the stench of corruption was too great for the 'Rat issue positions to overcome, so Forrester was the choice. You wouldn't have known that by all the comments here on FR in June/July saying Forrester didn't have a prayer. Not surprisingly, I disagreed.
Forrester has been hammering Lautenberg, and he will continue to hit him. I hope they go full court (if they haven't already) on Lautenberg dodging the debates. Nothing like planting seeds of doubt in voters' minds. Why is an 18-year veteran afraid to debate a relative newcomer to politcs? Hmmm...
41
posted on
10/22/2002 9:25:44 AM PDT
by
Coop
To: frmrda
Forrester should have a debate; two podiums; he shows up, the other side is absent; Forrester answers questions of some impartial moderator willing to participate/sponsor; Forrester finishes each question with "And I would like to hear from my opponent, but I guess debates are not his cup of tea", etc.
Just a thought, an idea, don't know if anyone else posted something similar. Of course it won't happen but I would lay odds it would give Forrester alot of exposure.
42
posted on
10/22/2002 10:15:52 AM PDT
by
Hostage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson